You are here: Forums Pickups Toyota Tacoma Toyota Tacoma 2004 and Earlier Frame Problem

Toyota Tacoma 2004 and Earlier Frame Problem

921 messages,  Last post on Nov 06, 2009 at 11:20 AM

You are in the Toyota Tacoma Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Toyota Tacoma, Toyota 4Runner, Car Safety, Auto Body, Car Warranties, Truck

Messages Page 53 of 93 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 93 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#520 of 921 Re: Toyota Frame Rust Buy-Back Program [theiglu] by daleyplanit Nov 09, 2008 (6:45 am)
Replying to: theiglu (Nov 08, 2008 11:43 am) Chkman and theiglu   You both mentioned cases of getting a loaner for 2001 model year failures. Is this up to the dealership to decide? I don't understand why I was declined the option. My dealership (Lia Toyota in Colonie NY) refused my requests I'll call out the Toyota care representatives I've spoken to - Joey Lopez and Autumn Branch - both told me that there was no way I could get a loaner or be reimbursed for one. WTF is going on here? I've been out of a car for 60 days!!!!
#525 of 921 Re: Toyota Frame Rust Buy-Back Program [chkman] by tcincy Nov 09, 2008 (4:25 pm)
chkman: Yes, you're correct. I thought his Toyota was older and covered under the program like mine. But I still propose that ANY Tacoma owner who has rust on the frame file a complaint wiht the NTSB and Toyota, and word it very clearly that it is a SAFETY ISSUE. That way, enough owners complain in writing, then it there may very well be a recall. I certainly consider rusted frames to be a safety issue and so should any Taco owner, whether covered under the rust buyback or not. Thanks again for the correction. Replies to this message: screwed4 (Jan 08, 2009 10:47 am) mcalautt (Jan 08, 2009 11:36 am) doubleusn (Jan 08, 2009 4:45 pm)
#527 of 921 re: loaners and lemon law by daleyplanit Nov 12, 2008 (7:38 am)
here is NY's lemon law   http://autopedia.com/html/LemonLaw/NewYork_NY_lemonlaw2.html   NY AG's office   http://www.oag.state.ny.us/bureaus/consumer_frauds/tips/usedcar_lemon_factsheet.- - - html   Cars Covered by the NY Used Car Lemon Law Include any car that: 1. was purchased, leased or transferred after the earlier of 18,000 miles or two years from original delivery; AND 2. was purchased or leased from a New York dealer; AND 3. had a purchase price or lease value of at least $1,500; AND 4. has been driven less than 100,000 miles at the time of purchase/lease; AND is used primarily for personal purposes. Unfortuately, in my case I'm not eligable for the protection. I bought my truck in March of 2007 with 102,000 miles - see #4 I bought m truck in NJ - #2 I had 129k on the clock when the frame rust was discovered.#1   Ugh! talk about bad luck!!! I have no dealer history with lia (the place that inspected when i bought the truck and then found the frame damage 18 months later. They're not my favorate place on the planet - perhaps they should have found indications of rust back in march of 2007.   Tcincy is right- this is a safety issue. I wrote to notify my DMV inspection shop unit who informed me that they know about the problem with the 1995-2000 trucks, but because toyota never issued a bulliten for newer trucks, there was no warning to shops about the 2001 and newer models. Kinda scary, huh? If firestone hadn't seen this before, and hadn't notified me about the damage and buy-back, i could have been killed in an accident had I been driving around. Scary, huh? I don't know how many people are out there tooling around in these trucks, but i know when the frames start failing, and people are being hurt, toyota will (and should) hava massive class action lawsuit on their hands. They shouldn't say they had no knowledge of the danger. Considering I have quite a bit of stock in toyota, i should write the SEC. Toyota's ignorance is a sign they aren't willing to face the liability of class action exposure - and they are open to risk of a lawsuit that will surely lower the value of their stock. That kind of ignorace is criminal. if I had the time and patience I'd try the angle, but I've been too busy with the safety issue to go after them for fraud.
#528 of 921 Toyota policy gets more and more frustrating by daleyplanit Nov 12, 2008 (8:43 am)
Septebmer 22 - Lia Toyota, Colonie, NY " Your truck is not safe to drive. You can't keep your truck here uness you pay $35 per day. You have to drive it home or pay to have it towed. You get no loaner. Call 1-800-Go-Toyota."   Toyota corporate offers me $1000 less than KBB value to buy my truck back. I can't get enymore from them. I ask toyota for money to tow it back to the dealer if i need to for the buyback - they decline my request.   October 22; Toyota Care Customer support techs Autumn Branch and Joey Lopez "So long as we can load it on a truck, we can tow it from your house." I ask for this in writing, they decline my request.   I 'unregister the truck, take the plates off and take the insurance off.   November 12- Toyota ISG rep calls about my check "You must have the truck at the dealership to collect payment. We do not provide towing and will not come to your house."   Now I have to pay to tow it back to the dealership. This is outrageous.   Excuse me but this is complete bull$hit. If Toyota would but things in writing, or give me the same story twice in a row this would not happen. I am so angry right now I could explode. Replies to this message: theiglu (Nov 15, 2008 3:25 pm) daleyplanit (Nov 18, 2008 2:24 pm) blorch (Nov 27, 2008 4:35 am) and 1 more...

Messages Page 53 of 93 1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 93 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Pickups Toyota Tacoma Toyota Tacoma 2004 and Earlier Frame Problem