Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Crossover SUV Comparison
7127 messages, Last post on Nov 28, 2009 at 8:31 PM
You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
|
|---|---|
|
Replying to: volkov (Sep 02, 2008 9:39 am) Forester X gets 20/26 Rav4 - 6 gets 19/26 Forester XT 19/24 " The point is that you get the fuel economy with the performance in the V6 Rav4. Getting a 4-banger in the sluggish Forrester makes you feel cheated on fuel economy compared to the V6 Rav4.
|
|
|
Replying to: coldcranker (Sep 02, 2008 11:13 am) The RAV4 V6 will have plenty of reserve power, so if the buyer plans to haul a big payload or tow a trailer, it will be the better choice. We have that exact same V6 in our van.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 02, 2008 11:28 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: coldcranker (Sep 02, 2008 11:33 am) It's other parts of the vehicle that I had issues with. Poor rear visibility. Look at the massive D-pillar, and high rear window. Wrong-way rear gate blocks the curb (duh!). Spare on the rear blocks the view even more, and even for 2009 to get rid of those you have to accept an even bigger problem - run-flats. This poor guy is the latest victim: http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.ee93e3c/8568 The RAV4's interior is also half a step behind the others in its class, and well behind the Sienna IMHO. Plus when you evaluate the handling, body roll, AWD system, etc, that's where Subaru really wins. Who was it, Lotus? One of those exotic brands is building a new car and they are using the 2GR-FE V6 engine. That's no surprise. In the RAV4, it's a great engine looking for a better host vehicle.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 02, 2008 11:43 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: coldcranker (Sep 02, 2008 12:24 pm) Toyota simply puts a priority on isolation and comfort. Period. The job of the suspension is to absorb bumps and keep the vehicle on its intended path, quietly. Isolation is a priority over feedback, so the steering is novacaine-numb. I like my Sienna but I'll admit, the steering has less feedback than my Nintendo Wii Remote. Seriously. None. Some critics say it's too light, that's actuall not true - it is well weighted. It's just not connected, the feel. Like you operate a joystick or a video game, one without the force feedback feature. This is good in some ways - you don't feel jolts, speed bumps, irregularities in the road. This can reduce fatigue. Your passengers nap peacefully in quiet comfort. Ok, what do you trade-off for that quiet isolation? Feel and feedback. You can't tell when the tires are about to break traction, they just do, then the intrusive traction control nanny raises the red flag and ends the party. There will be no exceeding this limit, and we're not going to tell you where it is, nor when you are getting close.  That's the best way I can put it. Funny thing is, ultimately they do handle well, albeit with more lean. Grip is fine. It's just you have no feedback to know what the tires are doing. True for the brakes as well, even for the throttle-by-wire for that matter. That's just how Toyotas are. Isolated. Basically think BMW-style feedback, where you can see the limits coming, even feel the texture of the road, then think the exact opposite. That's Toyota. Note that in the C&D comparo the Sienna actually matched the lateral grip of the Odyssey, but read the text of the article and you'd never know. Sorry if my explanation is hard to understand. A Toyota can be driven fast, perhaps even just as fast as car B, but it will not really reward you with driving fun the way a (insert your favorite car here) will. So, why did I get one? Because the Sienna is a phenomenal vehicle for the other 7 passengers. Plus you don't drive your family vehicle the way you'd drive a BMW.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 29, 2008 4:53 pm) The lease price I got was exactly the same as the 6cyl rav. Actually one quote I got was substantially lower but the reviews for this dealership are very negative so I have a feeling they won't honor that quote: 36 month lease/ 15k miles $0 down / $337 which includes tax. The other quote I got seems more realistic: $0 down / $339+ tax Does that price seem fair? I'm in the Denver area. thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: tigerlily3 (Sep 02, 2008 7:48 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: ateixeira (Sep 02, 2008 1:09 pm) Sorry if my explanation is hard to understand. A Toyota can be driven fast, perhaps even just as fast as car B, but it will not really reward you with driving fun the way a (insert your favorite car here) will. So, why did I get one? Because the Sienna is a phenomenal vehicle for the other 7 passengers. Plus you don't drive your family vehicle the way you'd drive a BMW. For those who only have one vehicle, the Odyssey is a good compromise. It doesn't ride as quietly as the Toyota or as smoothly either, but instead, its a lot like a big Accord; a benefit to many (especially me, an Accord driver  ). How many miles do you have on the 'yota now, a-t? |
|
|
tigerlily3: residuals for the Subaru Forester are fantastic. Something like 59% for 3 years 45k miles, 61% for 3 years 36k miles, depending on the model. Ask car_man, but they're best in class. Most competitors are around 52% or less. I would stick with premium fuel, though. They recommend it for a reason. See if you can get Costco gas, or get a Shell gas card to offset the difference. The XT gets taller gearing, so at highway speeds the RPMs are kept low, lower in fact than the base engine. I believe Toyota does the same with the V6 (taller than the 2.4l 4 banger). That's why you don't see a big mileage penalty in either case. Our Sienna is close to 14k miles now but it's in the shop because a Chipmunk chewed up our wiring harness.  Our Forester only has 1400 miles or so. We like them both, each definitely has its own strengths. We plan to keep both cars for the very long term. I'm quite pleased with our fleet, actually, probably the most satisfied I've ever been with my cars. Our 3rd car is a 1993 Miata and it just keeps on going. I'm thinking about trading it, but I ask myself why? It's perfectly fine. It is the slowest of our 3 cars, but it's just for my commutes. Miata is a great city car. Sienna makes a great highway/trip car. Forester is a good compromise if you do both. 
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 GMC Acadia
2010 Mitsubishi Outlander
2010 Subaru Forester
2009 Hyundai Santa Fe
2009 Ford Taurus X
2011 Toyota RAV4
2010 Nissan Rogue
2010 Honda Accord Crosstour
2010 Dodge Journey
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
