- #32 of 53
-
Re: Tires [harop]
by paisan
-
Mar 19, 2007 (3:17 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: harop (Mar 18, 2007 9:01 pm)
I've owned a lot of tires over the years and there are major differences. I am also comparing them to my truck when I had new Contis on. The Conties were fine in rain, dry on-road but were horrible offroad and in snow.
-mike
|
- #33 of 53
-
Re: Tires [paisan]
by paisan
-
Mar 19, 2007 (1:58 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: paisan (Mar 19, 2007 3:17 am)
I've used a lot of AT tires on my SUVs over the years and this isn't a placebo effect for sure.
-mike
|
- #34 of 53
-
Re: Tires [paisan]
by mick14
-
Mar 21, 2007 (6:20 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: paisan (Mar 19, 2007 1:58 pm)
Try the BFG TA/KO tires. I have them and they seem to be rock solid. I think the new compound is 10-ply. They used
to be 8-ply. They work good in everything but snow and ice........ 
|
- #35 of 53
-
Re: Tires [mick14]
by paisan
-
Mar 21, 2007 (6:27 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: mick14 (Mar 21, 2007 6:20 pm)
Yeah TA/KOs are great, my buddy runs them. I couldn't go larger than stock so I stuck with the Bridgestones.
-mike
|
- #36 of 53
-
Release Date
by think38
-
Apr 02, 2007 (10:02 am)
-
|
Anybody know when the 2008s will be available?
And no, I don't want to read about brake problems on a 2004 truck (four model years later).
|
- #37 of 53
-
Re: Release Date [think38]
by paisan
-
Apr 02, 2007 (10:25 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: think38 (Apr 02, 2007 10:02 am)
Haven't heard of a release date yet, looking forward to it myself. Although I'm really looking forward to the 2010 model.
-mike
|
- #38 of 53
-
Re: Release Date [paisan]
by razorthunder
-
Apr 05, 2007 (2:08 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: paisan (Apr 02, 2007 10:25 am)
I agree. The 2008s aren't much change from the previous years models, just a few interior changes, even Edmunds criticized it for not being competitive enough in terms of different engine options and styling upgrades.
Think38 - Those people with previous years brake and paint problems, just need to accept and live with it; since they will all be finally solved in the 2008 models. Bottomline, they know the risks invloved when purchasing a Nissan. So if problems occur, they should live with it.
|
- #39 of 53
-
PRO-4X
by cory8899
-
Apr 06, 2007 (10:19 am)
-
|
|
The 2008 Nissan titan is more than changing enough to compare with its competitors. Take any of the toyota line and put it next to the new Nissan Titan trim level (Pro -4x) and then talk about how it doesn't compare. Titan or tundra????? TITAN ANY DAY!
|
- #40 of 53
-
Re: PRO-4X [cory8899]
by driver56
-
Apr 07, 2007 (7:25 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: cory8899 (Apr 06, 2007 10:19 am)
I know this is off topic, but I cannot resist. Every single time I drive my Frontier 4x4 Nismo I can't help but smile. Titan's little brother is nothing less than a hoot for my wife and I to drive, wherever it may be. In my mind, there is no competition. There is no "perfect" vehicle, yet this is the closest to it that I have ever known.
Keep it up Nissan! And thanks Titan.
Now I'll head on back to the Frontier board.
Mick
|
- #41 of 53
-
Re: PRO-4X [driver56]
by cory8899
-
Apr 09, 2007 (8:12 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: driver56 (Apr 07, 2007 7:25 pm)
The frontier 4x4 is definitly a good vehicle; Especially being the NISMO. Your right about there not being a perfect vehicle, everyone has there own personal preference. I used to think that the titans might have been over priced, but once i took a minute to read up a little bit on the specs i started to realize that its priced right. And you get the Nissan name which means that it will last you more than a long time. Would you say that you might would look into gettin into a Titan?
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Pickups 
