You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Crossover SUV Comparison

7147 messages, Last post on Dec 05, 2009 at 5:13 PM
You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
|
You didn't mention the FreeStyle. It has great headroom Yeah, but legroom isn't that great. Here's my thing on Freestyle pricing. it will hit 35-36 grand loaded. But models do go for pretty low. That's becasue 27-30g is all ppl wanna pay for this vehichle. It lacks some of todays hot features, as well as styling, and power. interior quality inside isn't great. Ford's got more to do than just a little face lift, some more power, and a little interior upgrade to keep up with CX-9 cousin and Vera Cruz and Acadia. About keyless VeraCruz thing-Hyundai doesn't offer remote start like the outlook does. Looking at those photos, third row space in Vera Cruz doesn't look great. But I'll see in Chicago. Someone said that what you should define CUV by is that you can't put it in one category. but what I say is that it should be defined as a wanna be vehichle. A wanna be SUV that combines all the best qualities of an SUV, van, and sedan(sport-luxury). At least that's what the most capabe ones are. Then you see the Murano/ Edge. THey are great, but sporty 5door cars with ground clearance. I hope someone with find spyshots of 08 Pilot and Highlander(Is it true this will be in Chicago?). |
|
|
Replying to: music287 (Jan 30, 2007 6:12 am)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bobw3 (Jan 30, 2007 3:10 pm)
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: guyf (Jan 30, 2007 4:50 pm) |
|
|
Replying to: guyf (Jan 30, 2007 4:50 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: fordwrench (Jan 30, 2007 4:53 pm) last summer 5 people, cargo box on top, hitch mounted bike rack with 4 bicycles out back. stuff under all the seats, covering up the rear window, no room for feet in the second row, only one person could fit in the 3rd row. beverly hillbilly's at it's best. i'm just wondering if the freestyle is up to that kind of load?
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: baggs32 (Jan 30, 2007 2:19 pm) Actually, the Freestyle is only "based" on the XC90, since the XC90 uses boron steel in the roof and an aluminum subframe for the rear suspension, something the Freestyle uses regular steel for. |
|
|
|
|
All very good in this overall comparison. Freestyle still gets my vote, because its best in: 1. fuel economy 2. crash ratings 3. competitive nimble handling 4. CVT is the best tranny here -- optimal selection of drive ratios at all times. But the Freestyle lacks stability control (anti-skid intervention), so its a tough choice. Freestyle, and others in this group, are probably short of enough boron steel or aluminum structurally efficient parts, as Mitsubishi has managed to include in the Outlander's roof, for example, at a reasonable price.
|
|
|
Replying to: coldcranker (Jan 30, 2007 7:45 pm) 2. crash ratings It's the only one besides the Pilot to be tested yet so we don't know if it will remain true. 3. competitive nimble handling You haven't driven a CX-9 yet, have you? 4. CVT is the best tranny here It's also the cause for the low towing rating, many shops don't know how to fix it, and it has a peak torque rating of 258 ft. lbs. The Freestyle is a great entry in many ways especially fuel mileage, room, and actual purchase price, but unfortunately, it's looks, towing, and engine (bring on the 3.5L) are not up to par with other manufacturers. Ford needs to really push it in 2008 when atleast two of those are remedied.
|
|
|
Replying to: coldcranker (Jan 30, 2007 7:45 pm) |
|
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 GMC Acadia
2009 Hyundai Santa Fe
2009 Ford Taurus X
2011 Toyota RAV4
2010 Nissan Rogue
2010 Honda Accord Crosstour
2010 Dodge Journey



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats