Sign In Join 



What Are Your Thoughts on the Return of the Taurus/Sable?

530 messages,  Last post on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:00 PM

You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Five Hundred, Ford Taurus, Mercury Sable, Future Vehicle, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 20 of 54
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
...
54
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#185 of 530
Re: Good Move [gregg_vw] by bristol2
Feb 19, 2007 (12:19 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Feb 19, 2007 11:56 am)

This is off-topic for the Taurus theme but it seems pretty clear that the next F-150 is key.
The latest editions of the Expedition and the Explorer are both great vehicles but came out at the moment that gas got up to $2.50 - $3.00 a gallon. That sucked all the air out of those releases. I think the real shame there is that Ford continues to drag on bringing a diesel to these vehicles. If you could get an Expedition that got 25-30mpg, they could call the 500 what ever they felt like.
 
With the F-150 there is real brand equity and they cannot afford to make a mistake there.
 
How would they rebrand that one?
#186 of 530
gregg by nvbanker
Feb 19, 2007 (12:46 pm)
Reply
Ford neglects two things over and over: innovative styling and keeping up with the hp wars.
 
Can't argue with ya there, gregg - GM seems to be able to do it more efficiently, their HP is bigger, and economy a little better most places in the line. Ford also neglects advertising, and the advertising they do is "lifestyle" ads - if I were ARM, I'd fire their agency, and whichever Ford family member works there, and get someone in there that will show THE CAR in the ads for a change!! Surfboards and cute girls are fine, but I never saw the car! C'mon!!
#187 of 530
Re: gregg [nvbanker] by gregg_vw
Feb 19, 2007 (1:27 pm)
Reply

Replying to: nvbanker (Feb 19, 2007 12:46 pm)

I agree. Lifestyle ads aren't cutting it. Talk up the features lauded here. Even the lux brands like Lexus (showing the new one parallel parking itself) and Maserati (talking about their new automatic) don't rely on lifetyle ads. And the Edge ads with it always on the edge of two wheels is pretty stupid too.
 
Taurus and Sable ads should definitely emphasize the power, the room and the quiet. Forget the "all new" horse puckey and brag about what's real. (Of course it doesn't matter much what they do in ads for Sable, since the company apparently has already decided mercury is a goner.)
#188 of 530
Re: gregg [gregg_vw] by nvbanker
Feb 19, 2007 (4:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Feb 19, 2007 1:27 pm)

I personally don't like the Sable name, and wish they'd forget about it. Montego is better now or forever to me, but the Taurus brand shouldn't die, it should be re-invigorated, hopefully that's what they are doing. They really need to advertise the crap out of it though - and the Edge - I guess that's just not for my generation...
#189 of 530
Re: I Always Thought The Freestyle... [barnstormer64] by albook
Feb 19, 2007 (5:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: barnstormer64 (Feb 17, 2007 11:08 am)

Which is fine. But just don't go touting how much more ECONOMICAL it is do so (as they typically do).
 
Yeah-I heard this guy going off on everyone who drives a car for more than four years because they are too expensive. NObody says this! Everyone knows it's personal prefence. Driving new cars has nothing to do with people getting imports. THey just choose them because they like them. No one is out to get ford. You're over reacting a little bit. And no one says domestics are no good. THey just say "in their oppinion" LExus has better quality than Lincoln-justifying their purchase. It DOES seem though, that a lot of people have been talking about how much better their Freestyle is than other crossovers.
#190 of 530
Re: Good Move [barnstormer64] by danielj6
Feb 19, 2007 (6:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: barnstormer64 (Feb 18, 2007 4:49 pm)

Before you put me in a position of justifying purchasing an Avalon over a 500, my point was in the context that giving incentives in the form of cash rebates defeats the image that Ford wants to project for the new Taurus, namely competitive quality to fight buyers' perception about Avalon.
 
I don't want to get off topic, but I usually look at what I get for my money and keep in mind that if there is a substantial price difference between two brands there must be a reason for it. To me the bottom line is not related to price difference alone.
#191 of 530
Re: Good Move [danielj6] by barnstormer64
Feb 19, 2007 (7:59 pm)
Reply

Replying to: danielj6 (Feb 19, 2007 6:05 pm)

and keep in mind that if there is a substantial price difference between two brands there must be a reason for it
 
You sound like my wife.
 
Fortunately, some of us realize that it's just not always true. It really IS possible to pay more for less.
#192 of 530
Re: Good Move [barnstormer64] by thegraduate
Feb 20, 2007 (9:22 am)
Reply

Replying to: barnstormer64 (Feb 19, 2007 7:59 pm)

A car is worth what the market will pay for it. In Ford's case, the Taurundred is worth less than the Avalon, because people won't pay Avalon prices for it. It's a business thing.
 
The market is simply saying it won't pay the same price for a Taurundred as it would an Avalon, because it doesn't deem it to be worth the price.
 
You may differ from the market; many do. For people who would have bought the Ford over the Toyota, the rebate cash is a bonus. To the rest of the world, its a condition of the sale.
#193 of 530
Re: Good Move [thegraduate] by albook
Feb 20, 2007 (2:17 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Feb 20, 2007 9:22 am)

A car is worth what the market will pay for it. In Ford's case, the Taurundred is worth less than the Avalon, because people won't pay Avalon prices for it. It's a business thing.
Exactly my point. Ford doesn't give anyone any reason to. otherwise, Ford wouln't be introuble would they? SOrry to continually come back to this, but no one wants to pay 35g for a Taurus X (freestyle).
For people who would have bought the Ford over the Toyota, the rebate cash is a bonus. To the rest of the world, its a condition of the sale.
NOt necessarily true. Many have traded in Bimmer %'s for Acura TL's just to save money. But money doesn't always make up for inconvinience.
#194 of 530
Re: Good Move [thegraduate] by barnstormer64
Feb 20, 2007 (5:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: thegraduate (Feb 20, 2007 9:22 am)

The market is simply saying it won't pay the same price for a Taurundred as it would an Avalon, because it doesn't deem it to be worth the price.
 
Markets are notoriously efficient, and notoriously wrong. That's why there's marketing folks out there, don't ya know.

Messages Page 20 of 54
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
...
54
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement