You are here: Forums Sedans Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable What Are Your Thoughts on the Return of the Taurus/Sable?

What Are Your Thoughts on the Return of the Taurus/Sable?

530 messages,  Last post on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:00 PM

You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Five Hundred, Ford Taurus, Mercury Sable, Future Vehicle, Sedan, Wagon

Messages Page 28 of 54 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ... 54 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

#269 of 530 Re: Ok, so I was wrong.... [barnstormer64] by albook Mar 01, 2007 (7:53 pm)
Replying to: barnstormer64 (Mar 01, 2007 4:50 pm) About as boring as any of the other "competitors"   About everyone on this forum will tell you that 300/charger/GrandPrix/ Maxima aren't boring. Lucerne and Avalon aren't bad looking either-ten times better looking than 500. Is the 500 a bad looking car? No. Is it a good looking car? No. Here's my scale:                  ugly nothing Beautiful                  -10 ... 0 ... 10 500 and freestyle get 0's. THey have no style. Montego get's a 2. It looks a little nice. Mercury gives it some nice touches. But there is no perk that makes me want this car. it has no pickup. Backseat is awesome but so is 300/Charger. Trunk is awesome, but charger/ Avalon/ Impala's aren't bad either. Ford just has a bland inexpensive car hear. (300's don't cost that much either...) Replies to this message: pnewby (Mar 02, 2007 6:34 am)
#270 of 530 Re: Ok, so I was wrong.... [albook] by pnewby Mar 02, 2007 (6:34 am)
Replying to: albook (Mar 01, 2007 7:53 pm) And using that analogy, 300 is a -8, Camry and Avalon are 0, the new model maybe a 1. Parked next to an '05 Camry in my '05 Freestyle, and suddenly saw exactly what Ford was doing on the syle, copying the best selling car as far as looks went. And the '07 restyle is less inovative than the minor changes we see on the '08 Taurus. The content changes (options, engine, etc.) seem much more significant than anything I saw on the Toyota "Restyle". Oh, and the Maxima and Pontiac aren't boring? Maybe fugly?
#273 of 530 albook by kirstie_h HOST Mar 02, 2007 (9:48 am)
Per our membership agreement, please update the e-mail listed in your profile to a valid address. Thanks!
#274 of 530 Style points by donl1 Mar 02, 2007 (1:46 pm)
Have to disagree on the rating of the Five Hundred and 300. I owned a 05 LTD AWD Five Hundred for almost a year and traded for a 06 300C AWD. Compliments and positive remarks were lopsidedly biased towards the Chrysler. And now having owned and drove both for almost 20K I have to agree. Not everyone will agree with me...that's fine...that's why they make so many different cars. But I've owned and drove both and the Chrysler is a better driver...IMO. Replies to this message: hardhawk (Mar 05, 2007 9:39 am) pnewby (Mar 05, 2007 10:41 am)
#276 of 530 Good Move by danielj6 Mar 03, 2007 (6:26 pm)
Although looks and style are subjective, the Ford 500 makes a statement without perhaps projecting an image of the driver, for those who are into impressing others.   It is a sober, tall, imposing car that commands respect on the road. But most of all is a strong and safe car which it will be greatly improved when officially becomes the Taurus. This is also true for the soon to be the Montego.   While owning a Sable wagon, I enjoyed, among other things, its utilitarian nature and comfort. It served me well and, to me was a serious and handsome vehicle which showed understated beauty. I never impressed anyone nor did I really care other peoples' comments and unsolicited opinions about it.   I'm very optimistic and hopeful and that the new Taurus will break the Accord/Camry dynasty, although it (Taurus) apparently will compete with the Avalon and 300. Replies to this message: gregg_vw (Mar 03, 2007 7:42 pm)
#277 of 530 Re: Good Move [danielj6] by gregg_vw Mar 03, 2007 (7:42 pm)
Replying to: danielj6 (Mar 03, 2007 6:26 pm) The Taurus name is a good move...to draw attention to a car that can stand out no other way. It's anonymous and it's boring, even if it performs just fine in a field of cars that do the same. Bottom line, it ain't gonna save Ford.   I agree that the 1986 to 1995 Sable wagon had a certain understated je n'ai ce quoi, even though at the same time, it stood out. The 1996 on was awkwardly styled, even goofy. The weirdness of it eventually killed sales. The 2008 is understated again, but this time almost to the point of anonymity. Ford's in trouble, yet all they seem to be able to bring to the table are more yawns.
#278 of 530 Re: Ok, so I was wrong.... [albook] by nvbanker Mar 04, 2007 (9:03 am)
Replying to: albook (Feb 28, 2007 7:53 pm) In defense of the barnstormer, the Freestyle and the Five Hundred may be a little on the Camry-dull side, but I have great admiration and regard for both vehicles. Rather than being Mazda 6 underneath, these two cars are Volvo S-80 under there, which is a fine machine, and ergo; these two vehicles handle extremely well, are comfortable to sit in, and should be excellent long term cars, plus, they are as roomy and useful as they come. I think the barnstormer is practical and wise, if not a little on the dull side.... Heck, excitement is overrated anyway.... Replies to this message: gregg_vw (Mar 04, 2007 11:03 am)

Messages Page 28 of 54 1 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ... 54 Prev Next Last

Go To Msg # Search This Discussion

You are here: Forums Sedans Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable What Are Your Thoughts on the Return of the Taurus/Sable?