You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Crossover SUV Comparison

7122 messages, Last post on Nov 09, 2009 at 1:24 PM
You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Jan 12, 2009 6:49 pm) Sorry, I said the M word again. Seriously, though, the two desires here are space and value pricing, and the simple fact is a minivan wins big in both areas. Going from a Suburban to a Lambda you lose about 20 cubit feet. Going from a Suburban to a Sienna you actually gain 10+ cubic feet. That plus a van will be a whole lot cheaper. $22-35k instead of $30-40k or so.
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Jan 13, 2009 11:25 am) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: volkov (Jan 13, 2009 1:23 pm) To the original poster, if interested (and you may not be), check out the SUVs vs. Minivans forum. To do so, click this link, it will take you directly to it.
|
|
|
How quickly things change in the crossover world - a year ago when it was the hottest site around, you'd get strung up for mentioning the "m" word. Now you get strung up for saying minivans may not be perfect for everyone. I was responding to Juice (ateixera) and made no reference or disrespect to your post so please stand down to alert level yellow. This was a joke referring to an old very gentlemanly disagreement we had between the two of us long ago, when I was still seriously considering the AWD Sienna. BTW, Juice and I are close - he even knows how much weight I've lost in the past 3 months so I'm sure he didn't need anyone to come to his defence. I was trying to be helpful, in part because as you say, the OP hasn't told us how many passengers and what gear they would be hauling. If he requires 3 rows and a long cargo area, my comments will hopefully be helpful. If he doesn't, I don't think I did any harm. For the record, we personally want AWD and I have lamented here before that I wish there were more AWD minivan options. The Sienna is the only deal in town, and up here in Canada models and options are limited and pricing exhorbitant. That's why I didn't get one as our city family hauler, well, that and the fact my wife doesn't want a minivan.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: volkov (Jan 13, 2009 5:10 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Jan 13, 2009 6:56 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: coldcranker (Jan 13, 2009 7:22 pm) We may downsize to a *gasp* hatchback on our next ride though. Maybe Nissan will remake the Axxess by then. There's been a minivan here for two decades now (well, one per decade). |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: coldcranker (Jan 13, 2009 7:22 pm) If anyone would like to challenge that based on the fact that I'm pro-minivan, meet me in the back-alley and we'll fight. I'll bring 6 of my large friends, since we'll all fit in the Odyssey. You can bring 4 big ones and a couple of kids in your crossover. I like my odds. Tongue-in-cheek, of course. TheGraduate.
|
|
|
Replying to: coldcranker (Jan 13, 2009 7:22 pm) I love the utility of a wagon or minivan with car line handling and reasonable gas mileage. The T-X slightly removes some of the stigma for a guy. I call it the "Daddy-wagon". Oh, and the Taurus X is a super vehicle as well. Besides my family and kids loving to ride in the car, all my friends want to carpool with me when we go mountain biking. I can get six people and six big bikes on the car (four in back, two on top). |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: thegraduate (Jan 13, 2009 8:56 pm) Thats the thing about the Freestyle and TaurusX. That rear-most seat third seat is usable by anyone under 6' tall. I've used mine that way. It really is 7-passenger.
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 GMC Acadia
2009 Mitsubishi Outlander
2010 Subaru Forester
2009 Hyundai Santa Fe
2009 Ford Taurus X
2011 Toyota RAV4
2010 Nissan Rogue
2010 Honda Accord Crosstour
2010 Dodge Journey



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats