Sign In Join 



Nissan Murano vs Toyota Highlander vs Subaru B9 Tribeca vs Honda Pilot

798 messages,  Last post on Dec 01, 2009 at 9:52 AM

You are in the Honda Pilot Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Nissan Murano, Toyota Highlander, Subaru B9 Tribeca, Honda Pilot, Acura MDX, Volkswagen Touareg, SUV


Messages Page 78 of 80
1
...
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#768 of 798
Re: 08 Highlander vs 09 Murano vs 08 Pilot [carchatnj] by ateixeira
Feb 05, 2008 (10:37 am)
Reply

Replying to: carchatnj (Feb 05, 2008 9:06 am)

Since you seem to be just getting started, my suggestion would be to go to the Philadelphia auto show, which starts this week.
 
There you can sample them all back to back, without any pressure from salesmen.
 
Test fit each one, see how seat comfort is, check out cargo room, visibility, etc. Take your time doing so.
 
Narrow it down to your top few choices, then test drive those.
 
Sample the Tribeca and the Veracruz while you're at it, both have nice interiors.
#769 of 798
Re: 5 Criteria for AWD (not 4WD, but AWD) [chelentano] by ateixeira
Feb 05, 2008 (12:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chelentano (Jan 16, 2008 8:13 pm)

Pardon my long delay in finding a source, but I finally found the video that shows that the VDC AWD system used by Subaru can send enough power to any single wheel to keep it moving up a ramp in simulated no-traction scenarios:
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t09ExAUgtyE&feature=related
 
Pretty amazing at any price point, even more so at Subaru's prices.
#770 of 798
Re: 5 Criteria for AWD (not 4WD, but AWD) [ateixeira] by jeffmc
Feb 05, 2008 (2:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Feb 05, 2008 12:01 pm)

Nice find, juice. Chelentano won't accept it, though, since it's not from a neutral source. Consumer Reports should set up this test to evaluate manufacturers' claims and systems... it's not a complicated or cost-prohibitive experiment.
#771 of 798
Re: 5 Criteria for AWD (not 4WD, but AWD) [jeffmc] by morey000
Feb 05, 2008 (10:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jeffmc (Feb 05, 2008 2:42 pm)

There are better off road vehicles out there than a tribeca, but not among the CUV class. I wouldn't put my 'Beca up against an FJ Cruiser, H3 or even a Jeep Grand Cherokee. But, I've gone up some 4WD roads with it and have been very very impressed with the Tribeca's capabilities-even with the mediocre stock tires.
 
If better off road traction is what you're looking for, the Subie's certainly have an advantage.
#772 of 798
Re: 5 Criteria for AWD (not 4WD, but AWD) [jeffmc] by ateixeira
Feb 06, 2008 (6:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: jeffmc (Feb 05, 2008 2:42 pm)

Well, if you watch it, ignore the marketing schpeal they dole out. I don't even necessarily agree with the reasons they some fail and some succeed (symmetry? huh?).
 
And they could have rigged the test for the competitors to fail. For example: that performed like a FWD CR-V, LOL.
 
But...what it does prove is that even a basic Forester X, priced under $20 grand, has a good enough AWD system to distribute enough power between front and rear axles to pass the front-to-rear test.
 
The VDC system goes a step further and can send enough power side-to-side, to any given wheel.
 
They can't rig that test. VDC makes it up, clear as day.
 
So rather than wait for a rebuttle, instead I'll challenge Mitsubishi fans to show me an Outlander (or Endeavor) that can make it up one of those ramps. The proof is in the pudding.
 
Remember, despite all the acronyms, C&D rated it in last place among compact crossovers in the off road portion of the test. So simple challenge - prove them wrong.
#773 of 798
Re: 5 Criteria for AWD (not 4WD, but AWD) [ateixeira] by chelentano
Feb 09, 2008 (1:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: ateixeira (Feb 05, 2008 12:01 pm)

Still you did not show any evidence to support your claim that Subaru AWD system would be capable of "100% power transfer to either axle".
 
You post another Subaru marketing video and you call it a "proof"? I can’t even see if that CR-V has rear wheels spinning: it could be very well a 2WD version of CR-V. There are so many other ways to stage that “test”. Not just me, but a lot of people on Youtube doubt the authenticity of that video. The last party I would trust is a car salesman.
 
But if you like marketing videos, I have got some.
 
Lancer AWD vs. Lamborghini AWD:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWQDWXviuFM
 
Mitsubishi Pajero AWD:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkMjhzv_zzE
 
Two Outlander videos in snow. If you ever driven a car in a heavy snow, you could tell that this Outlander AWD performance is impressive:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3arUMr2PsI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJt0j38JJBA&feature=related
#774 of 798
Re: 5 Criteria for AWD (not 4WD, but AWD) [chelentano] by morey000
Feb 09, 2008 (12:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: chelentano (Feb 09, 2008 1:09 am)

Chelentano,
Sure- marketing videos may be biased to favor their brand. But I don't buy your accusation that the whole thing was rigged. (by using a 2WD CRV)
 
I've taken my Tribeca on some reasonably hairy 4WD roads and have been quite impressed.
 
If that video isn't significant evidence that Subaru's symmetrical AWD VTD system doesn't transfer 100% of its power to a single wheel- I don't know what is. But, regardless, the Tribeca is pretty dang good off road. Just ask anyone who's ever take one there.
#775 of 798
Re: 5 Criteria for AWD (not 4WD, but AWD) [morey000] by chelentano
Feb 09, 2008 (7:34 pm)
Reply

Replying to: morey000 (Feb 09, 2008 12:26 pm)

>> Sure- marketing videos may be biased to favor their brand.
 
Yea, marketing is biased by nature.
.
 
>> I've taken my Tribeca on some reasonably hairy 4WD roads and have been quite impressed.
 
You should make a video then. I'd love to see in in heavy snow.
.
 
>> If that video isn't significant evidence that Subaru's symmetrical AWD VTD system doesn't transfer 100% of its power to a single wheel- I don't know what is.
 
Yea, I also don't know what is evidence. Nothing really. There is no Subaru offroad rally wins, no independent tests to prove that. Even the official Subaru site does not state that it can transfer 100% of its power to a single wheel. So far it's more like wishfull thinking.
.
 
>> But, regardless, the Tribeca is pretty dang good off road. Just ask anyone who's ever take one there.
 
It may be good, why not. But it does not appear to be the best
#776 of 798
Re: 08 Highlander vs 09 Murano vs 08 Pilot [carchatnj] by nmsg
Feb 09, 2008 (8:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: carchatnj (Feb 05, 2008 9:06 am)

carchatnj,
What major blind spots do you see in the 09 Murano? I was interested in the Murano and trying to find out what other people have to say about it. thx.
#777 of 798
Re: 08 Highlander vs 09 Murano vs 08 Pilot [nmsg] by carchatnj
Feb 11, 2008 (10:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: nmsg (Feb 09, 2008 8:46 pm)

I haven't had an opportunity to test drive the new Murano, but I know the 08 and older models have major blind spots out the back...I believe because the window is so small and curved.

Messages Page 78 of 80
1
...
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement