Sign In Join 



Crossover SUV Comparison

7120 messages,  Last post on Nov 06, 2009 at 8:28 AM

You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? GMC Acadia, Mitsubishi Outlander, Subaru Forester, Hyundai Santa Fe, Ford Taurus X, Toyota RAV4, Nissan Rogue, Honda Accord Crosstour, Dodge Journey, Car Buying, Car Comparisons, SUV


Messages Page 671 of 713
1
...
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
...
713
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6698 of 7120
Re: Saw Ford Flex Today [ateixeira] by coldcranker
Aug 04, 2008 (6:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Aug 04, 2008 9:26 am)

Joking about the whole motorcycle=CUV coolness factor. However, most people have a psychological problem with minivans and their image.
#6699 of 7120
Re: Saw Ford Flex Today [coldcranker] by ateixeira
Aug 06, 2008 (5:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: coldcranker (Aug 04, 2008 6:16 pm)

I'm not insecure.
 
 
 
Truth is, both have their uses. Our Forester has been great, and it will be our only snow vehicle. The clearance and AWD should come in handy, plus our mileage keeps improving. We were getting 34mpg on one all-highway stretch.
#6700 of 7120
Re: Saw Ford Flex Today [coldcranker] by bobw3
Aug 07, 2008 (6:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: coldcranker (Aug 04, 2008 6:16 pm)

It's really hard for me to understand why driving an Acadia or other big CUV improves someone's "image" as compared to driving an Odyssey or Sienna? I mean when they're sitting in their CUV with their family cramped back in 2nd and 3rd rows, doesn't make them feel worse than if they were driving an Odyssey with a whole lot more space to spread out inside and 50% more cargo space? Maybe I'm just too logical in my thinking?? It just seems to me if you're going to spend $30K on a family vehicle and are going to use all three rows of seats, unless you really, reallly need AWD, why would you not buy an Odyssey or Sienna...just because of the perceived image??? My brain stopped thinking like that after I graduated high school!!
#6701 of 7120
Re: Saw Ford Flex Today [bobw3] by coldcranker
Aug 07, 2008 (11:49 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Aug 07, 2008 6:41 am)

It may be silly thinking, but I can't count how many people I've personally seen (and heard of through marketing statistics tossed around) that say they wouldn't be caught dead in a minivan, instead opting for a big SUV/truck with half the MPG because it makes them feel like King of the Road, or it projects a tougher image to those around. We have a semi-nerdy Freestyle which we love, and we have an '05 2wd Ford F150 pickup used mostly for short trips or hauling, bought for $18,400 brand new. For me, I do like the added safety in the F150, the over-engineered ruggedness, the cheapness for a new vehicle with V8 and air conditioning, and the ability to toss big loads in the back. One thing you can say about the cheapest model of F150 is that you really get your money's worth. I would hate its MPG on long trips, but the Freestyle is there for that. Only short trips for the F150!!! For people who drive SUVs and pickups long distances every day, that is ridiculous at $3.80/gallon gas, but they like the "commanding road presence" and commute long distances in them to feed some ego issues. Those big vehicles have supplied the Saudis with plenty of money to fund Bin Laden-style causes.
 
About the CUVs, the real subject here, there was an article saying that CUVs sales were surprisingly down as people now want cars with a good-size trunk instead of these station wagons on steroids. Many of these CUVs (Freestyle for one) gets better MPG than a lot of big cars out there, so I don't completely understand why CUVs aren't a little more popular right now.
#6702 of 7120
Re: Saw Ford Flex Today [coldcranker] by saabturboid
Aug 07, 2008 (12:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: coldcranker (Aug 07, 2008 11:49 am)

coldcranker wrote:
 
About the CUVs, the real subject here, there was an article saying that CUVs sales were surprisingly down as people now want cars with a good-size trunk instead of these station wagons on steroids. Many of these CUVs (Freestyle for one) gets better MPG than a lot of big cars out there, so I don't completely understand why CUVs aren't a little more popular right now.
 
I am not surprised CUV sales are down. We have an '05 AWD Freestyle that we love, but have been bit hard by gas prices. The computer says the Freestyle only manages 16.5mpg with mixed city/suburban driving. On long road trips it typically manages 22mpg. This is lower than some other Freestyle owners report, but I believe it is most likely due to it being an AWD model which we do utilize in our long Minnesota winters.
 
By contrast our other car is a 2001 Saab 9-5 wagon. This is classified as a large car with a good sized cargo area. In the same type of city/suburban driving this car manages about 24mpg. On the highway it does better than 30, so by driving it instead of the more roomy Freestyle we increase our MPG by about 8. This is a significant difference for us because we have to drive a lot, so this summer we have been driving the Saab more often and the Freestyle less.
 
We love our Freestyle, but next time we go to buy a car we will likely look for something that gets much better fuel economy. I just wish something roomy like the Freestyle was available with a diesel engine that allowed it to get 30mph on the highway. I don't see why this isn't possible with some diesel cars getting 50mpg on the highway.
 
- Chad
#6703 of 7120
Re: Saw Ford Flex Today [coldcranker] by explorerx4
Aug 07, 2008 (2:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: coldcranker (Aug 07, 2008 11:49 am)

between the cuv's not getting a whole lot better mileage than many suv's and the big decline in suv values, there isn't much incentive to consider one.
my explorer is 6 years old, has 83k on it averaging 16 mpg and runs great.
i am keeping it and bought a sedan with a large trunk.
#6704 of 7120
Re: Saw Ford Flex Today [saabturboid] by coldcranker
Aug 07, 2008 (4:11 pm)
Reply

Replying to: saabturboid (Aug 07, 2008 12:21 pm)

For a reference on the surprising (to some) CUV sales drop: CUV sales down, references Wall St. Jnl.
 
The '01 Saab 9-5 wagon with automatic gets slightly worse MPG than my '05 Freestyle 2wd. ....www.fueleconomy.gov database..... I don't understand why there are some Freestyles (especially AWD versions) that don't get good MPG. I have elaborate theories why some don't, some which sound more like they come from Mel Gibson's character in "Conspiracy Theory, 1997", which in my case involve manufacturing variations and the weakness in the CVT design to fail to control steel belt tension nominal levels. Don't know for sure, but I have some evidence of this. The low MPG in some Freestyles appears to be real, as it affected the first Freestyle that Consumer Reports got a hold of for their first test of it, reporting 12 MPG then! Do you think Ford would ever admit this? Yeah, right. Related conspiracy theory: Ford quit using the CVT because of this design performance weakness in some percentage of vehicles.
#6705 of 7120
Re: Saw Ford Flex Today [coldcranker] by explorerx4
Aug 07, 2008 (5:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: coldcranker (Aug 07, 2008 4:11 pm)

my wife had an '01 saab 9-5se(v6 turbo) wagon for three years. it looked great and got very good gas mileage. it was a horrible vehicle to drive in snow.
#6706 of 7120
Re: Saw Ford Flex Today [bobw3] by ateixeira
Aug 08, 2008 (12:05 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Aug 07, 2008 6:41 am)

Maybe I'm just too logical in my thinking??
 
Amen to that.
 
unless you really, reallly need AWD, why would you not buy an Odyssey or Sienna
 
You can even get AWD on a Sienna, though you'll have to take the run-flats along with it.
 
We like our Forester, but it would be nice if Subaru also offered their Exiga here, i.e. a small minivan to compete with the Mazda5 and Kia Rondo.
 
#6707 of 7120
A scene I'm sure is playing everywhere by volkov
Aug 09, 2008 (9:36 pm)
Reply
I was in the local dealer again recently and while waiting for my salesman, I had the chance to eavesdrop on a conversation going on between the finance manager and a customer. They were a middle aged to retired couple looking to buy a passenger car and trade-in their SUV with 10 months remaining on its lease. They became quite upset when it was explained to them that their vehicle was worthless and in fact, the cheapest thing to do was to pay off the remaining ten payments and then return the SUV. The finance manager was very reasonable and simply tried to explain the realities of residual values and the current market. I have to say that I had no sympathy for the customers. They did not appear unsophistocated or financially disadvantaged but the gentleman couldn't get past the difference between residual value and a guaranteed trade in value. I don't care what any salesman might have said, if leasing costs 2/3 the monthly payment of financing, don't expect a big payout at the end - it's simple common sense. If you want to cut and run earlier, don't expect to get off for free. You will always be upside down on a lease - the current realities just made it worse. The irony here is that the customer isn't the victim, it's the leasing corporations. Leases have in fact gutted the Big 3 to the point they have dropped them or are dropping any incentives on rates since their recent losses are measured in the billion$. The bad news for us is that good lease rates or even leasing itself (especially in Canada) are gone, but the upside is that prices and finance deals for CUV's should be generous for those of us looking to buy in the near future.

Messages Page 671 of 713
1
...
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
...
713
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement