Sign In Join 



Crossover SUV Comparison

7126 messages,  Last post on Nov 18, 2009 at 1:27 PM

You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? GMC Acadia, Mitsubishi Outlander, Subaru Forester, Hyundai Santa Fe, Ford Taurus X, Toyota RAV4, Nissan Rogue, Honda Accord Crosstour, Dodge Journey, Car Buying, Car Comparisons, SUV


Messages Page 597 of 713
1
...
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
...
713
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5960 of 7126
Ford Flex Styling by tourguide
Feb 22, 2008 (8:09 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jimmy2x (Feb 22, 2008 7:38 pm)

Since the Flex has come up here, I'll throw my two cents in on this model. It is true that I'm leaning towards the Enclave, which got me looking in the first place with the styling, but I just cannot believe how wrong Ford has gone with the styling of the Flex.
 
Seriously, if this is the best we can expect from Ford then I expect they won't last much longer before declaring bankruptcy. How anybody green lighted that "family truckster" body simply boggles my mind.
 
What got me interested in it was the feature set, but now that I see the styling - forget it. Ford calls it 'distinctive' - well I guess that would be one word to use, not the one I'd choose to be sure. If you look at the old Freestyle body, and the former 500 design you can see the design influence - ugh. Why would I want a vehicle that says - OLD TIMER ON BOARD?
#5961 of 7126
Re: Ford Flex Styling [tourguide] by freealfas
Feb 22, 2008 (3:43 pm)
Reply

Replying to: tourguide (Feb 22, 2008 8:09 pm)

that's one limited view...and buick screams look at my youthful, hmmmm, attitude... oh yeah tiger "drives" one that's it, it's definitely youthful if Tiger drives one... please. yes buicks demographic has lowered...a bit, I'll bet dollars to doughnuts any day of the week a flex is going to appeal to a younger crowd than any enclave will unless it's dubbed up and chrome meshed grilled all unipue auto style and then the bet is off as we all know how people like shiney.
 
squint and look at a flex and see xxxl mini cooper, I'd argue that might not have the OLD TIMER connotations your blinders lead you to see, or not. I'd also argue squint again and see scaled up japanese "cube" vehicles in proportion, are they marketed to OLD TIMER's, I didn't think so.
 
my $.02, your comments are more than a little wide of the mark.
#5962 of 7126
Re: Lambda vs. MDX [jimmy2x] by cason1
Feb 23, 2008 (2:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: jimmy2x (Feb 22, 2008 7:38 pm)

I like the 4-runner and the current model seems to have benefited from Lexus developing a model off the platform. Having said that, I have trouble getting comfortable behind the wheel of the 4-runner...I feel to close to the floor for a vehicle like that. That's just a personal thing though and I imagine it is far from the norm.
 
I have a relative that bought a 2008 4-runner right before I got my MDX. They have extremely close stickers. It will be fun to compare them sitting next to one another when I see him this summer.
#5963 of 7126
Re: Lambda vs. MDX [albook] by cason1
Feb 23, 2008 (2:27 am)
Reply

Replying to: albook (Feb 22, 2008 10:22 am)

I like the RDX...it's a bit quirky and so am I. I would prefer a 6 over the T4. I won't pay what a nicely equipped x3 will cost and I'm not a Volvo fan.
#5964 of 7126
Re: Lambda vs. MDX [cason1] by jimmy2x
Feb 23, 2008 (8:03 am)
Reply

Replying to: cason1 (Feb 23, 2008 2:24 am)

It would seem that the only "real-life" price comparison between the 4Runner and the MDX is to compare base Limited and the MDX w/o any packages since it is difficult to even find a new 4Runner with NAV.
 
4Runner LTD with QV package + Tow TMZ app 34K
 
MDX Base TMZ app 38K
 
At least these are the numbers for SE PA.
 
The seating comment is certainly a fair one and something that does bother a significant amount of people. I'm not sure that it is something that one could get used to if it bothered them initially. Fortunately, neither my wife (who realistically will NEVER actually drive it) were at all uncomfortable in it. Probably cause I am already accustomed to driving with the seat down as far as it will go with the back of the seat tilted back more than most people.
 
This will probably be a very difficult decision. The only other car still in the running is the new Murano which I have yet to drive (and I am aware that the wife thinks it is "ugly" - not that her view would affect my decision ).
#5965 of 7126
Re: Ford Flex Styling [tourguide] by baggs32
Feb 23, 2008 (3:13 am)
Reply

Replying to: tourguide (Feb 22, 2008 8:09 pm)

What got me interested in it was the feature set, but now that I see the styling - forget it. Ford calls it 'distinctive' - well I guess that would be one word to use, not the one I'd choose to be sure.
 
In saying all of that you are proving Ford's point. It's distinctive enough that you noticed it. It's also distinctive enough that you don't like it whereas others, myself included, think it's an excellent design. I'm tired of all these swoopy, curvy CUV designs to be honest but they are here to stay for a while I guess.
 
The Enclave's design seems to cater to the masses, meaning everyone seems to like it or, at the least, some aspect of it. But Buick needs that because they sell in low volumes and they can't afford to be more creative (yes, I don't think the Enclave's styling is particularly creative) or they'll lose sales. Ford can afford to be creative with the Flex because they'll have a similarly sized car-based Explorer on th lot right next to it which you can guarantee will appeal to the masses as all past truck-based Explorers have.
 
Banking Ford's future on one vehicle's design is a gross miscalculation because the picture is much larger than that. Do you think the Enclave is going to save GM too? I'm not looking to start a war with you. Just trying to clear things up a bit.
#5966 of 7126
Re: Ford Flex Styling [baggs32] by circlew
Feb 23, 2008 (8:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: baggs32 (Feb 23, 2008 3:13 am)


 

 
The outside is "fugly but the interior is great!
 
Regards,
OW
#5967 of 7126
Re: Is the Taurus X dying? [baggs32] by albook
Feb 23, 2008 (9:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: baggs32 (Feb 22, 2008 7:31 pm)

The D37 is newer and has more torque and HP, or they could use an EcoBoost.
 
That's definitley a little while off. And the Flex needs a good engine now.
 
That's the opposite of what I was saying. Feature-wise the Flex SEL is comparable to the Acadia SLT 4SB. Price-wise the Flex SEL is $5000 cheaper (FWD models).
 
Acadia is definitely not 5g more expensive than the Flex. The SLE starts just under 30g. the SLT 1 is 33g. The SLT 2 is 36 g. That compares to 28 (or almost 29) 32 (or almost 33) and 34 (or almost 35). I say almost because I can't remember if the prices were something like 32990. So they are definitely close.
 
Having only sat in 2 or 3 Acadias I don't see how you or anyone could feel a GMC product is worth that kind of premium but that doesn't mean you're not allowed to.
 
A lot of it will be style. Sure, there are many who don't like the looks of the Acadia, but it's a more widely accepted look. There will no doubt be more who don't like the look of the Flex, as it looks so different. As for me, there are few cars on the market today whose looks I truely hate (the Tribeca is one of them). I don't think the Flex looks terribly bad. That's just not nearly enough to buy one.
#5968 of 7126
Re: Ford Flex Styling [tourguide] by albook
Feb 23, 2008 (9:35 am)
Reply

Replying to: tourguide (Feb 22, 2008 8:09 pm)

What got me interested in it was the feature set, but now that I see the styling - forget it.
 
You're right. Not that the Flex looks bad, but it doesn't cater to the masses in styling, and that IS what Ford needs. There aren't enough family CUV buyers out there who want to be defferent for Ford to have an entirely seperate vehicle, and still sell numbers similar to a Highlander or Acadia or Pilot. And that IS what Ford wants- to sell in numbers like that. Why is the Buick so stylish? Yes it has to be, because the competition is.Now I'm sure about to get a whole lot of defense from diehard Ford (FS) fans.
#5969 of 7126
Re: Ford Flex Styling [freealfas] by tourguide
Feb 23, 2008 (4:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: freealfas (Feb 22, 2008 3:43 pm)

LOL! I knew that one would draw some fire from the Ford lovers.
 
Paging Mr. Freealfas, the 70's are calling - your station wagon is now ready for pickup.
 
Seriously now, I know this is an opinion - I get that. I just personally hate the styling. It looks old TO ME. The Scion knock-off belongs on a short wheelbase. When it is stretched - it looks like a 70s family truckster - sorry it DOES. I am sure it will have some redeeming qualities inside - the exterior appearance won't be one for me.
 
In all honesty, I like the things Ford has done technology wise - they have been a leader with some really cool features, they just lost my money with the look of their rides - that is all.

Messages Page 597 of 713
1
...
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
...
713
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement