Sign In Join 



What Are Your Thoughts on the Return of the Taurus/Sable?

530 messages,  Last post on Aug 22, 2008 at 10:00 PM

You are in the Ford Taurus/Mercury Sable Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Ford Five Hundred, Ford Taurus, Mercury Sable, Future Vehicle, Sedan, Wagon


Messages Page 13 of 54
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
54
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#116 of 530
Re: perception vs. reality [exalteddragon1] by barnstormer64
Feb 14, 2007 (8:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: exalteddragon1 (Feb 13, 2007 10:20 pm)

It does not throw itself at you (so theives would not be interested in it)
 
A very good reason to own it.
 
With the Taurus redo of the 500, the main disadvantage, which is lack of power, will be addressed.
 
And yet it accelerates just as well as the 2005 Toyota Avalon XLS did.
 
Did I forget its on a Volvo platform? And i think it was the only car to get a five star side crash rating without airbags, right? This is a very good car
 
I didn't get it because it was Volvo-based, though that probably had a LOT to do with why it's such a great vehicle.
 
Style will only get better with the taurus. Did you see that exterrior chrome trim on the side? Pretty classy i think.
 
I hate chrome. Looks cheap and flashy. Wish I could've got my 500 LTD without so much of it.
#117 of 530
Re: perception vs. reality [brucelinc] by barnstormer64
Feb 14, 2007 (8:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: brucelinc (Feb 14, 2007 6:46 am)

I think the added insulation and structural reinforcements in the 2008 models will also be a huge plus in making the ride quieter and more refined
 
I'm pretty sure the older LTD versions had more sound insulation than the other trim levels.
 
Do you know how the new 2008's will compare to that?
#118 of 530
Re: perception vs. reality [brucelinc] by barnstormer64
Feb 14, 2007 (8:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: brucelinc (Feb 14, 2007 7:52 am)

and I think the prop-rod hood is tacky and cheap but the target buyer for this car apparently doesn't care about those things.
 
It is, a bit. But it's not high up on my list of important things for a nice car, that's for sure.
#119 of 530
Re: perception vs. reality [barnstormer64] by brucelinc
Feb 14, 2007 (8:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: barnstormer64 (Feb 14, 2007 8:04 am)

From the Media Ford site:
 
Interior quietness is often associated with a customer’s perception of overall quality. For 2008 the Taurus team has delivered interior quietness that rivals many luxury cars. The new sound package includes such technologies as expandable foam pellets in the A-pillars to reduce wind noise and the use of an advanced sound-deadening material called Sonosorb™ in the doors, headliner and pillars. Sonosorb increases sound-deadening efficiency by 20 percent while retaining the same thickness as the material it replaces.
 
Engineers also reduced road noise by stiffening the area where the rear package shelf meets the floor pan. Even the new climate control system is 50 percent quieter than before.

 
I am not aware that the older LTD models had more insulation than the others - perhaps they did - but it sounds like the above changes are across the whole line.
#120 of 530
Re: perception vs. reality [brucelinc] by brucelinc
Feb 14, 2007 (8:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: brucelinc (Feb 14, 2007 8:19 am)

Here is another quote from that site:
 
One of the most significant changes is how the engine is mounted in the vehicle. The engine was previously mounted to the front subframe. On the 2008 Taurus, the engine and transmission are bolted to the body with hydraulic mounts to reduce vibration. By moving the roughly 600-pound powerpack off the subframe, engineers were able to better tune the suspension and, ultimately, create an even better ride.
#121 of 530
Re: perception vs. reality [brucelinc] by barnstormer64
Feb 14, 2007 (8:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: brucelinc (Feb 14, 2007 8:19 am)

I am not aware that the older LTD models had more insulation than the others
 
I'm not 100% sure, but I seem to recall that.
 
Sounds like good changes they're making, in that regard.
 
Still, I think I'd miss the CVT. Maybe I'll have to test-drive one of the new ones, just to see.
#122 of 530
Re: perception vs. reality [gregg_vw] by heyjewel
Feb 14, 2007 (8:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Feb 14, 2007 7:32 am)

I agree with you guys. Like I said before, the addition of the 3.5L addresses the major fault with the car. They are substantial, roomy vehicles. I would consider one except for the granny-mode shifter and the name. I will NEVER own a car named after a small furry varmint. Call me crazy, but if they had left it as the Montego, I would have at least driven one and considered. Sable - no way.
#123 of 530
Re: perception vs. reality [heyjewel] by gregg_vw
Feb 14, 2007 (8:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: heyjewel (Feb 14, 2007 8:45 am)

Sable IS a dumb name. The only reason they are bringing it back is the recognition factor.
 
Mercury got off on a tangent back in the 80's with "Sable" and "Topaz," followed up with the dumber "Mystique." Montego's a good name, but too old for most car buyers to remember or relate to. Mondeo is even better, if starting anew. Here's hoping the Milan either goes away, or gets a stablemate named Mondeo.
 
And, over time, Sable could morph into "Mercury Mable." (Get it?...boring woman's car?). They could even offer a Sable Edition of the Mabel. Get a corner on the blue hair business, if the Grand Markee ever dies...while awaiting a redesign that could have a nice name like Marauder or Meteor or even Park Lane.
#124 of 530
Bold Moves- Dumb Moves by albook
Feb 14, 2007 (10:38 am)
Reply
Let me continue with my last statement.
WHat is Ford thinking? Copy off GM is what they should do. Look at gm's succes bringing over Euro models- Aura, G8 and Astra-and many more to come! FOrd's got all these great potetial models overseas. But they just lightly consider and then kick the idea to the curb. THIS is why ford will be dead in a few years! THey have no good models! ANd YES i think SAble is a stupid name, and MOntego is waaay better. THIs is why MErcury buyers are older than BUick.
#125 of 530
Re: perception vs. reality [gregg_vw] by albook
Feb 14, 2007 (10:50 am)
Reply

Replying to: gregg_vw (Feb 14, 2007 8:58 am)

Here's hoping the Milan either goes away, or gets a stablemate named Mondeo.
Milan along with fusion are very nice cars- in fact,xome of the best, and only selling cars in Fords stable!

Messages Page 13 of 54
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
54
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement