Sign In Join 



Crossover SUV Comparison

7147 messages,  Last post on Dec 05, 2009 at 5:13 PM

You are in the SUVs Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? GMC Acadia, Hyundai Santa Fe, Ford Taurus X, Toyota RAV4, Nissan Rogue, Honda Accord Crosstour, Dodge Journey, Car Buying, Car Comparisons, SUV


Messages Page 2 of 715
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
715
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#11 of 7147
Re: Acadia size [albook] by arumage
Jan 25, 2007 (6:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: albook (Jan 25, 2007 5:35 pm)

But it doesn't have alot of torque. The smaller CX-9 only has 2 ft lbs less despite weighing 400 lbs less, and the much smaller Veracruz has atleast 6 ft lbs more. Horsepower is all well and good, torque turns the wheels. What the Freestyle lacks in some areas, it makes up in other... like price and fuel efficiency, especially for the space. Power to weight in the Veracruz is less than 16 lbs per hp, and the CX-9 is just over 16 lbs per hp. The Louisville Auto Show is this weekend. I should be able to check out the Outlook, Acadia, and Freestyle there. Since it's not a huge show, I doubt I'll get to see a CX-9 or Veracruz though.
#12 of 7147
Re: Acadia size [arumage] by coldcranker
Jan 25, 2007 (8:14 pm)
Reply

Replying to: arumage (Jan 25, 2007 6:35 pm)

C'mon people, the Freestyle looks good. It has rugged good looks that Jeep has used to gain market share. I like the flared wheelwells and all-business demeanor that says "no foo-foo stuff here, just a great Volvo-derived chassis and functional features". The Acada/Outlook has my vote, too. Very well engineered vehicles, if a bit porky.
#13 of 7147
Re: Compare the CX-9, Veracruz, Pilot, Acadia, Outlook, Enclave and Freestyle [kjf18] by bobw3
Jan 25, 2007 (8:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: kjf18 (Jan 25, 2007 8:35 am)

I noticed in your list of 8 requirements, quality/reliability was not one of them. Maybe that's why you choose GM
#14 of 7147
Re: Compare the CX-9, Veracruz, Pilot, Acadia, Outlook, Enclave and Freestyle [bobw3] by arumage
Jan 26, 2007 (4:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Jan 25, 2007 8:52 pm)

I'm not a huge GM fan because of my absolute horrible experience with a 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme. It was a total . Although the 1989 Oldsmobile 88 was a great car, except for the cheap plastic interior bits. That has to be my biggest problem with GM. I'm going to check out the Acadia this weekend. Hopefully, they will have improved in this department. All the Fords we've owned have been wonderful, especially our old 1988 Aerostar. That thing was only in the shop once in over 10 years for something non-maintenance related. I'm also had good luck with my 1999 Toyota Camry LE, although I think it is so unrefined when compared to my 2000 Dodge Intrepid ES (but more mechanically sound).
 
I'm not going to judge the Acadia or Outlook just because it's a GM. I think they are getting better everyday. I think they are less complacent than they were in the '90s.
#15 of 7147
Freestyle is DOA by hardhawk
Jan 26, 2007 (6:11 am)
Reply
I have read repeatedly that the Freestyle is being dropped by Ford due to lack of sales. It's too bad, because if they had put the larger engine that is going in the 2008 500 it would have probably sold much better.
#16 of 7147
Re: Acadia size [coldcranker] by nxs138
Jan 26, 2007 (6:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: coldcranker (Jan 25, 2007 8:14 pm)

The Freestyle is okay, but I don't like how bland the front end looks. Those headlights make it look "tired". A little more artful design with the headlights/grille would do wonders for this vehicle. As would a more sporty package.
#17 of 7147
Re: Freestyle is DOA [hardhawk] by arumage
Jan 26, 2007 (7:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: hardhawk (Jan 26, 2007 6:11 am)

It is being replaced with a new model very loosely based on the Fairlane concept.
#18 of 7147
Re: Compare the CX-9, Veracruz, Pilot, Acadia, Outlook, Enclave and Freestyle [bobw3] by kjf18
Jan 26, 2007 (10:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: bobw3 (Jan 25, 2007 8:52 pm)

Oops. Clearly, I didn't spend enough time on that post! I should have included quality/reliability; it definitely was a factor. And it's very hard to quantify with a first-year release.
 
Kelly
#19 of 7147
GMC Acadia versus Mazda CX-9 by tdiidman
Jan 26, 2007 (10:32 am)
Reply
The SLT2 version of the Acadia and the Grand Touring version of the CX-9 (both with NAV and rear entertainment)are the two vehicles I'm primarily looking at (may also look at the new 2008 Highlander when it arrives). I just saw my first CX-9 yesterday and have looked at the Acadia a couple of times in the past couple of weeks. From my perspective, advantages of the Acadia include the 2nd row Captain' chairs, a better powertrain warranty (100,000 miles versus 60,000 miles), and better fuel ecomony on AWD versions (rated 17/24 versus 16/22). Advantages of the Mazda include the preservation of a 6 disc in dash CD when the rear entertainment center is ordered since the DVD is located in the rear entertainment console (the Acadia has only a single disc in dash CD/DVD that has to be used for either the rear entertainment center viewing or listing to a CD), electroluminescent guages, bluetooth capability, amber rear turn signals (IMHO, but I don't know if this is backed by scientific data, these are easier to see than red ones due to the contrast with the red taillights-? fewer rear end collisions), the availability of rain sensing wipers (I love these on my VW Jetta), and the availability of a backup camera when navigation is ordered. As always, there is no one "perfect car" that meets everyone's needs. If only the Acadia had some of the aforementioned features that the Mazda has, it would be a no brainer decision for me- as it is now, it's a bit more difficult a decision. I'm hoping GM might make some of the modifications later in this model year or 2008 at the latest (I actually suggested this in an e-mail to them earlier today, but who knows if anyone other than customer service personnel will ever see it).
#20 of 7147
New Freestyle by albook
Jan 26, 2007 (10:55 am)
Reply
Saw the new front on Freestyle (googled it). Now it looks worse. Front worked in the 500 but not here-very stationwagon like. The old one lacked refinement. I think the only benefit was the gas mileage- which Acadia compares closely to. The acadia does handle well despite it's weight. very good acceleration. And great cabin space. It's the way to go coming from a minvan. I really want to see how Honda and Highlander will resond to it.

Messages Page 2 of 715
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
715
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement