181 messages,
Last post on Aug 22, 2012 at 9:11 PM
You are in the
Dodge Journey Forum.
What is this discussion about?
Dodge Journey, Concept Cars, Future Vehicle, SUV
#35 of 181 Re: 2009 Dodge Journey [qbrozen]
by albook
Feb 21, 2008 (12:30 pm)
allbook - i believe the frontrunner right now to replace the Pac is a volvo V70. Although its likely we'll go used. We also like the FX35, but my wife is a bit concerned about the lack of cargo space.
So I see you like the wagon esq. of the Pac (considering you want to replace it with a wagon). I love the FX- it looks great but it does have small cargo numbers.
I thing it's sad that Chrysler couldn't take the time to properly remodel this vehicle. It had slow sales so they just chopped it. It had so much potential.
#36 of 181 Re: 2009 Dodge Journey [albook]
by qbrozen
Feb 22, 2008 (10:27 am)
Interesting you should mention that because I was thinking about it the other day. Does anyone happen to have a link to the Pac's sales numbers these past few years?
I just see SO MANY on the road, it makes me wonder.
#37 of 181 Re: 2009 Dodge Journey [qbrozen]
by albook
Feb 22, 2008 (4:25 pm)
I just see SO MANY on the road, it makes me wonder.
With so many incentives, they must have been nailed to the show floor!
#38 of 181 Re: 2009 Dodge Journey [albook]
by qbrozen
Feb 25, 2008 (11:32 am)
or severely overproduced, which has historically been a common habit of 'mericun manufacturers.
#39 of 181 Re: 2009 Dodge Journey [riler]
by snapcracklepop
Feb 27, 2008 (10:02 am)
WE HAVE A 2006 PACIFICA. WE TEST DROVE THE JOURNEY AND AS U STATE THIS NOT GREAT GAS MILAGE FOR THE SIZE BUT BELIEVE ME THE SIX IS NOT UNDER POWERED IT WOULD EASILY LEAVE OUR PACIFICA IN THE DUST
Riler - How was the journey test drive? I like the looks of the Journey and the interior features look amazing - how was everything in person? It gets 19 mpg city and 25 mpg highway which is pretty good for a crossover with third row seating! I'm impressed with it.
#40 of 181 Re: 2009 Dodge Journey [snapcracklepop]
by qbrozen
Feb 27, 2008 (3:24 pm)
It gets 19 mpg city and 25 mpg highway which is pretty good for a crossover with third row seating!
But that's with the 173hp 4-cyl.
Not an engine I would personally want in a 3-row 2-ton vehicle. But to each his/her own.
#41 of 181 Re: 2009 Dodge Journey [qbrozen]
by albook
Mar 02, 2008 (7:44 pm)
But that's with the 173hp 4-cyl.
Not an engine I would personally want in a 3-row 2-ton vehicle. But to each his/her own.
They say the 3.5 V6 has plenty of power, but the numbers aren't impressive. I bet that might turn some off.
#42 of 181 Automobile
by qbrozen
Mar 05, 2008 (2:59 pm)
So i just read a 1.5 page writeup in Automobile. I have to say, their comments make me think I should go check one out. While they are disappointed in the interior space (2nd row too tight and 3rd row completely useless), they do say it is the quietest sub-$30k car they have every driven and has fit and finish that surpasses any other Chrysler built. Seems like pretty decent praise.
one thing i did note is that they said the 3rd row is optional. This is something I was wondering when 1 poster commented on a 3 row SUV with a 4-cyl. I was curious if the 3rd row could even be had with the 4-cyl, but I could not find the answer on Dodge's website.
#43 of 181 Re: Automobile [qbrozen]
by albook
Mar 05, 2008 (8:43 pm)
I'll say it's a decent offereing. It' s what Chrysler needs right not. And the third row, from my experience at the Chicago auto show is just as comfortable as a Pacifica's. You're right about the second row, though. Actually, it's like they took the outside of the PAC and shrunk it lot, but no the inside that much. It's worth checking out.
#44 of 181 Re: Automobile [albook]
by qbrozen
Mar 06, 2008 (10:49 am)
I'll have to see if they are exaggerating about that 3rd row, then. Cause if you say it is the same as the Pac, we find it very useful. My wife sits back there comfortably. I certainly wouldn't say, as they did in their writeup of the Journey, "it is only inhabitable if you are a quadruple amputee." (i may be botching that slightly, but that was pretty much the jist)