Sign In Join 



Mitsubishi News

1057 messages,  Last post on Nov 23, 2009 at 5:58 AM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Mitsubishi


Messages Page 77 of 106
1
...
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
...
106
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#760 of 1057
Re: Now that's a Mitsubishi... [mikevegas06] by oldfarmer50
Feb 10, 2008 (3:18 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mikevegas06 (Feb 10, 2008 8:05 am)

"...a whole 2 more horsepower under the hood..."
 
Good point. But at least that is an effort to change the car itself rather than just the look of the car. My problem with Mitsu's efforts is that the criticism of the Eclipse by enthusiasts has been very consistent, they fault the engine, the handling and the weight. I've never heard anyone bashing the looks.
#761 of 1057
Hummm... by iluvmysephia1
Feb 10, 2008 (3:24 pm)
Reply
tough crowd.
#762 of 1057
Re: Hummm... [iluvmysephia1] by oldfarmer50
Feb 11, 2008 (4:21 pm)
Reply

Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (Feb 10, 2008 3:24 pm)

"...tough crowd..."
 
Just tough love.
#763 of 1057
Hey y'all... by iluvmysephia1
Feb 15, 2008 (8:45 am)
Reply
I wanna share something with you's. Take a look at this Mitsubishi link. It tells a lot about the company we have given a bunch of our cash to. Notably their intense love for racing their vehicles and not only racing them, but winning the races. I like that racing heritage and the fact that they engineer in changes from things they learn on the racecourse. Check out the different decades and what has happened in each of them.
 
Note the original Mitsubishi motor car in production came out in 1917 and was based on a Fiat not a Ford, this being strange because of the Henry name designation Mitsubishi gave it. The write-up says that Mitsu learned from Italian Fiat because they were huge and out ahead of everyone else(in their humble opinions, of course)in the 1910-1920 time period. Humm, that was news to me but looking at the early Ford's and Oldsmobile's maybe that is truth. Check it out--I think you'll enjoy the read.
 
http://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/corporate/museum/e/index.html
#764 of 1057
Skinny Eclipse by oldfarmer50
Feb 16, 2008 (2:17 pm)
Reply
I noticed something strange when I looked at my Eclipse registration. It say the weight is 3381. All the media says the Eclipse GT weighs between 3472 and 3528 depending on which source you use. I can't figure where the extra weight went unless the reviewers were counting the weight of a full gas tank.
 
Iluv, do you see any difference in your Lancer's weight between published and actual figures? The only reason this is of interest to me is that the Eclipse has been bashed because of it's weight. I'd hate to think the auto press was making up numbers.
#765 of 1057
oldfarmer... by iluvmysephia1
Feb 16, 2008 (2:44 pm)
Reply
hey, I'll pop in to my glovebox and look at the weight on my Lancer's registration later today. We're doing some yardwork so I'll check it out a tad later. Kind of interesting, though, I forget what the press has said my '08 Lancer GTS weighs.
 
That shouldn't be hard to find online with all of the reviews I've bookmarked on the '08 Lancer in my 'Favorites.' I'll check it out and get back on here to let you know.
 
I know that the day before yesterday we drove to Sierra Vista, AZ, and it was very windy on the freeway. The Lancer GTS held tight to the road and didn't even start to blow off track. A side attribute to weighing a bit more is steady tracking in blustery winds.
#766 of 1057
OK, oldfarmer... by iluvmysephia1
Feb 17, 2008 (9:42 am)
Reply
I hopped in to my Lancer GTS and grabbed my vehicle registration and...it didn't have my Lancer's weight listed! Why not, I ask? You may ask, too.
 
I looked on the driver's door sill and I got what my Lancer's tire pressure is supposed to be: 32 p.s.i. Ok, kinda knew that already.
 
I looked in my Lancer's manual and they also don't list my '08 Lancer GTS' weight! They do, however list what the GVVR weigh is, and, when I subtract the maximum passenger weight from that weight I get 3,252 lbs.
 
I then went to all the online articles I've bookmarked and to some others I Googled. Here are some interesting weights from the reviewer's articles on the 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS.
 
Car Connection says it's curb weight is 3,032 lbs. Autobytel and Edmunds say the Japanese compact's curb weight is 3,109 lbs. Road and Track says 2,999 lbs.! Motor Trend lists the curb weight as 3,032 lbs., which matches what Edmunds and Car Connection says. So, in conclusion, I can say my 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS weighs approximately 3, 085 lbs. That is computed by adding all the weights up and dividing by the number of sources sought and found.
 
What is perplexing is why my vehicle registration doesn't list the car's weight. Isn't that something you can count on, like death, taxes and an occasional Led Zeppelin reunion tour? Well, I'll find out soon because March 2008 is my license renewal month and hopefully the new paperwork will show the '08 Lancer GTS' weight.
 
From looking at these numbers it appears the press got conflicting numbers. But since my initial vehicle registration does not show my car's weight on it I can't make a complete comparison.
#767 of 1057
Re: OK, oldfarmer... [iluvmysephia1] by oldfarmer50
Feb 17, 2008 (2:57 pm)
Reply

Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (Feb 17, 2008 9:42 am)

"...it appears the press got conflicting numbers..."
 
I hate it when I let my obsessive nature drag other people into my nuttiness. I'm sorry I've got you running around looking up weights now too.
 
So you can sleep tonight I have a few figures for your Lancer from Edmunds.
GTS auto--3109 GTS manual--3032
DE auto 2999 DE manual--2922
 
It seems that there are differences in weight depending on trim and optional equipment. Seems Edmunds was using the GTS and Road and Track was talking about the DE.
 
I couldn't find a similar reason for my Eclipse numbers. Maybe the published figures are for a loaded up model with a sunroof and other gizmos mine doesn't have. I guess I'll just call Mitsu up and bug them. Then again, maybe I won't. I like the idea of my car weighing 150 pounds less. That'll make it FEEL faster.
#768 of 1057
Re: Hey y'all... [iluvmysephia1] by toomanyfumes
Feb 17, 2008 (3:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: iluvmysephia1 (Feb 15, 2008 8:45 am)

Good link about Mitsu's past and previous models. They kind of glossed over the fact that the Mitsubishi Zero's were used to bomb Pearl Harbor and for Kamikaze missions.
#769 of 1057
Re: Hey y'all... [toomanyfumes] by oldfarmer50
Feb 17, 2008 (3:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: toomanyfumes (Feb 17, 2008 3:12 pm)

"...Mitsubishi Zero..."
 
I was going to mention that especially since my dad served in the Pacific during WW II but then again General Motors factory in Germany made tanks for Hitler.

Messages Page 77 of 106
1
...
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
...
106
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement