Article Comments 2007 Half-Ton Pickups Comparison

259 messages, Last post on Nov 02, 2007 at 2:16 AM

You are in the Chevrolet Silverado & GMC Sierra Forum. Your Host is kcram

What is this discussion about? Chevrolet Silverado 1500, Nissan Titan, Toyota Tundra, Truck

Article comments for Comparison Test: 2007 Half-Ton Pickup Trucks - For almost two weeks, we drove all three trucks in a variety of terrain including urban crush, freeways and gravel roads. We loaded and unloaded them, poked and prodded them, and even dyno-tested them. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 20 of 26: 1; ...; 17; 18; 19; 20; 21; 22; 23; ...; 26; Prev; Next; Last

#190 of 259 All that's saying is that the previous Tundra by obyone May 19, 2007 (10:40 am)
owners never did like that anemic 4.7. Replies to this message: ggesq (May 19, 2007 10:55 am) obyone (May 19, 2007 1:04 pm)
#191 of 259 Re: All that's saying is that the previous Tundra [obyone] by ggesq May 19, 2007 (10:55 am)
Replying to: obyone (May 19, 2007 10:40 am) that could be one explanation. the other is for the bargain of 2k more, you can get extra hp and a 6sp tranny? Replies to this message: obyone (May 19, 2007 1:04 pm)
#192 of 259 Re: All that's saying is that the previous Tundra [ggesq] by obyone May 19, 2007 (1:04 pm)
Replying to: ggesq (May 19, 2007 10:55 am) Not to mention a full sized half ton.
#193 of 259 Re: We don't need Tundras. [captainmatty] by dreasdad May 19, 2007 (3:10 pm)
Replying to: captainmatty (May 17, 2007 11:18 pm) The chevy S-10 was built by Isuzu, which is probably why it was so tough!!!!!!!!! Replies to this message: kcram (May 19, 2007 6:04 pm) razorthunder (May 20, 2007 4:49 pm)
#194 of 259 Re: We don't need Tundras. [dreasdad] by kcram HOST May 19, 2007 (6:04 pm)
Replying to: dreasdad (May 19, 2007 3:10 pm) No, the Chevy LUV was an Isuzu...the S-10 was all GM. kcram - Pickups Host Replies to this message: razorthunder (May 20, 2007 4:49 pm)
#195 of 259 Re: We don't need Tundras. [kcram] by razorthunder May 20, 2007 (4:49 pm)
Replying to: kcram (May 19, 2007 6:04 pm) The Chevrolet LUV was a rebadged Isuzu KB light truck. Sales began in the USA in March of 1972 as a response to the Toyota Hi-Lux and the Datsun pickup, as well as Ford's Mazda-built Courier. The LUV was replaced in the United States by the US-built Chevrolet S-10 after 1982. Chevrolet stopped selling the LUV in the USA after 1982 in favor of their own S-10 compact pickup, but Isuzu picked up sales in the US as the Isuzu Pup that same year.
#196 of 259 Interesting article by obyone May 23, 2007 (1:26 pm)
http://www.autospies.com/news/Did-Toyota-Stretch-the-Truth-in-the-New-Tundra-Ads- -13554/ Replies to this message: razorthunder (May 23, 2007 4:46 pm) obyone (May 23, 2007 5:45 pm)
#197 of 259 Re: Interesting article [obyone] by razorthunder May 23, 2007 (4:46 pm)
Replying to: obyone (May 23, 2007 1:26 pm) Personally, I don't plan to take my truck up a see-saw with 10,000 lbs and then slam on my brakes, like the commercial shows. I understand its just marketing and not fact. Plus, since the article criticized the Toyota brakes. I was wondering the dimensions of brakes on GM trucks? Toyota Tundra listed theirs at 13.9 for the front diameter and 13.6 for the rear diameter at a curb weight of 5540 for a 5.7 Double Cab. I went to the GM website and ironically they don't list the size of the brakes but the curb weights are about the same weight. I was hoping to do a curb weight to brake size ratio comparison and see who comes up on top. Replies to this message: obyone (May 23, 2007 5:45 pm)
#198 of 259 Re: Interesting article [razorthunder] by obyone May 23, 2007 (5:45 pm)
Replying to: razorthunder (May 23, 2007 4:46 pm) I agree. With your titan I wouldn't do any kind of brake testing that's fo sho.
#199 of 259 Re: We don't need Tundras. [captainmatty] by idriveasunbird May 24, 2007 (7:58 pm)
Replying to: captainmatty (May 17, 2007 11:18 pm) I don't know how accurate your logic is on that. You don't see a whole lot of 1960 Ferrari's driving around either. It is not due to the fact that they were not quality made automobiles, it is a purely a reflection on how many of those automobiles were produced. The HUGE number of Chevy, Dodge and most notably Ford pickup trucks produced in the past 40 years completely dwarfs the number of Toyota pickups produced. The numbers are not anywhere near each other so comparing the quality of the truck based solely on the number you see on the road today will not produce a valid judgement. If you are suggesting the Tundra motor will wear out before the current Ford, Dodge and Chevy motors I think you will be very mistaken. As far as the actual truck is concerned these are all very similiarly put together with the virtually the same steel and aluminum. Japanese products being more quality oriented than American products is no myth, their products are engineered better than ours today which has a direct effect on quality. Replies to this message: captainmatty (May 25, 2007 12:24 am) andy82471 (May 25, 2007 9:45 am) rorr (May 25, 2007 10:43 am)