You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Smart Car
Article Comments 2008 Smart Fortwo First Drive

110 messages, Last post on Aug 07, 2008 at 8:31 AM
You are in the Smart Car Forum. Your Host is pf_flyer
Article comments for First Drive: 2008 Smart Fortwo - The 2008 Fortwo is larger than its predecessor, but it's still outrageously small, some 40 inches shorter than a Mini. In real life, it looks like an artist's impression of what a car might look like if we all drank skinny lattes. (more)
Full Test: 2008 Smart Fortwo Passion - Bottom Line: Hugely versatile as a city-only car, but perhaps not the best choice for those who go farther or need to carry more. (more)
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: karkus (Sep 07, 2007 1:20 pm) Do you have a link to the EPA estimates? Its not on their website. But Smarts UK website gives a combined mileage at 60.1 (that translates to 50 MPG here in the US) which is higher than the Prius 45 combined.
|
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Sep 07, 2007 6:58 pm) It'll be fine. Really. |
|
|
|
| There are so many models of cars because people have such a variety of needs for a car. It would be foolish to buy a Mac truck to carry an occasional sheet of plywood, or to buy a pickup truck to haul heavy machinery long distances. If people are smart (no pun intended), they choose a model suitable for their needs, not for appearance or for the 'toy' factor. I bought a Smart car in June to replace a Mazda van which had reached my usual trade-in age. For the same cost as buying a Prius or a new van, I kept the van for expressway driving and use the Smart car in the city. I've used the van twice in 2 months. My weekly fuel costs have gone from $40 per week to $15 per week. The savings covers the additional insurance costs. Now I have an apple AND an orange... without needed to do impossible comparisons of the two. Am I happy? ABSOLUTELY! | |
|
|
|
The Smart vs. Hybrid debate is pointless. Hybrid owners pay for their fuel savings through a higher purchase price. And they typically finance their purchase, compounding the problem. With the understanding that hybrids don't make financial sense, the Smart could get 25mpg and still be a sound financial choice over a hybrid. If your goal is to drive a hybrid for the "Look at me, I'm saving the planet" factor, you're throwing good money after bad and the Smart isn't for you anyway. If you want to drive something unique and save a few bucks at the same time, then seriously consider the Smart. For those that claim there is no truth to the automobile CAFE standards, I say, "you haven't learned how to drive your car properly". My '03 V6 Accord is rated at 30mpg highway and I average 33 mpg (actual) with little effort in mixed highway/city driving. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: hineychaser (Sep 20, 2007 3:07 am) While I agree that driving properly you should be able to meet or exceed EPA estimates but exceeding the highway estimate by 10% in mixed driving is a mighty hard pill to swallow. FWIW the EPA on their website has user MPG reports and the V6 Accord no one is showing above 30 MPG in mixed driving.
|
|
|
Replying to: plekto (Mar 16, 2007 6:30 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: snakeweasel (Sep 20, 2007 3:58 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: diesel18 (Jan 11, 2008 2:52 am) |
|
|
Replying to: diesel18 (Jan 11, 2008 2:52 am) |
|
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Hatchbacks
Smart Car
Article Comments 2008 Smart Fortwo First Drive
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2009 smart fortwo



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats