Ask the Car People.SM


Article Comments 2007 Half-Ton Pickups Comparison

259 messages,  Last post on Nov 02, 2007 at 3:16 AM

You are in the Toyota Tundra Forum.

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Silverado 1500, Nissan Titan, Toyota Tundra, Truck

Article comments for Comparison Test: 2007 Half-Ton Pickup Trucks - For almost two weeks, we drove all three trucks in a variety of terrain including urban crush, freeways and gravel roads. We loaded and unloaded them, poked and prodded them, and even dyno-tested them. (more)

Messages Page 5 of 27

#32 of 259 Re: Rocky [drfill] by rockylee

Jan 30, 2007 (5:36 am)

Replying to: drfill (Jan 28, 2007 9:33 am)
DrFill,
 
I can see why the Tundra won based on the comparo. What "Utility" advantage did the Tundra have over the Silverado ??????
 
I'm very interested to hear your answer......
 
Rocky

#33 of 259 Rocky by drfill

Jan 30, 2007 (7:43 am)

Seems like you answered your own question, since you said you can see why the Tundra won.
 
  If you read the article, the answer is pretty clear.
 
  The drivetrain seemed to be the difference, to me. No scrubs from Toyota. Looks like GM nickeled and dimed right where a driver would easily notice.
 
  With such vehicles, confidence is a pretty big selling point, and the GM powertrain sapped their confidence, while Toyota inspired it. Big difference.
 
  The Chevy might be able to do everything the Toyota can, but it didn't inspire confidence.
 
  Went to the Auto Show this weekend, and was impressed by the styling, interior, damped tailgate of the Tundra.
 
  I don't think there is a comparison in style. The Chevy looks like it is targeting a older generation. Looks dated, and too conservative. Not 21st century style. The Toyota is stylish, without being cartoonish. I think Ford, Dodge, and Toyota all have style, where the Chevy lacks.
 
  DrFill

#34 of 259 Re: Rocky [drfill] by gearhead1

Jan 30, 2007 (9:02 am)

Replying to: drfill (Jan 30, 2007 7:43 am)
I don't think there is a comparison in style. The Chevy looks like it is targeting a older generation. Looks dated, and too conservative. Not 21st century style.
 
I think the word your looking for is "stodgy". The new Chevy is very, very, stodgy especially the interior. The 4 second lag in the engine, 4 speed tranny and the stodgy interior should keep those loyal 70 year old domestic buyers where the belong, with GM.
 
If anyone in this segment wants the biggest baddest truck, there is only one choice. The Tundra of course.

#35 of 259 Re: Rocky [drfill] by rockylee

Jan 30, 2007 (12:36 pm)

Replying to: drfill (Jan 30, 2007 7:43 am)
Seems like you answered your own question, since you said you can see why the Tundra won.
 
Well I was being sarcastic which I guess you didn't cattch.
 
If I take a GMC Sierra Denali and run it against a base 2WD Tundra in off roading, utility, luxury, quality, the answer is obvious who's going to win. The edmunds comparo DrFill was exactly like that. The Silverado wasn't a Z-71 version and lacked the LTZ's leather, navigation, and other nice touches. It was a apples to oranges comparo. The Titan also lacked it's top models trim
 
Give me a break.........
 
The drivetrain seemed to be the difference, to me. No scrubs from Toyota. Looks like GM nickeled and dimed right where a driver would easily notice.
  
  With such vehicles, confidence is a pretty big selling point, and the GM powertrain sapped their confidence, while Toyota inspired it. Big difference.
  
  The Chevy might be able to do everything the Toyota can, but it didn't inspire confidence.
 
Well I suppose everyone else must of felt different as they named the Silverado North American Truck of the year. Anyone can win when they have one apple going up against oranges.
 
 Went to the Auto Show this weekend, and was impressed by the styling, interior, damped tailgate of the Tundra.
  
  I don't think there is a comparison in style. The Chevy looks like it is targeting a older generation. Looks dated, and too conservative. Not 21st century style. The Toyota is stylish, without being cartoonish. I think Ford, Dodge, and Toyota all have style, where the Chevy lacks
 
The Tundra looks like a glorified american "wanna be" truck. It lacks the warranty, interior quality, sophistication of the GMT-900's. The Sierra Denali, has a 400 hp 6.2 powertrain and can easily out muscle the new Tundra. The 400 hp. Vortec max 6.2 will be available this fall on the Silverado. I also hear nothing about a hybrid version of the Tundra. The Tundra also has that cartoonish 4 door non-crewmax cab which looks weird as the top rear corner of the cab looks awful. The crewmax looks better but will cost you more dough and why buy one over a Sierra Denali ?
 
Rocky

#36 of 259 Re: Rocky [gearhead1] by rockylee

Jan 30, 2007 (12:42 pm)

Replying to: gearhead1 (Jan 30, 2007 9:02 am)
Functionally, the Tundra's cabin is outstanding, with plenty of handy bins and that versatile center console, but the design of the instrumentation display wasn't universally loved. Nor was the Tundra interior's combination of silver, gray and black plastics that looked soft but felt hard. When we drove off-road, however, the Tundra's interior didn't attract nearly as much dust as the Silverado's nicer-looking cabin.
 
After piloting the Tundra, the Silverado gives the impression of tidier dimensions. It's a bit easier to step up into the Chevy's cab, so the lack of a grab handle on the driver side isn't an issue (although a curious omission nonetheless). The interior shares some of the basic style of the previous-generation GMT800 GM trucks, but almost none of that truck's cheap detailing. Overall, it feels like a right-size truck, perfect for all-around use.
 
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=119281
 
If anyone in this segment wants the biggest baddest truck, there is only one choice. The Tundra of course.
 
gearhead1,
 
Just a bit biased are we.
 
Give me a Sierra Denali, and I will out do the Tundra's in every test.
 
-Rocky

#37 of 259 Re: Rocky [rockylee] by saddaddy

Jan 30, 2007 (12:53 pm)

Replying to: rockylee (Jan 30, 2007 12:42 pm)
No comparison is more "apples-to-oranges" than comparing the Sierra Denali to any 1/2 ton other than the Mark LT.

#38 of 259 Re: Rocky [rockylee] by gearhead1

Jan 30, 2007 (1:49 pm)

Replying to: rockylee (Jan 30, 2007 12:42 pm)
Just a bit biased are we.
 
Nothing but the facts. You want the best powertrain, you'll be buying a Toyota 5.7 6 speed. GM can't touch it and that's a fact. Every publication knows it. GM rushed their truck to market to take Truck of the year with nothing in the market to compete with it and surprise they won.
 
Give me a Sierra Denali, and I will out do the Tundra's in every test
 
The only engine I can find under the Denali at the GMC web site is a 6.0 liter Vortec 300hp, 360ft lbs of torque (performance package boosts it to 345hp). Hardly a competitor to the Tundra 5.7. They must be keeping that engine a secret. It's hard
to sell a engine when you don't even advertise it, or are you talking about some fantasy engine in the future. How much is the Denali with that engine? Base MSRP on a Denali even with that engine is $40,000 plus. You can get a 07 Tundra Crew Max 4x4 5.7 liter 6 speed for that. it's not even a comparison. Who in their right mind would even consider a Denali. That must be why they don't sell many.
 
Please tell me where this engine (That beats the 5.7) is on the GMC website.
 
gmc.com

#39 of 259 North American Truck of the Year by alpha01

Jan 30, 2007 (4:37 pm)

The Tundra wasn't even eligible, so how is that an apples-apples comparison.
 
~alpha

#40 of 259 Rocky by drfill

Jan 30, 2007 (4:59 pm)

Don't have a problem with the Silverado, from all reports it is splitting hairs to find out which truck is better. Some like the Tundra, some the Chevy. That's fine. I'm sure Toyota is more than fine with that!
 
   The NATOTY award didn't necessarily include test drives, or more importantly, tests on their intended-use like towing, and off-road.
 
   I'm not prepared to say the Chevy or the Tundra is the best. But Tundra is a prime suspect. And that's just fine by 'Yota.
 
   I sat in the Tundra at the Auto Show this weekend, and the Regular Cab is cavernous! And I'm 6'4". The door is like a barn door. And the interior doesn't lack quality, it is similar to other Toyota vehicles. It just has a funny paint scheme. It is original. Not better or worse than others, just different.
 
   What's important is it has passed Ram, F-150 and Titan, and now can sit at the table with the new Chevy, which had to pull out all the stops on.
 
   Toyota did a nice job, and Chevy did a nice job. I would buy the Toyota because it's better looking, and is at least as good dynamically.
  
  DrFill

#41 of 259 Re: Rocky [drfill] by toykicks

Jan 30, 2007 (7:20 pm)

Replying to: drfill (Jan 30, 2007 4:59 pm)
Truck trend just tested the new yukon denali with the 6.2 engine. The truck looks nice it averaged 12.8 mpg on their test and requires premium. Engine is rated at 380hp & 417 lbft of torque. towing cap is 7900
 
The sierra denali is another story though
 
link title
 

Messages Page 5 of 27

To POST a message, please Sign In.

Advertisement

Browse by Category

Browse by Vehicle
   View All Vehicles

Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
View All Topics

Edmunds Community

Advertisement