Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Future Vehicles A Vision of Buick's Future...
7 messages, Last post on Feb 24, 2009 at 7:16 AM
You are in the Future Vehicles Forum. Your Host is kirstie_h
|
LaCrosse and Lucerne likely get mid-cycle updates for 2008 model year. Of course, there's the new 2008 Buick LaCrosse Super coming out sometime this fall. It will have the 5.3 V-8 with heavy duty tranny and suspension, just like the Impala and Monte SS cars. I read where Pontiac is discontinuing the Grand Prix GXP.
|
|
|
Replying to: jpstax1 (Mar 07, 2007 8:23 am) The 2010' model year should bring us the Buick Velite Sedan, and I would naturally assume a Convertible will be launched at the same time or in the spring of 2010 as a 2011 model. The convertible is just a logical guess. The Velite Sedan, was on again until Lutz, pushed the pause button again because of CAFE increases proposed by Congress. I think that issue could make or break the Velite. I do have a logical solution and that problem and that is make the 2-Mode hybrid standard.  The RWD Lucerne, should see production in MY 2011 with most likely a "ULTRA V8" and the Cadillac DTS should be bigger yet and have RWD also. I personally feel these cars are so important to GM, that Lutz, is playing head games with the american people to get sympathy. I can understand why he is doing it as what other choice does he got ? We americans want our engines powerful and want our cars solid in feel. It adds weight but we love our cabins in our luxury cars super quiet. I'm one of those types and I'm against the CAFE standards until we get this alternative energy programs implemented. You can increase the emissions and fuel economy standards without building the infrastructure to support it. Rocky |
|
|
When will see the next LaCrosse on Epsilon II? Will it be unveiled in Detroit in January, or will we see the Riviera? |
|
|
|
|
Currently GM has an insurmountable challenge and a stable of brands that have lost their identity, Toyota is more successful with three brands than GM is with their 12 different brands, a clear sign of the times that change and consolidation is inevitable, below listed are the American/international brands owned by GM as well as a strategy to consolidate and help the company to survive in a rapidly changing business market. Below suggestions for merging entire brands into one entity, and reinvigorating certain brands under an international moniker could stave off bankruptcy and give gm the jolt it needs to become relevant in the auto market once again. Daewoo/Holden/Pontiac merge into Holden Brand (3 Brands become 1 brand) These three brands currently sell similar products. Take three regional players and merge them together under the strongest brand which is Holden. This would introduce a new player to the U.S. market and give the former Pontiac brand more vehicles and a new purpose. The internationalization of the auto market requires that these type of brand-mergers become a reality. GMC and Chevrolet merge into Chevrolet Brand (2 brands become 1 brand) most GMC and Chevrolet Vehicles overlap and are essentially rebadged copies, make it easier and consolidate into the stronger Chevrolet Brand. Hummer and Saab sold either jointly or separately to a private equity firm or other automaker. (2 brands divested) Hummer and Saab both require huge sums of investment in their product lines, it makes the most sense to sell these two brands either together or separately at market value. Opel/Vauxhall/Saturn merge to form Opel (3 brands become 1 brand) All of these brands essentially sell similar products. Take these three regional brands and form a strong international player under the Opel brand name. Saturn as a brand in the U.S. has no relevance but the opel logo and insignia could reinvigorate the entire company and product line. * Possible that Buick as a brand could also be dissolved as they only sell three different vehicles and do not have a strong presence in their operating market. I could see this brand being totally phased out by 2020, the other GM brands would more than make up for the loss in product/branding. This would also allow GM to focus on the core Cadillac/Chevrolet brands and their newly minted international brands of Holden and Opel Goals: Reduce duplicative brand management Reduce duplicative factories producing the same cars under different brand names. Create strong global players in the automotive business, no more regional brands for GM Realize economies of scale from consolidation of brand management, advertising, dealership networks. The above mentioned steps seek to consolidate the GM brand network and dealer network into a more nimble organization. These mergers of core brands eliminate costly dealer-lawsuits from shuttering a brand, while being able to invest in our core surviving brands. The steps outlined above are far overdue and could be the jolt GM needs in order to reinvigorate their core business. The above outlined plan takes 10 brands and marketing strategies and whittles them down to 3 global brands. The surviving names will be able to receive more attention and investment from GM and will be able to produce more relevant products. By merging brands and product lines the cost to GM can be drastically slashed since most brands carry similar products under different brand names. The surviving corporate brands would be Buick,Chevrolet, Holden, Opel, and Cadillac, a drastic and necessary shift in response to market realities. I believe the plan put forth is the best way forward for GM and allows it to realize its many core strengths and keep their most prestigious brands. By cutting the brand and dealership network and merging divisions significant synergies and cost savings can be formed it also allows GM to better respond to market shifts and changes in consumer tastes. This way forward plan seems as though the least harsh and one that could provide the quickest results to the company. This brand consolidation will streamline the entire company allow GM to get rid of non-core factories and duplicative management for its stable of 12 brands and allow the company to better focus on core brands. Toyota does with three brands, what GM attempts to do with 12. GM needs to keep 4 to 5 core brands and then heavily invest in creating a full line up for each of their strength brands. 2-4 good cars per brand does not do well anymore. This is not the 1950’s and GM’s dated brand strategy must go. There will be immediate and long terms savings goals from factory/management consolidation of these many brands. Since a lot of the brand consolidation mentioned revolves around brands that each sell the same products under different brand name banners the consolidation should be common sense and is long overdue. In addition to those mentioned steps GM must go through its line up and cut underperformers from production, do you really need 5 types of GMC Yukon’s to choose from? A faster switch to flex fuel automobiles and hybrid power trains will lift the company and boost sales, but GM must also cut most of its behemoth SUVs from the lineup to focus on fuel efficient crossovers. The changes we have experienced with gas prices and the automotive market are here to stay, it is time GM realized that. I believe if all of the consolidation steps above are taken and GM invests in those core brands and introduces new products while streamlining factories and duplicative management that they will ultimately become a stronger corporation than even Toyota is today. |
|
You are here:
Forums
Future Vehicles A Vision of Buick's Future...
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
