Sign In Join 



What Are Your Thoughts on the Return of the Taurus/Sable?

530 messages,  Last post on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:00 PM

You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Five Hundred, Ford Taurus, Mercury Sable, Future Vehicle, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 25 of 54
1
...
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
...
54
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#232 of 530
Re: Good Move [bristol2] by barnstormer64
Feb 22, 2007 (7:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bristol2 (Feb 22, 2007 6:48 am)

Any lawyer who drives a yaris would not be the guy I want representing me.
If the CEO of my company shows up in a Civic, I'm not sure that suggests success.

 
I think I'd rather use a different metric to judge their success. But you can use what car they drive, if that's how you really feel.
#233 of 530
Re: Value vs Image [thegraduate] by barnstormer64
Feb 22, 2007 (7:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Feb 22, 2007 9:28 am)

That's one opinion, but it's not necessarily the only one
 
But it's the only right one.
#234 of 530
Re: Good Move [albook] by barnstormer64
Feb 22, 2007 (7:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: albook (Feb 22, 2007 2:16 pm)

The 300 has a fresh new look
 
Which impressed me for a few months. But now it's kinda sickening to look at, actually.
#235 of 530
Re: Value vs Image [gtee] by barnstormer64
Feb 22, 2007 (7:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gtee (Feb 21, 2007 8:20 pm)

IntelliChoice list the cost of 5 years of ownership of 2007 Ford 500 limited as $38,126 .
  
Again from IntelliChoice the cost for 5 years of ownership of a 2007 Toyota Avalon XLS is: $37,711

 
They're making one HECK of a lot of assumptions, aren't they?
 
Why not look at the 2005 models? And then use what I actually paid in the calculation, instead of whatever they assumed?
#236 of 530
Re: Value vs Image [barnstormer64] by gtee
Feb 22, 2007 (7:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: barnstormer64 (Feb 22, 2007 7:13 pm)

I don't know which assumptions they used, but when I look at my own experience with Ford Expedition, I can tell you that it was no great deal overall. Yes I paid way less for Expedition then I would have paid for Toyota Sequoia. But now when its time to trade it in for a new car, the Expedition is worth nothing. Its almost embarrassing to admit to a dealer that you have Expedition to trade. Nobody wants them. Again its this whole image issue. Ford just has a really bad image and many people just avoid Ford cars. They are truly afraid to buy them. A friend of mine has a Ford Explorer with 200k miles on it, and its still running. But when he goes to buy a new car he is looking for Toyota or Honda. I don't know how things got so bad for Ford.
#237 of 530
500 by dvdlgh
Feb 23, 2007 (6:55 am)
Reply
Poor choice by Ford. 500 is a much better name than Taurus. I love the 500 dash, reminds me of '88 Audi 80 that I once owned. GM exterior designs remind me of my aunt. You know the one with too much cheap jewelry and dime store perfume and they're basically the same as 15 years ago with tweaking here and there. GM dashes must have been designed by Rubbermade, but have improved as of late. PS: the fix for GM brakes is called aftermarket parts.
#238 of 530
We're straying by kirstie_h HOST
Feb 23, 2007 (7:54 am)
Reply
...fairly far afield here. Let's try to stick to opinions about the return of the names we all love or hate.
 
If you're not a big fan, check out this carspace page:
http://www.carspace.com/xcargrl
for some rather humorous and musical videos. I quite like "the wreck of the Alan Mulally."
#239 of 530
500 by nvbanker
Feb 23, 2007 (7:55 am)
Reply
I don't think there is anything wrong with the 500 name - but the Taurus name has 20 years of recognition going for it, like Camry does, Malibu and Impala do, Grand Prix do. There has been a move currently by all domestics to dump their heritage names and move to numbers, yet the Standard of the World, Toyota, keeps making Camrys. wonder why they don't rename the Camry the 400? Must be a reason....
 
I would have prefered they name the Fusion the Taurus from the start - and keep the 500 name, but improve the looks of that car - but either way, the Taurus should live on. I'm glad it's back. I do think it'll help - may not be a grand slam, but it'll help.
#240 of 530
Re: Good Move [barnstormer64] by albook
Feb 23, 2007 (2:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: barnstormer64 (Feb 22, 2007 7:11 pm)

Which impressed me for a few months. But now it's kinda sickening to look at, actually.
THe good thing about the 300 is that aside from being a GREAT looking car, it's stayed that way for about 4 years. Few cars sell that hot 4 years straight. That's fresh. and the Five hu- don't make me spell it!- stale and boring. I can't stand to look at that. Ii look at it on the street and say "what was ford thinking?! no one want's this! They want good looking!!!"
#241 of 530
Image by albook
Feb 23, 2007 (2:24 pm)
Reply
This discussion is getting on my nerves. Let me put my $.02 in:
Image means NOTHING. If it defines you, then you are SHALLOW!It's nice to have that Bimmer 5 (trust me!). And you should own a car you like, and like to look at. It's stupid to pay that much money for something you don't like. But-as Barn..whatever was saying earlier- THis is where people mke stupid investing mistakes. Spending all their money because they think they have to compete with the guy acrossed the street and his S-class. It's fine to want it 'cause you like it- but not 'cause everyone else has it. "If everyone else was jumping off a bridge..."

Messages Page 25 of 54
1
...
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
...
54
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement