Sign In Join 



Crossover SUV Comparison

7122 messages,  Last post on Nov 09, 2009 at 1:24 PM

You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? GMC Acadia, Mitsubishi Outlander, Subaru Forester, Hyundai Santa Fe, Ford Taurus X, Toyota RAV4, Nissan Rogue, Honda Accord Crosstour, Dodge Journey, Car Buying, Car Comparisons, SUV


Messages Page 642 of 713
1
...
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
...
713
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#6410 of 7122
Re: 2009 Pilot [dbt] by aviboy97
Apr 14, 2008 (1:50 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dbt (Apr 14, 2008 12:16 pm)

Very insightful post.
 
I think you hit the nail on the head when you talk about what is important to the Pilot buyer. You would know, since you own one. This is why I still think it will sell 150-200K until, regardless of how it looks.
 
I think passenger room and cargo room is a big issue, considering the Lambdas and the CX-9 have more passenger room, easier to access the 3rd row, and cargo room, making them more practical then the Pilot. While the Pilot gives the appearance of a more useful and larger CUV because of the box shape, it actually falls short. This is unless the new Pilot is indeed larger.
 
As you said, and which I have stated earlier, the fuel economy is going to be an issue here. I highly doubt that the Pilot will be able to show a significant fuel savings, if any, over GM, Mazda or Hyundai. If the competition is indeed on par in terms of fuel economy, then the ride and drive of the Pilot better sway potential buyers from them if the reliability history of the Pilot is not enough. We all know the new Pilot is not going to win any beauty contests, so, that factor is the decision process is not a positive.
#6411 of 7122
Re: 2009 Pilot [dbt] by nxs138
Apr 14, 2008 (2:03 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dbt (Apr 14, 2008 12:16 pm)

Well the 2008 Highlander addressed some of its earlier shortcomings, yet sales are a bit off from this point last year. You could blame the economy, or you could blame the fact that people were expecting something a little sleeker in the redesign. The GM Lambdas have managed to do this right, by a careful combination of classic SUV looks and sleekness in the right areas.
 
So boxy is good for practical uses, but with all the other choices in the market today, seems to me they could have made a little more effort. But to your point, it will still sell well enough.
#6412 of 7122
Re: 2009 Pilot [dbt] by albook
Apr 14, 2008 (6:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: dbt (Apr 14, 2008 12:16 pm)

You've pretty much hit the nail on the head. The new Pilot will definitely be an imporvement over it's predecessor, I'd be pretty certain in all areas except gas mileage. It will be successful, but I don't think anyone could really say that it wouldn't be more successful and have more market share with a slightly sleeker, overall better looking exterior.
#6413 of 7122
Re: 2009 Pilot [nxs138] by ateixeira
Apr 15, 2008 (8:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: nxs138 (Apr 14, 2008 2:03 pm)

Hopefully that puts pressure on Toyota to make simple improvements - like a split 3rd row for starters.
#6414 of 7122
Re: 2009 Pilot [ateixeira] by nxs138
Apr 15, 2008 (3:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Apr 15, 2008 8:35 am)

Yeah, I agree. I liked the new Highlander, even though it didn't have a lot of room behind the 3rd row: I figured that I could always pull down half of the 3rd row to make more room...but nooooo! No split 3rd row. That really turned us off, so here we are with a CX-9. Their loss, I guess.
#6415 of 7122
'09 Pilot- Not so bad? by albook
Apr 15, 2008 (5:36 pm)
Reply
After reading the new Pilot walk around by Edmunds, I have to admit, the Pilot seems to have lived up to most of the expectations. I knew it would grow in size, especially after reading about the increase in behind- third row-cargo space to an impressive 20 cubes. But I was actually thinking it would grow more than just 2 inches in length- more like 3-4. I guess Honda didn't want to mess with successful ingredients- and the size always was right. I was also impressed that legroom was up an inch in the 2nd row, and 2 in the third, pretty good for adding 2 inches in length. However, overall cargo space is still an average 87 cubes. I guess something had to give somewhere. I was also hoping for captains chairs.
 
I will even admit the styling has grown on me a little- but that's probably just from looking at all those marketing photos.
 
I wouldn't say it's best in class, but it's a good imporvement on an already good package. And I'd take it over the Highlander.
#6416 of 7122
Re: '09 Pilot- Not so bad? [albook] by aviboy97
Apr 16, 2008 (6:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: albook (Apr 15, 2008 5:36 pm)

Yes, Honda did improve the Pilot, in terms of passenger space and cargo capacity. Edmunds did say the car was not exciting to drive, and the VCM did cause the vehicle to surging, which is a big problem for Accord owners. Also, they said you really have to slam the throttle to get power, something that is partly caused by having only a 5-speed tranny.
 
It does seem that Honda concentrated more on the utilitarian part of the CUV, rather then the drive. It does not seem like a bad idea. The GM's went for more interior room, more power. Mazda went for the overall drive and interior passenger space, and now Honda went for overall utility.
#6417 of 7122
Fuel Economy by aviboy97
Apr 16, 2008 (9:38 am)
Reply
This is something that Honda is known for, however, they pull up short here with the new Pilot. See how it stacks up against the competition.
 
Pilot. 16/22 250hp/253tq
CX-9. 15/21 273hp/270tq
GM. 16/22 275hp/251tq
Hyundai 15/22 260hp/257tq
 
Considering how much power the Pilot has, IMO, that is what makes the fuel economy not that impressive compared to the competition.
#6418 of 7122
Re: Fuel Economy [aviboy97] by thegraduate
Apr 16, 2008 (11:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: aviboy97 (Apr 16, 2008 9:38 am)

For the Pilot, it seems average; a 6-speed would help. Also, VCM is for 4WD models only.
#6419 of 7122
Re: '09 Pilot- Not so bad? [albook] by ateixeira
Apr 16, 2008 (1:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: albook (Apr 15, 2008 5:36 pm)

That increased cargo space behind the 3rd row is an important upgrade.
 
I think Honda knew they had the Odyssey for the people that wanted space first and foremost, so they intentionally kept the Pilot's dimensions a tad smaller outside.

Messages Page 642 of 713
1
...
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
...
713
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement