You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-7
Acura RDX vs Mazda CX-7

216 messages, Last post on Aug 10, 2009 at 11:24 AM
You are in the Mazda CX-7 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester
| What do people think of one car vs the other. I personally think the Mazda looks better from the outside, but Acura has a better interior. Overall though, is the RDX worth the extra premium, especially when comparing the RDX w/o Technology Package and CX-7 GT AWD? | |
|
|
|
Replying to: roma007 (Nov 10, 2006 1:51 pm) Drive them both and whatever makes you happy, go with it. They are both fine cars. If marginally better leather and free WI-FI at the service department float your boat, stick with Acura. If you have only $30,000 and aren't going to race sports cars on mountain roads, go with the Mazda.
|
|
|
Replying to: carlitos92 (Nov 10, 2006 8:12 pm) The RDX is the winner for me. Now if I could get them to move the line on pricing, since they refuse to budge off MSRP.
|
|
|
Replying to: roma007 (Nov 11, 2006 2:46 pm)
|
|
|
Through October: CX-7: 15,250 RDX: 4,766
|
|
|
Replying to: aviboy97 (Nov 22, 2006 8:43 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: robertsmx (Nov 22, 2006 9:40 am) |
|
|
Replying to: robertsmx (Nov 22, 2006 9:40 am) I, personally, think the CR-V got beat with the ugly stick, did little to improve upon the previous gen, however, this is the wrong thread to be discussing that. |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: robertsmx (Nov 11, 2006 3:28 pm) |
|
|
I went to the dealer to buy an RDX. (Thank god i didnt) They wouldnt budge 1 penny off the MSRP. Now I kno the price has come down, closer to the low 30's. But in comparison, A CX-7 GT at sticker of 30,800 w/bose is had at 28,500. i discovered the CX-7 after my romp thru my "high class high price" acura dealer. I was dumbfounded as to why the Acura at the time was almost 35k and my GT i could buy at invoice of 28,5 w/bose & roof. It didnt make sense to me then, and it doesnt now. MAzda NAILED this market niche. Honda, Toyota, Acura, all missed the boat big time on this emerging type of vehicle. the RDX just reminded me of a mini overpriced ute like the X3. Acura pushed out the RDX with failed MPG ratings, over the top sticker, and blander than all hell styling. not worth my 34k. BMW X3, forget it at that price. If you like run of the mill Honda boringness (which is nice in an accord) not nice when ur spending 33k, the RDX has it. I felt no personality with the car, no statement. The only thing i liked was the unsilenced turbo and the turbo gauge. However, I would def say that the blower of the turbo would aggrevate me over time. The CX-7, in my opinion, blew open this part of the market with a quality vehicle, with power, the right amenities for buyers in this niche (who cares about seat memory, if you buy the car you will probably be the only one driving 90% of the time!). For the price you cannot beat the MAzda, the GT is a STEAL! Nothing comes close to the CX-7 besides the Murano (which is a good car) but still a little more expensive, bigger, and not as good handling. Owning Honda since i was 16 - driving the CX7 from Mile 1 made me realize that their suspension & breaking and driving mechanics just blew the tires off my then 2004 2dr Accord V6. The 7 is an exceptional value anyway you slice it - yes they could have at least put handles on the back doors, but if you value handles on doors more than you do driving - then you are looking at the wrong car! This car just has a get in it and go feel, which is great, and i havent felt that way about a car. its a winner, listen to the people who take the time to type out their reviews, test drive every other truck then test drive the mazda. dont be afraid to get into it on the test drive, and you will see what all the fuss is about. it will make u smile haha |
|
You are here:
Forums
SUVs
Mazda CX-7
Acura RDX vs Mazda CX-7
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Acura RDX
2010 Mazda CX-7



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic