You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Ford Edge
Ford Edge Real World MPG

37 messages, Last post on May 26, 2009 at 6:02 AM
You are in the Ford Edge Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: tureblueedge (May 25, 2009 8:07 pm) You have to admit driving the edge for comfort and mobility is a big improvement over any small rice burner. To me the safety factor alone is worth the change. I have a 2005 Freestyle they changed the drivetrain on the Edge to a 6 speed TRANS and a bigger 3.4--- 6 cylinder where the Freestyle has a 3.0 six motor and a CVT transmission 2 years ago. In mostly city I average 20 highway alone, close to 28 straight Hwy, mixed 22-23mpg. Why Ford moved away from the CVT and the 3.0 motor is a mystery. In this day and age of never knowing when gas will spike back to 4.00 again. It would proablly have been a smart idea and offered the CVT and 3.0 as an option in the Flex,Taurus X and The Edge and let consumers decide what the wanted in mileage options. With the Freestyle (which is same as Taurus X as they renamed it 2 years ago )which is like the Flex anyway interior wise and size as well as the Edge. With my Freestyle filled with 6 people power is never lacking. We love it !!!!!!!!!! Enjoy the Flex they are sharp .I see a lot on the roads these days.
|
|
|
Replying to: tureblueedge (May 25, 2009 8:07 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: finelinevan (May 26, 2009 3:29 am) Not really. The CVT was expensive. Ford's competitors have 3.5L V6s so Ford had to upgrade to stay competitive. The CVT probably can't take the torque of the 3.5L and they can't afford to keep the 3.0L much longer at low volumes. 6 speed automatics also reduce the CVT FE advantage. Just not enough potential demand to justify the added expense. |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Ford Edge
Ford Edge Real World MPG
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Ford Edge



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats