118 messages,
Last post on Apr 17, 2012 at 4:51 PM
You are in the
Honda Pilot Forum.
What is this discussion about?
Chevrolet Tahoe, Honda Pilot, Isuzu Trooper, Ford Expedition, Dodge Durango, Ford Freestyle, Volvo XC90, SUV
#10 of 118 Hybrib replaced Minivan
by boxtrooper
Mar 08, 2007 (8:53 am)
A friend has replaced her minivan with a nearly new hybrid Civic or something like that. The family's other car is a Tahoe. She says the switch is nice for lower cost of fuel, but she has to plan more carefully to swap for the Tahoe in anticipation of picking up her kids friends along with her own kids or for anything that requires more room. Her kids have to plan for only the things they need in the seat with them, other stuff has to be placed in the trunk.
..
Her change to a hybrid was cost effective because of unforeseen circumstances that landed the hybrid in her possession, she had to decide to keep the minivan or the hybrid not both.
#11 of 118 Re: Death of the body-on-frame SUV? [sddoc07]
by volvomax
Mar 08, 2007 (10:00 am)
I don't think the body on frame SUV will go away entirely, but its numbers will decrease.
One other thing to consider is that the body on frame vehicle is cheaper to build than a unibody SUV.
So, the motor companies bottom line is enhanced by these trucks.
Also, as others have mentioned, they deal with heavier loads and stresses better than unibody vehicles do.
However,they are inherently less safe than unibody vehicles.
#12 of 118 Re: Hybrib replaced Minivan [boxtrooper]
by odie6l
Mar 11, 2007 (7:43 pm)
yeah, but Toyota is getting ready to unveil it's Hybrid Minivan. that alone will flood the market with people who "gotta have it" and don't need it.
Odie
Odie's Carspace
#13 of 118 Re: Hybrib replaced Minivan [odie6l]
by boxtrooper
Mar 12, 2007 (7:22 pm)
Odie, I like that name!
Toyota has made an investment in Isuzu for diesel engine technology. I think an Isuzu diesel/hybrid minivan with an inline diesel designed to be easy to work on from the accessible side that gets 40+ MPG would suit a lot of people. Diesel has produces less "carbon footprint" than gasoline and gasoline less than ethanol fuels.
..
I would go for the diesel even if not a hybrid, because simple is very good for reliability. The hybrid would give stop and go drivers excellent response and the diesel would be awesome over the open road.
#14 of 118 Re: Its about use of the vehicle [stevedebi]
by bobw3
Mar 13, 2007 (8:59 am)
For those folks who use the towing capability a few times a month in the summer, then it does make sense to own something that can handle your towing needs. But I think it's unlikely that many of the soccor moms/dads driving Expeditions, etc in subarbia or on their morning commute do much if any towing.
I think most folks (and I don't think folks on these forums are "most folks") buy the big SUVs strictly for image and style. No problem...it's their money. But since the huge body on frame SUVs are bought mostly for image/style, just as style's change, so will the number of folks buying this sort of vehicle if they really have no need...and the reduced numbers indicate this. But you'll always have a core group of folks (those posting here) that will always have a true need.
#15 of 118 Re: Its about use of the vehicle [bobw3]
by boxtrooper
Mar 13, 2007 (7:06 pm)
My sister says she and her husband drive big SUVs for two reasons:
..
1.) they have been in accidents where they were stopped and some other driver missed a turn or in some other way smashed their minivan and car at different incidents. The SUV on frame especially the largest of them, survive better when being crashed into, so they drive big SUVs for safety.
..
2.) The second reason is that she is self employed and can get a huge discount / rebate from the federal government for buying a vehicle in excess of 6000 lb. GVW. So the big SUV costs her much less than a car or even a hybrid to drive. The federal discount is meant for plumbers and the like, but all that is needed to qualify is the 6000 lb.
#16 of 118 Re: Its about use of the vehicle [boxtrooper]
by tidester
Mar 13, 2007 (9:45 pm)
but all that is needed to qualify is the 6000 lb.
No, that's not all. You must also use the vehicle for business - plumbing or otherwise.
tidester, host
SUVs and Smart Shopper
#17 of 118 Re: Its about use of the vehicle [boxtrooper]
by bobw3
Mar 14, 2007 (5:53 am)
SUV on frame especially the largest of them, survive better when being crashed into,
If you're sitting in an big SUV or a small sedan and you're car is hit in the side by a big SUV, the small sedan being lighter may move upon impact and absorb some of the shock, where the heavy SUV will just sit there and take the impact.
Then you have to look at the door design to see which one absorbs the impact better. I don't know if you want a lot of heavy steel pushed into the passenger cabin.
Bottom line is that weight is only one factor and not necessarily an advantage in every type of crash situation.
What was the outcome of your sister's two previous accidents? Any serious injuries? I would think that folks in accidents tend to overcompensate, sort of like someone who has a friend who died in a plane wreck, so now they'll will never fly. Or they'll never let their kids play football because they heard about a kid dying from a freak football injury. Or they'll never eat food X because they heard on the radio that food X causes cancer in rats.
If we take safety to the extreme, everyone would be living in their basements eating organic rice every day and never leaving their house. To me, everyone driving giant SUV just to "be safe" is just as extreme.
#18 of 118 Re: Its about use of the vehicle [bobw3]
by boxtrooper
Mar 14, 2007 (6:41 pm)
I think the safer feeling in the big SUV comes from the frame for strength and the height, so the sedan will go under or crush its hood to absorb the energy. Just this afternoon I saw the aftermath of a mid to smallish Japanese brand car rear ending a Yukon. I looked like the Yukon might have scratches on its plastic bumper cover while the car needs a whole new front end, and is definitely not drivable.
..
I think there are people out there in little cars that want to do away with big SUVs for fear of being run over.
#19 of 118 Re: Its about use of the vehicle [boxtrooper]
by barnstormer64
Mar 14, 2007 (7:51 pm)
I think there are people out there in little cars that want to do away with big SUVs for fear of being run over.
I don't worry about them running me over. But I do care about not being able to see around them.