0-60 is so yesterday!

Replying to: cobraboy1 (Jan 30, 2007 1:49 pm)

Replies to this message:
• cobraboy1 (Jan 30, 2007 2:23 pm)
• rorr (Jan 30, 2007 2:32 pm)
  • wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 2:54 pm)
    • cobraboy1 (Jan 30, 2007 3:05 pm) and 1 more...
    • rorr (Jan 30, 2007 3:07 pm) and 1 more...

Replying to: andres3 (Jan 30, 2007 1:26 pm)

"An unfair comparison between the Honda V6 and Audi 2.0T in 0-60 and 5-60 is what you provided. How about you provide the automatic Accord's numbers vs. the Automatic DSG Audi?"
 
Screw automatic drivers. If a sport coupe or sport sedan comes with a stick, that's what any warm blooded enthusiast should buy. And that's what should be road tested.
 
It's particularly lame when C&D, R&T or Motor Trend does a comparison between cars like a Lexus GS430 and BMW 550i and then saddles the BMW with a slushbox to "make it fair", since the Lexus doesn't come with a manual. Fair to who? The lazy non-enthusiast slushbox driver that doesn't probably even read the darn magazine anyway?
 
Sorry, I'm in a bad mood this afternoon. But if you read between my poor temperment above, I think the message is still valid.
 
P.S. Audi's DSG is not really a "slushbox" automatic with a torque converter. It may not be my preferred three pedal manual, but it deserves respect. If that's what most enthusiast Audi buyers go for, then perhaps it should also be tested. But not against a Honda slushbox. I own a 2004 TL 6-speed and am pretty sure that there are at least as many Accords sold with 6-speeds. And a self proclaimed "driving enthusiast" that goes for a slushbox better get their Prozac prescription refilled.

Replies to this message:
• andres3 (Jan 30, 2007 2:24 pm)

Replying to: wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 2:11 pm)

Replying to: habitat1 (Jan 30, 2007 2:11 pm)

Replying to: andres3 (Jan 30, 2007 1:26 pm)

Replying to: wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 2:11 pm)

"Seems to me a lot of the examples in here point up just how little we really glean from 0-60."
 
Well, I used to live and breath 0-60 back when I was (much) younger; but I'm beginning to think that IF some sort of standing start metric is desireable for benchmarking (benchracing) that a 5-60 test makes more sense. Simply from the standpoint that the results are probably more repeatable (since they aren't as dependent on clutch engagement practice, brake torquing practice, tire hookup, etc. etc.).
 
"I definitely think of all qualifications any car may have, straight line acceleration is a highly over-rated focus..."
 
Yep. But it provides such good fodder for internet debate....
 
BTW - I'm fairly sure that Bluetooth is AT LEAST available on the CX-9 (and may be standard on certain trims). Did you guys look at the MDX or did she just write off Acura out of hand? Too bad Lexus stopped making the wagon version of the IS......

Replies to this message:
• wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 2:54 pm)
  • cobraboy1 (Jan 30, 2007 3:05 pm)
    • wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 3:16 pm)
  • rorr (Jan 30, 2007 3:07 pm)
    • wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 3:22 pm)

Replying to: rorr (Jan 30, 2007 2:32 pm)

"BTW - I'm fairly sure that Bluetooth is AT LEAST available on the CX-9 (and may be standard on certain trims). Did you guys look at the MDX or did she just write off Acura out of hand? Too bad Lexus stopped making the wagon version of the IS......"
 
She wouldn't even set foot on the Acura lot. Go figger.
 
I don't care for the whole class in the first place, but the MDX certainly gets good press. I don't think it's much to look at though, just personally (highly subjective of course). The Mazda floats my boat much more before I even sit in it.
 
The less said about Lexus and their soft-padded, porcine ways, the better, good brother Roach...

Replies to this message:
• cobraboy1 (Jan 30, 2007 3:05 pm)
  • wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 3:16 pm)
• rorr (Jan 30, 2007 3:07 pm)
  • wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 3:22 pm)

Replying to: wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 2:54 pm)

Replies to this message:
• wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 3:16 pm)

Replying to: wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 2:54 pm)

Replies to this message:
• wale_bate1 (Jan 30, 2007 3:22 pm)

Replying to: cobraboy1 (Jan 30, 2007 3:05 pm)