Sign In Join 



Crossover SUV Comparison

7126 messages,  Last post on Nov 18, 2009 at 1:27 PM

You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? GMC Acadia, Mitsubishi Outlander, Subaru Forester, Hyundai Santa Fe, Ford Taurus X, Toyota RAV4, Nissan Rogue, Honda Accord Crosstour, Dodge Journey, Car Buying, Car Comparisons, SUV


Messages Page 667 of 714
1
...
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
...
714
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6655 of 7126
Re: GMC Acadia [kellz] by coldcranker
Jul 21, 2008 (3:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kellz (Jul 19, 2008 9:31 pm)

kellz,
If you want a big one, the Acadia is a good choice. I have an '05 Freestyle (TaurusX ancestor) and it has plenty of room and weighs just under 4000 lbs, getting between 20 and 27 MPG with a smoothe CVT tranny. The Saturn version of the Acadia, the Saturn Outlook, is a little cheaper than an Acadia so I'd check that one out. I think you are right waiting for an '09 model with direct injection. The fuel economy should go up by 1 MPG with direct injection. The '09 Chevy Traverse, yet another flavor of Acadia, comes out soon and might be priced right where the Saturn is. A sale/discount on an Acadia might make it competitive with the Saturn/Chevy versions. The Enclave seems to be for those who like their GMC-clones gold-plated and are willing to pay for it. I usually like to buy my cars stripped of frivolous options, so the base price means a lot to me. I got my Freestyle new 3 years ago for $22,500 at a discount, a base model except for traction control and extra side/roof airbags for safety.
#6656 of 7126
Veracruz handling by baggs32
Jul 21, 2008 (5:31 pm)
Reply
My FIL was complaining about his '07 Veracruz Limited the other night. Specifically the way it handled on the highway and how much body roll/lean it has. He said it rolls/leans so much that he feels he has to slow down around some of the larger bends on the highway. His previous 2 vehicles were Explorers (an '04 and an '06 V8) and he had no complaints about them. At least not with the handling anyway.
 
Anyone else experience this in a VC? I haven't driven it yet and was wondering if the handling was a little sloppy or if he's just not used to it yet. But it has been in his garage nearly a year now.
#6657 of 7126
Re: Veracruz handling [baggs32] by saabturboid
Jul 22, 2008 (7:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: baggs32 (Jul 21, 2008 5:31 pm)

baggs32 wrote:
 
My FIL was complaining about his '07 Veracruz Limited the other night. Specifically the way it handled on the highway and how much body roll/lean it has. He said it rolls/leans so much that he feels he has to slow down around some of the larger bends on the highway. His previous 2 vehicles were Explorers (an '04 and an '06 V8) and he had no complaints about them. At least not with the handling anyway
 
Perhaps that is why it is called Veracruz and not a Veracorner....
 
Seriously though, the Veracruz is a unibody vehicle with suspension tuning to be more like a car than a truck. Your FIL is probably used to truck like cornering from the body on frame Explorer. There is probably nothing wrong with the suspension on the Veracruz. It's just the way it is tuned. Hyundai seems to tune all of their suspensions to the soft side. I have had experience with a Sonata rental that was very soft. It comes down to preference, and since like your FIL I prefer a firmer more confident ride I bought a Ford Freestyle that handles very well.
 
- Chad
#6658 of 7126
Re: GMC Acadia [coldcranker] by bobw3
Jul 22, 2008 (8:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: coldcranker (Jul 21, 2008 3:07 pm)

I can confirm what coldcranker said. My FS FWD is 3 1/2 years old with 62K miles and my MPG is consistently between 20-27. I also paid the same exact price on the X-plan, but mine also has rear AC ceiling vents and dual AC up front. The only problems I had were the rear brake pad and a transmission control module, both of which were covered under warranty. I see nothing out there in the car market that can beat it's MPG and interior space, so I plan on keeping it for a long time...
#6659 of 7126
Re: Veracruz handling [saabturboid] by baggs32
Jul 22, 2008 (8:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: saabturboid (Jul 22, 2008 7:53 am)

There is probably nothing wrong with the suspension on the Veracruz. It's just the way it is tuned. Hyundai seems to tune all of their suspensions to the soft side.
 
That's nearly exaclty what I told him. I was just surprised to hear that the handling was worse than that of a BOF SUV. I tried to talk him into a CX-9 or an Acadia when he was shopping but he liked the VC for some reason. Maybe the price appealed to him more or something.
 
Seriously though, the Veracruz is a unibody vehicle with suspension tuning to be more like a car than a truck.
 
I would say the opposite. A unibody should corner better than, and with less body roll than, a BOF SUV. Mostly because they tend to sit lower to the ground and usually have more complex suspensions.
#6660 of 7126
Re: Veracruz handling [baggs32] by mattandi
Jul 22, 2008 (9:08 am)
Reply

Replying to: baggs32 (Jul 22, 2008 8:32 am)

I try to stay away from characterizations like "better" and "worse" in issues like this. Frankly, anything riding this high will roll and lean more than something riding lower. They're just different and influenced by preference and experience. Your FIL is used to the feel of an Explorer and likes it. No surprise that a CUV like the Veracruz feels different to him. I also tend to notice body roll more in most CUV's and vans rather than in a BOF SUV specifically because of the softer tuning combined with the higher ride. I can see how it could bother someone.
#6661 of 7126
Re: Veracruz handling [baggs32] by saabturboid
Jul 22, 2008 (9:11 am)
Reply

Replying to: baggs32 (Jul 22, 2008 8:32 am)

baggs32 wrote:
 
Seriously though, the Veracruz is a unibody vehicle with suspension tuning to be more like a car than a truck.
  
I would say the opposite. A unibody should corner better than, and with less body roll than, a BOF SUV. Mostly because they tend to sit lower to the ground and usually have more complex suspensions.

 
Body roll is a function of the suspension tuning, not the body structure of a vehicle. On a softly sprung vehicle like the Veracruz you may get more body roll than the more truck-like Explorer. This doesn't actually mean it handles worse, but it leans more into the corners, which I suspect is what your FIL doesn't like. I also suspect that the Veracruz would indeed out handle the Explorer in ultimate grip at the limit, but the Explorer likely feels more planted up until the point it lets loose because of the firmer truck suspension. It is more perception than reality that the Veracruz doesn't handle as well.
 
- Chad
#6662 of 7126
Re: Veracruz handling [baggs32] by coldcranker
Jul 22, 2008 (9:51 am)
Reply

Replying to: baggs32 (Jul 21, 2008 5:31 pm)

About too much body roll in the Veracruz from the previous post: I once had this happen in a Taurus station wagon years ago and I found out the rear anti-roll bar had slipped out of its mounting bracket on the suspension. This reduced roll stiffness greatly, needless to say. Therefore, check to be sure the rear anti-roll bar is attached firmly to its bushing/bracket, and have a mechanic take a look if you don't know what one of those things look like. Its easy to check for this integrity. You might also check the front anti-roll bar as well while you are at it. I doubt if anybody makes a thicker anti-roll bar for this vehicle, but that is many times the solution for these kinds of things. I remember when the Ford Explorer was in the news all the time for rolling over that someone sold a kit to put a thicker one on the Explorer, for example.
#6663 of 7126
Re: Veracruz handling [saabturboid] by baggs32
Jul 22, 2008 (6:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: saabturboid (Jul 22, 2008 9:11 am)

Body roll is a function of the suspension tuning, not the body structure of a vehicle. On a softly sprung vehicle like the Veracruz you may get more body roll than the more truck-like Explorer.
 
I get that, but what I'm saying is that these CUVs, being based on cars, should be expected to lean less than a BOF SUV IMO. Obviously my FIL thought so too. I knew the VC is a copy of a Lexus RX but it seems they should have copied someone elses suspension. Unless one likes that sort of ride.
 
but the Explorer likely feels more planted up until the point it lets loose because of the firmer truck suspension.
 
I have to disagree. Those firmer truck suspensions tend to get somewhat better when some weight is on top of them not when it's just the driver going down the highway. They are built for that sort of duty and excel at it. I have an '06 and it leans around corners a good bit too. I just can't imagine that the VC is worse. If it in fact is then I'd be scared too.
#6664 of 7126
Re: Veracruz handling [baggs32] by coldcranker
Jul 22, 2008 (7:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: baggs32 (Jul 22, 2008 6:23 pm)

Its really all about the stiffness in the anti-roll bars, also know as "sway bars" built into just about every suspension out there.

Messages Page 667 of 714
1
...
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
...
714
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement