Sign In Join


Mitsubishi News

962 messages,  Last post on Jul 02, 2009 at 1:24 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Mitsubishi


Messages Page 78 of 97
1
...
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
...
97
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#765 of 962
oldfarmer... by iluvmysephia1
Feb 16, 2008 (3:44 pm)
Reply
hey, I'll pop in to my glovebox and look at the weight on my Lancer's registration later today. We're doing some yardwork so I'll check it out a tad later. Kind of interesting, though, I forget what the press has said my '08 Lancer GTS weighs.
 
That shouldn't be hard to find online with all of the reviews I've bookmarked on the '08 Lancer in my 'Favorites.' I'll check it out and get back on here to let you know.
 
I know that the day before yesterday we drove to Sierra Vista, AZ, and it was very windy on the freeway. The Lancer GTS held tight to the road and didn't even start to blow off track. A side attribute to weighing a bit more is steady tracking in blustery winds.
#766 of 962
OK, oldfarmer... by iluvmysephia1
Feb 17, 2008 (10:42 am)
Reply
I hopped in to my Lancer GTS and grabbed my vehicle registration and...it didn't have my Lancer's weight listed! Why not, I ask? You may ask, too.
 
I looked on the driver's door sill and I got what my Lancer's tire pressure is supposed to be: 32 p.s.i. Ok, kinda knew that already.
 
I looked in my Lancer's manual and they also don't list my '08 Lancer GTS' weight! They do, however list what the GVVR weigh is, and, when I subtract the maximum passenger weight from that weight I get 3,252 lbs.
 
I then went to all the online articles I've bookmarked and to some others I Googled. Here are some interesting weights from the reviewer's articles on the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS.
 
Car Connection says it's curb weight is 3,032 lbs. Autobytel and Edmunds say the Japanese compact's curb weight is 3,109 lbs. Road and Track says 2,999 lbs.! Motor Trend lists the curb weight as 3,032 lbs., which matches what Edmunds and Car Connection says. So, in conclusion, I can say my 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS weighs approximately 3, 085 lbs. That is computed by adding all the weights up and dividing by the number of sources sought and found.
 
What is perplexing is why my vehicle registration doesn't list the car's weight. Isn't that something you can count on, like death, taxes and an occasional Led Zeppelin reunion tour? Well, I'll find out soon because March 2008 is my license renewal month and hopefully the new paperwork will show the '08 Lancer GTS' weight.
 
From looking at these numbers it appears the press got conflicting numbers. But since my initial vehicle registration does not show my car's weight on it I can't make a complete comparison.
#767 of 962
Re: OK, oldfarmer... [iluvmysephia1] by oldfarmer50
Feb 17, 2008 (3:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (Feb 17, 2008 10:42 am)

"...it appears the press got conflicting numbers..."
 
I hate it when I let my obsessive nature drag other people into my nuttiness. I'm sorry I've got you running around looking up weights now too.
 
So you can sleep tonight I have a few figures for your Lancer from Edmunds.
GTS auto--3109 GTS manual--3032
DE auto 2999 DE manual--2922
 
It seems that there are differences in weight depending on trim and optional equipment. Seems Edmunds was using the GTS and Road and Track was talking about the DE.
 
I couldn't find a similar reason for my Eclipse numbers. Maybe the published figures are for a loaded up model with a sunroof and other gizmos mine doesn't have. I guess I'll just call Mitsu up and bug them. Then again, maybe I won't. I like the idea of my car weighing 150 pounds less. That'll make it FEEL faster.
#768 of 962
Re: Hey y'all... [iluvmysephia1] by toomanyfumes
Feb 17, 2008 (4:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (Feb 15, 2008 9:45 am)

Good link about Mitsu's past and previous models. They kind of glossed over the fact that the Mitsubishi Zero's were used to bomb Pearl Harbor and for Kamikaze missions.
#769 of 962
Re: Hey y'all... [toomanyfumes] by oldfarmer50
Feb 17, 2008 (4:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: toomanyfumes (Feb 17, 2008 4:12 pm)

"...Mitsubishi Zero..."
 
I was going to mention that especially since my dad served in the Pacific during WW II but then again General Motors factory in Germany made tanks for Hitler.
#770 of 962
That's all right oldfarmer... by iluvmysephia1
Feb 17, 2008 (6:30 pm)
Reply
now it'll get me looking at my vehicle registration in March to see if my Lancer GTS' vehicle weight is listed. Nuttin' wrong with that.
 
Perhaps I bought my Lancer GTS last March too early for the state of Arizona to have entered the car's weight in their computer system yet, dunno.
#771 of 962
Mitsu i MIEV by oldfarmer50
Feb 22, 2008 (9:57 am)
Reply
Just read the Edmunds article about Mitsu's new electric car. 0-60 in under 9 seconds. That's pretty fast for an electric car. Sounds like it might make a good urban commuter car. Especially if there are recharge plugs at work.
 
I'm thinking most people drive less than 25 miles to work, maybe drive out a short distance to lunch at noon and then drive less than 25 miles back home. Add in a few extra miles on the way home for shopping and you probably don't do more than 60 miles a day. With a practical range of 80 miles the i MIEV just might work.
 
Of course it might be a real winner if the US gov't gave a 50% tax credit like the Japanese.
#772 of 962
EVO triumphs by Mr_Shiftright HOST
Feb 22, 2008 (9:59 am)
Reply
New issue of Road & Track tests the new EVO against the Subaru STi on the race track. The EVO excelled in every category.
#773 of 962
Re: Mitsu i MIEV [oldfarmer50] by elgatoloco
Feb 22, 2008 (9:16 pm)
Reply

Replying to: oldfarmer50 (Feb 22, 2008 9:57 am)

I just finished that same review. I knew that Mitsu had been testing the Miev in real world conditions in Japan for the last 6 months or so and I personally believe that this car - and other "serious" electric cars in the same mold - will help not only their owners, but ALL automobile owners, save mucho dinero in about 2 -3 years. The price of oil is not really based totally on supply and demand anyway, but also by speculation on its prompt availability to consumer need. If by 2012 - 2013 or thereabouts there are maybe a few million electric cars in use worldwide that could still pose a serious threat to countries that rely solely on oil revenues. Just the mere fact that this new technology is viable might cause these countries to drop prices (or boost production) to try and slow the demand for cars like the Miev.
 
More supply + less demand =lower prices. Correct?
 
Personally I don't think that once the electric car is a proven product it will ever go away. It is simply to efficient and practical, especially in an urban environment, for people to completely return to all-fuel vehicles. I think most people will have one or two of each. I plan on getting a Miev ASAP when they become available in the U.S. I don't figure on using it to travel on vacations or haul pigs to market but it will be the get-grocery-pick-up-kids-see-movie-do-whatever vehicle. If the electric vehicle battery technology can improve even half as quickly as something like computer chip technology has done then the inner city is going to be seriously quiet in about ten years.
 
A decently priced, reliable all-electric vehicle combined with mass production capability and an existing dealership structure...
 
Can't wait.
#774 of 962
Re: Mitsu i MIEV [elgatoloco] by oldfarmer50
Feb 23, 2008 (5:30 am)
Reply

Replying to: elgatoloco (Feb 22, 2008 9:16 pm)

I've never been a big fan of all-electric vehicles for a number of reasons but you bring up an interesting point. Lessening demand on oil by using more electric cars whose power can be generated by non-oil sources. That's something to think about.
 
Where I live there are two companies working on what may be the replacement technology for the internal combustion engine; fuel cells. One company has fuel cell back-up electric generators (big) and the other is developing fuel cell batteries for computers and phones (small). The next step is to develop hydrogen fuel cell engines for cars. Honda has already started a program for this.
 
It would be nice to have cars you could run basicly on water and give the finger to the oil cartels.

Messages Page 78 of 97
1
...
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
...
97
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement