Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
SUVs Crossover SUV Comparison
7122 messages, Last post on Nov 09, 2009 at 1:24 PM
You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
Replying to: robr2 (Jan 30, 2008 10:31 am) I haven't heard what exactly happened but it seems copacetic now. |
|
| The site appeared not to be taking the post. Thank you, Steve, for cleaning up the duplicates. | |
|
Replying to: wamba2000 (Jan 30, 2008 8:21 am) I had never been in a Hyundai until we rented an Azera over Thankgiving. I came away quite favorably impressed. It was very solid and rattle free. The transmission response was a little sluggish I thought, but it was a very nice vehicle.
|
|
|
Replying to: freealfas (Jan 29, 2008 8:33 am) They've been having some hits lately. All they have to do now is not overshoot this huge demand. GM finally has a product that sells like a Honda (supply just meets demand). The Acadia doesn't have a lot of incentives either. I have said I like the Acadia more than the Enclave, but at the autoshow I finally saw two near each other, and that Enclave looks pretty good...
|
|
http://blogs.edmunds.com/?14 /roadtests A plug for Edmunds long-term blog. They have a Veracruz, CX-9 & Acadia for there long-term blogs, so here's some more info from different drivers. From what I've read on the Veracruz, it seems good on the surface, but down deep it's still a hyundai. |
|
|
Replying to: zman3 (Jan 30, 2008 1:07 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: vad1819 (Jan 30, 2008 3:11 pm)
|
|
|
Replying to: albook (Jan 30, 2008 2:06 pm) now all they have to do is re-engineer it to get the weight out of it and come up a more efficient powerplant to take into account the new cafe regs. if they would have put it on a diet in the first place that would one less task on the list of things to do to stay competitive and conform to evolving regulations that they all seemed to think would never get here with all of their lobbying, whining and such. so call it hits on some fronts and falling squarely on their face in others. that's also not to say the others aren't faced with the same tasks ahead just to varying degrees. looking forward to the chicago auto show to finally sit in some to see what all the hype is about around here for all of them.
|
|
|
Replying to: vad1819 (Jan 30, 2008 3:11 pm) let's think about this I got to rent a few J body & geo gm cars here and there and you can't tell me they were much better than an elantra. does that have any bearing on the lambda's of today that you so admire, NO. not that I'm running out to buy one but they all have their strengths/weakness' and you simply can't apply that false logic to any of the CUV manufaturer's at this point in this day/age. escorts, glc's, corolla's, civics, j bodies, rabbits, they all blew to varying degree's. rust, poor fit, finish, lousy materials, the list can be made for each. try again Vad.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: freealfas (Jan 30, 2008 7:04 pm) Or not, that'd be ok too. An experience with a compact car from one company has nothing to do with that same company's new Crossover. The Saturn Ion is a piece of Crapola as far as I'm concerned, but it doesn't mean the Outlook will be.
|
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 GMC Acadia
2009 Mitsubishi Outlander
2010 Subaru Forester
2009 Hyundai Santa Fe
2009 Ford Taurus X
2011 Toyota RAV4
2010 Nissan Rogue
2010 Honda Accord Crosstour
2010 Dodge Journey
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
