Article Comments 2007 Saturn Aura XR Follow-up Test

24 messages, Last post on May 25, 2009 at 5:41 AM

You are in the Saturn Aura Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Saturn Aura, Sedan

Article comments for Follow-Up Test: 2007 Saturn Aura XR - Here is the 2007 Saturn Aura XR in all its galvanized-steel glory. This is the top-of-the-line version of the Aura, a significant step up in comfort and ability from the base Aura XE, and the best vehicle to ever bear the Saturn name. (more)

Outline

Messages Page 2 of 3: 1; 2; 3; Prev; Next; Last

#5 of 24 I will take an Accord or Camry first by novell Jan 18, 2007 (4:10 pm)
When does the Oldsmobile version debut? Replies to this message: arumage (Jan 18, 2007 6:42 pm) alpha01 (Jan 19, 2007 8:27 am) arumage (Jan 19, 2007 10:02 am) and 2 more...
#6 of 24 Re: Article Comments 2007 Saturn Aura XR Follow-up Test [KarenS] by 1997montez34 Jan 18, 2007 (6:04 pm)
Replying to: KarenS (Jan 18, 2007 9:47 am) Does anyone proofread these articles before posting them? This Aura was a XR model, not a XE. This is clearly muddled by the author. Also his specs for the Accord's V6 are all wrong. It has 244hp and 211 torque, significantly LESS than the Aura XR.
#7 of 24 Re: I will take an Accord or Camry first [novell] by arumage Jan 18, 2007 (6:42 pm)
Replying to: novell (Jan 18, 2007 4:10 pm) I hope I'm not the only person who thinks the new Camry is truly ugly, and Toyota is not as much of a quality appliance as it used. That being said, I own a 1999 Camry LE 4-cyl. I much prefer the Saturn as far as looks... and price. I wonder how it wil hold up in the long run. The Accord Hybrid has 253hp and 232 ft. lbs. of torque. They probably should have mentioned what model they were comparing. Replies to this message: alpha01 (Jan 19, 2007 8:27 am) arumage (Jan 19, 2007 10:02 am) pat (Jan 19, 2007 10:04 am) and 1 more...
#8 of 24 Re: I will take an Accord or Camry first [arumage] by alpha01 Jan 19, 2007 (8:27 am)
Replying to: arumage (Jan 18, 2007 6:42 pm) I think styling is a moot debate, but I find the Camry very attractive, especially the rear with its Lexus GS-esque sculpting. I would agree that that Toyota has seen the dilemma of rapid growth - fallen quality. Thankfully, the initial issues with the Camry have been worked out, and really the remaining item is materials choice and fit and finish, which is inconsistent between models, at best. Want to check out a car that will surprise you? The new Altima is really sharp, very room, and quite powerful. However, I was SHOCKED to see literally DOZENS of new Altimas at the Budget rental lot when I was in Detroit for the Auto Show on the 11th. One question for you, arumage, what do you mean you prefer the Aura's price? To which Camry? I wish that edmunds.com would implement a better editing/proofing process - the trim line inaccuracies here made the article confusing as heck. And, apples should be compared to apples; I don't know if the author meant to cite the HAH horsepower figures, or the Accord V6, but it should have been the V6. ~alpha Replies to this message: arumage (Jan 19, 2007 10:02 am) pat (Jan 19, 2007 10:04 am) arumage (Jan 19, 2007 10:55 am)
#9 of 24 Feedback by pat HOST Jan 19, 2007 (8:53 am)
Feedback is always welcomed - click on the Help link on the right at the very bottom of the page and then the Contact Us tab at the top. You'll see what to do from there.
#10 of 24 Re: I will take an Accord or Camry first [alpha01] by arumage Jan 19, 2007 (10:02 am)
Replying to: alpha01 (Jan 19, 2007 8:27 am) An Aura with leather and traction control w/ 6-disc changer is $27k vs. $29k for the Camry. Even the outdated and less powerful Accord is $400 more with the same options. They were probably 4-cyl Altimas. The only problem I see with the new Altima is the recommendation for premium gas. Replies to this message: pat (Jan 19, 2007 10:04 am) arumage (Jan 19, 2007 10:55 am)
#11 of 24 Re: I will take an Accord or Camry first [arumage] by pat HOST Jan 19, 2007 (10:04 am)
Replying to: arumage (Jan 19, 2007 10:02 am) What did you think of the review that's the subject of this discussion? It's linked at the top of the page in case you missed it. Replies to this message: arumage (Jan 19, 2007 10:55 am)
#12 of 24 Re: I will take an Accord or Camry first [pat] by arumage Jan 19, 2007 (10:55 am)
Replying to: pat (Jan 19, 2007 10:04 am) I did notice the mistakes the others pointed out, but overall I found it very informative. It was definitely enough to peak my interest.
#13 of 24 Re: I will take an Accord or Camry (SE) first! by hondacura4 Jan 20, 2007 (6:53 am)
Oudated Accord? The Accord is still one of the top sellers/benchmark in this segment and one of the best overall performers. The 3.0 V6 is a gem and its refined and powerful even compared to the 3.5 and larger engines offered by other companies. Match the 3.0 liter V6 with the optional 6 speed MT and it only gets better. This car really moves. The Aura looks to be a great car but its going to have to prove itself to be a top car in this segment as the Accord and Camry have over the last 20 years. Replies to this message: arumage (Jan 20, 2007 7:24 am) pat (Jan 21, 2007 9:44 am) flash11 (Feb 28, 2007 7:18 pm)
#14 of 24 Re: I will take an Accord or Camry (SE) first! [hondacura4] by arumage Jan 20, 2007 (7:24 am)
Replying to: hondacura4 (Jan 20, 2007 6:53 am) The Accord has nearly 30 ft. lbs of torque less than the camry and 40 less than the Aura. For those who love the manual it's great, but the automatic puts the accord over 6 tenths behind to 60. That a big difference. That makes it nearly 10% slower than the Camry. It has proven itself in the past to be a great car, but it's no longer a class leader. Perhaps Honda will move up to its 3.5L V6. Replies to this message: pat (Jan 21, 2007 9:44 am)