- #105 of 139
-
Re: Difference between 07 and 08 M35 [barryend]
by mooseseeker
-
Jan 16, 2008 (7:23 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: barryend (Jan 16, 2008 7:00 pm)
TY for your opinion. I ended up leasing an '08 M35X and it is a superb vehicle (as was the '06). However, the gas mileage is horrific... less than 19mpg on mostly hwy driving. A 6-speed transmission would improve mileage and improve my overall satisfaction.
|
- #106 of 139
-
Re: Difference between 07 and 08 M35 [barryend]
by bocatrip
-
Jan 19, 2008 (10:31 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: barryend (Jan 16, 2008 7:00 pm)
The 6 speek trans will most probably only help with a 2 or 3 mpg improvement. Infiniti needs to start thinking of more fuel efficient engines as they are way behind other manufacturers in this dept.
|
- #107 of 139
-
Re: Difference between 07 and 08 M35 [bocatrip]
by 150mphclub
-
Jan 19, 2008 (12:37 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: bocatrip (Jan 19, 2008 10:31 am)
2 or 3 mpg would be a 10% improvement and this engine could be tuned for another 10%, if Infiniti wanted to do it. I don't think Infiniti cares about mpg. They are too busy trying to get the "experts" approval for outperforming BMW.
|
- #108 of 139
-
hints about the 2009 M's
by ghstudio
-
Mar 04, 2008 (6:50 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: 150mphclub (Jan 19, 2008 12:37 pm)
Today, the 2009 FX enters the scene officially with the 3.7 engine (and the 5.0 V8) as well as a seven speed transmission and paddle shifters. Suddenly the M35/45 are looking very old.....
|
- #109 of 139
-
Re: hints about the 2009 M's [ghstudio]
by 150mphclub
-
Apr 09, 2008 (11:21 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: ghstudio (Mar 04, 2008 6:50 pm)
I believe the 2009 FX35 just retunes the 3.5 engine for 28 extra HP, but it does get a seven speed, which the M35 desparately needs.
|
- #110 of 139
-
Re: hints about the 2009 M's [150mphclub]
by barryend
-
Apr 09, 2008 (11:39 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: 150mphclub (Apr 09, 2008 11:21 am)
Will the 2009 MX get the 7-speed? Folding rear seat option would be good also. Don't accept the RS-A Goodyears.
Many bloggers are astounded that the new FX is so ugly. I will visit a showroom when it comes out.
|
- #111 of 139
-
Re: Difference between 07 and 08 M35 [mooseseeker]
by jeff721
-
Apr 21, 2008 (5:08 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: mooseseeker (Jan 16, 2008 7:23 pm)
How do you like the Voice activation changes on the nav and phone? i am cosidering the 08 after comming out of an 06 m35X
thanks,
jeff
|
- #112 of 139
-
Re: Difference between 07 and 08 M35 [jeff721]
by ghstudio
-
Jun 29, 2008 (1:21 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: jeff721 (Apr 21, 2008 5:08 pm)
Just got a 2008 M35 to replace my 06 (both leased) with tech package and nav. Here are my very first observations.
The navigation system has a number of pluses over the 2006. 1) records CD's onto the hard disk into a "music box". 2) Input by CF Card 3) Ipod connector 4) audio connectors in back of console 4) Trainable voice for multiple users 5) touch screen input. 5) XM standard and well integrated (wasn't standard in 06).
The negatives (or disappointments) include 1) the manual clearly shows how many voice commands they get in canada (wow) and how few we get in the US....it is crippled to the point of being useless other than for nav, in my opinion. eg. you can turn the climate control on or off..that's it. 2) Still no search by street and then select the city 3) you still lose significant function when the car is moving....there's no change here..it still sucks. 4) Fuel economy guage is now graphical so you can't see 16.6 or 17.1..you see a bar graph. 5) She still talks too much...great for demo's but after you learn the system, you don't need all those prompts (I've already changed to short prompts which doesn't seem to do a thing).
More later after I try Bluetooth.
|
- #113 of 139
-
Re: Difference between 07 and 08 M35 [ghstudio]
by blov8r
-
Jun 30, 2008 (6:31 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: ghstudio (Jun 29, 2008 1:21 pm)
I also went to an '08 when my '06 lease was up and I still like the car ... like driving it even more than my '06 because the '06 was a sport model with a harsher and more noisy ride. That aside I think the engineers at Nissan/Infiniti fouled a few things up and didn't add a couple that I would have liked. They've monkeyed with the nav system, taken away some radio and climate control voice commands actually making the radio quite awkward to pre-program, still don't lock the doors when you drive off, and leave the fuel tank unprotected (now in the days of gas thieves it's important). I also don't like the lack of digital display of gas mileage and I suspect they did that to soft-pedal the fact that they have made no effort to improve fuel economy and the digital display trumpets this failing. They've been so stubborn about this that they seem to think gas mileage is inconsequential to Infiniti buyers and it becomes a badge of honor to pay more for gas! To my 7K per year it's not a big issue but it is an annoyance. The flip side is that there's very little out there that would make me happy/comfortable that does materially better in than the 17 +/- I get in mostly local driving. I drove them all (starting three months before lease's end) and every time I got back into my '06 to drive home I simply liked it better than the test drive I had just left. The closest thing I found to the M was a Lexus GS but it wasn't worth the extra $$$ to me. Bart
|
- #114 of 139
-
Re: Difference between 07 and 08 M35 [ghstudio]
by bw45sport
-
Jun 30, 2008 (7:42 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: ghstudio (Jun 29, 2008 1:21 pm)
2) Still no search by street and then select the city 3) you still lose significant function when the car is moving....there's no change here..it still sucks. 4) Fuel economy gauge is now graphical so you can't see 16.6 or 17.1..you see a bar graph. 5) She still talks too much...great for demo's but after you learn the system, you don't need all those prompts (I've already changed to short prompts which doesn't seem to do a thing).
In those cases where you aren't sure of the city use the touch screen to enter the street and house number if you wish. You will then have the opportunity to select from a city list.
I highly doubt Infiniti will choose to change the way they handle interaction with nav/system settings while the car is in motion. They feel, as do their Japanese counterparts, that it is unsafe and I don't necessarily disagree with them. While I consider myself a very safe driver, I've had a couple of occasions in a Mercedes where I was concentrating too much on the nav screen and not on traffic. Depending on your speed, it only takes a second to make a huge mistake.
I suspect that 2009 and later model M's will receive a change that was made to the new G. While the G also shows a bar graph on the nav screen for mpg, you can display mpg digitally in a new information screen that sits between the tach and speedometer.
I'm surprised to hear that you feel that the minimize voice prompts didn't make a difference in voice commands. I know that you are still prompted for each piece of information when entering an address but the prompts for everything else have pretty much gone away.
Compared to the nightmares I had with recent vintage Benzes and BMW's these shortcomings don't even register on my screen any more.
|