- #5311 of 7126
-
Re: TX and over CUV's [vad1819]
by baggs32
-
Jan 27, 2008 (12:08 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: vad1819 (Jan 26, 2008 4:22 pm)
Then I sited in second row seat (bench, surprising for Eddie Bauer ed.), so my knees was against front seat. The second row seats couldn't be adjusted, another surprised for me. So TX has less space between front seat and second, even numbers saying different, then GM CUV's, CX-9, Highlander.
Being that the occupants of the second row of our vehicle are small children 99% of the time none of that matters to me and shouldn't to anyone in the same situation. Who buys one of these three row behemoths to make the occasional adult passengers comfortable? Does anyone sit adults in the second row of these things for long trips the majority of the time they are driving it? Wouldn't a smaller more efficient and better driving SUV/CUV be a better choice for them?
I've never understood the obsession with an inch or two of legroom. They do the same thing in the mid-size sedan thread and I don't get it there either.
The Flex looks same as a TX inside.
Either you weren't looking at the inside of a Flex, or you need your eyes checked immediately!
|
- #5312 of 7126
-
Re: Crossover Comparison continued [samf10]
by freealfas
-
Jan 27, 2008 (12:10 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: samf10 (Jan 27, 2008 11:31 am)
"Am i forgetting any good CUV in the 30-35k range"
taurus x actually...
|
- #5313 of 7126
-
Re: Crossover Comparison continued [samf10]
by biscuit_xls
-
Jan 27, 2008 (12:18 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: samf10 (Jan 27, 2008 11:31 am)
Outlander V6...4WD, paddle shifters, quick DVD based touch-screen Nav, DVD player, music hard drive, 6 speed, V6, 3rd row seating, load leveling HID headlights, 9 speaker 650W Rockford Fosgate stereo, 18" alloys, great brakes, Bluetooth, 20+ mpg mileage, 10 year warranty, leather interior, best handling in class, PZEV engine, flip down rear tailgate, fastkey keyless entry & ignition. MSRP is $33K and you can get it for just under $30K.
|
- #5314 of 7126
-
Re: Crossover Comparison continued [freealfas]
by samf10
-
Jan 27, 2008 (12:38 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: freealfas (Jan 27, 2008 12:10 pm)
Thanks for the input. I would actually look at the Outlander but too many consistent reviews mention drawbacks in comfort, utility, and mpg (for size) and price for what you get. In Edmunds inside line comparison test of compact SUV's it came in 4th behind the RAV-4, Rogue, CR-V. I am looking more towards a mid-size, and if I were to more compact it would be the RDX for a 2-3K more and much better. Same time I do like to check out these vehicles myself and not just based on reviews, but if there is a consistent consensus from multiple reviews on a car, tends to be true. Maybe i'll check it out though.
As far as the Taurus X, I have absolute zero faith in ford these days, and I'm not really into the Hearst look, no offense.
|
- #5315 of 7126
-
Re: Crossover Comparison continued [samf10]
by freealfas
-
Jan 27, 2008 (12:48 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: samf10 (Jan 27, 2008 12:38 pm)
I really like the "Hearst" look it makes it look much more expensive than it really is... LOL
as for faith in ford, I'd argue that gm has had more serious teething problems with the lambdas than ford ever had with the FS/T-reX... as for the rest, whatever... You asked, I offered without trying to be "offensive".
not sure why people feel compelled to insult than say well really I didn't mean anything by it, why say it in the first place?
moving on, good luck with whatever you buy for whatever reason you choose it.
|
- #5316 of 7126
-
Re: Crossover Comparison continued [freealfas]
by samf10
-
Jan 27, 2008 (1:25 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: freealfas (Jan 27, 2008 12:48 pm)
Its not an insult or a shot at you. I really do appreciate the suggestion and help on something i may overlooked. However when i look at the car that is the honest reaction i get. Felt compelled to say no offense b/c people can take their cars pretty personal. I do not think i am alone in thinking the ford X looks like a hearst. I personally would not buy it for that reason. Cars are subjective right, if everyone liked the same car that would be pretty boring and many companies would be out of business. Enjoy your Taurus X, i'll call you for arrangements for its use next time i know of a funeral.
|
- #5317 of 7126
-
Re: Crossover Comparison continued [samf10]
by tim156
-
Jan 27, 2008 (1:33 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: samf10 (Jan 27, 2008 11:31 am)
So, let me understand this. You test drove all those cars, even the 09 Murano? That's 12 vehicles, I'm impressed. I have an 07 Freestyle SEL with a BP gas cap and it doesn't affect the style, performance, ride, interior space or value one bit. I was at my Ford dealer a couple of weeks ago and there was a rack with plenty of Edge, Taurus X and every other vehicle brochure in the Ford and Lincoln line. Maybe the dealer you went to just forgot to order some and was too embarrassed to admit it. As for the Edge, some friends just bought an SEL and I think it's a pretty nice car. Not as roomy as my Freestyle, but plenty of room for 4 adults going out for dinner. They got a really good deal on a nicely loaded 07. It was pricey, but still less than most you list with the options they have. We didn't have a chance to really open it up but it seemed to accelerate just fine on to the freeway and the ride was smooth and quiet. I don't know, there just seems to be a lot of Ford haters out there. I like mine, and my friends are very pleased with their purchase. Good luck making your decision.
|
- #5318 of 7126
-
Re: Crossover Comparison continued [samf10]
by humblecoder
-
Jan 27, 2008 (2:05 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: samf10 (Jan 27, 2008 1:25 pm)
However when i look at the car that is the honest reaction i get. Felt compelled to say no offense b/c people can take their cars pretty personal. I do not think i am alone in thinking the ford X looks like a hearst.
After reading your post I went back and looked at some pictures of the TX, and now that you mention it, I do see some resemblance to a hearse! I never really thought about it before, until you brought it up.
Bear in mind that I will soon be the owner of a TX in a few weeks, and your observation certainly hasn't changed my opinion. On the contrary, it'll come in handy lugging around the mother-in-law!
|
- #5320 of 7126
-
Re: TX and other CUV's [baggs32]
by vad1819
-
Jan 27, 2008 (2:29 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: baggs32 (Jan 27, 2008 12:08 pm)
I don't argue about your opinion. It's good that you're liked. I just share my experience from auto show.
"Does anyone sit adults in the second row of these things for long trips the majority of the time they are driving it?"
Yes it does matter. When your kid will be hitting back of your seat. The TX no longer fuel saver with new engine in there. So, why not buy bigger more comfortable CUV.
About Flex: the interior looks same as TX. The second row moves same as TX, even seat same.The space behind third row looks same as TX. I have not measured with the tape.
The very good CUV is Volvo. A lot space almost same as Acadia, rear smaller bottom part of the gate drops down, I liked it very much. ( I'm taking back what I said before about Volvo).
But if you're willing to spent 45 grand or more for family CUV the Mercedes R-class will be one of the best choices. The interior is superior compare to any CUV, at same time conservative using high quality materials, even interior door handles feels like you're sitting in the sedan. There're no reasons to compare R-class to Q7, R has much, much better interior and space. Q7 is more like oversize Toureg.
|