Sign In Join 



2007 Toyota Camry Transmission Questions

851 messages,  Last post on Nov 01, 2009 at 2:21 PM

You are in the Toyota Camry Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Camry, Transmission, Sedan


Messages Page 84 of 85
1
...
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#831 of 851
Re: 2007 camry 4cylinder trans [sunilv] by wwest
Aug 25, 2008 (7:56 am)
Reply

Replying to: sunilv (Aug 13, 2008 10:43 am)

Your transaxle is of a relatively new design, circa about 1998, that is capable of "real-time" reduction/control of the ATF line pressure, and thereby increasing FE not insubstantially. I have no doubt that you could provide a circuit to constantly "push" more electrical current into the PWM solenoid controlling the line pressure but absent the engine/transaxle ECU "knowing" the line pressure always remains adequate to support a gearshift and/or fully and firmly engage clutches under high drive torque stress the modification would be of little help.
 
And absent being of a reasonable level of help it would be needless to have to add the extra ATF cooling capacity the modification would undoubtedly require.
 
Apparently that's what was done with the '01 to '03 RX300's and even with the extra ATF cooling capacity provided by the towing package it still resulted in overheated ATF indications in as little as 40,000 miles.
#832 of 851
RE: TSB by leinie
Aug 29, 2008 (1:08 pm)
Reply
I had the TSB done today...I can't say I noticed a LOT of difference in the way the car behaves. Is it really true that the car needs to "learn" the way I drive, and it will adjust and probably be better after that?
#833 of 851
RE: TSB by leinie
Aug 30, 2008 (8:59 am)
Reply
Also, what are the chances the problems will come back?
#834 of 851
RE: TSB [leinie] by mcdawgg
Aug 30, 2008 (3:12 pm)
Reply

Replying to: leinie (Aug 30, 2008 8:59 am)

The problem won't come back, it is a program change, it can't just put in the old program! The TSB has been out for 4+ months, and everyone has been VERY happy since - enjoy your car!
#835 of 851
RE: TSB [leinie] by wwest
Aug 30, 2008 (3:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: leinie (Aug 30, 2008 8:59 am)

Entirely possible...
#836 of 851
RE: TSB by leinie
Aug 31, 2008 (11:08 am)
Reply
Is the dealer "required" to place the sticker under the hood stating that the update has been done? I have the work order stating that it was done, but there is no sticker under the hood...I know I don't have a reason to doubt that it was actually done, but as stated earlier, I didn't notice any immediate change in the acceleration/deceleration, so I'm hoping this is just because the car is still adjusting to my personal driving habits...
#837 of 851
RE: TSB [leinie] by mcdawgg
Aug 31, 2008 (5:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: leinie (Aug 31, 2008 11:08 am)

According to the TSB, the dealer is supposed to put the sticker under the hood - mine did, it states "Authorized Modifications" and lists the new program #. I noticed an immediate change, as did most others on another Toyota only site. Also, on this other site, the change is permanent, no reports of going back to the old program, which I wouldn't ever expect anyway.
#838 of 851
TRANSMISSION QUESTION! by djm2
Nov 24, 2008 (3:57 am)
Reply
Hi All:
    QUESTION: ---- Are there any owners out there in "Toyota Land," who have a V6 Camry with the "famous" and "infamous" 3 to 4 shift flare problem, that have NOT applied the TSB fix to the transmission, and have experienced a total transmisssion failure as the vehicle accumulated miles?
    I am sure that there are many V6 Camry vehicles out on the road that have the problem, but for some reason, the owners do not notice the issue. With that in mind, I was wondering if the issue with the "3 to 4 shift flare problem" does eventually cause a total transmission failure, at a higher mileage as the vehicle get older?
    Best regards! -------------- Dwayne
#839 of 851
Re: TRANSMISSION QUESTION! [djm2] by wwest
Nov 24, 2008 (9:04 am)
Reply

Replying to: djm2 (Nov 24, 2008 3:57 am)

If the "flare" is the result of a poorly engaged clutch or clutches, say as a result of low ATF pump pressure(***), then premature failure of the/those clutches would be the expected result.
 
On the other hand if the problem should prove to be simple idiocy, say leaving the transaxle in "neutral" for a brief period, on the part of the firmware programmers then I would expect no premature failures.
 
*** To improve FE the ATF pump pressure regulation is now under constant, "real time", control of the engine/transaxle ECU firmware via the use of a PWM electric solenoid. The lower the engine torque is at a given moment the lower the ATF need be to hold clutches from slipping. An upshift from 3rd to 4th would clearly imply/allow a LOW ATF pressure.
#840 of 851
Re: TRANSMISSION QUESTION! [wwest] by djm2
Nov 25, 2008 (4:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: wwest (Nov 24, 2008 9:04 am)

Good Morning WWEST:
 
      QUESTION: ---- If the driver of the vehicle with the problem was to shift the transmission manually from 1 to 4, would they experience the 3 to 4 "flare" either shifting up or shifting down, (3 to 4 / 4 to 3)? ------- If no "flare" is experienced in manual mode, I would think there are a few possibilities for this occurrence! ---- 1.) In the manual mode, there is another holding device coming on in each gear that is not normally "on" in the automatic drive selection mode. ---- or ---- 2.) There is a higher apply pressure to the holding components, thus no "flare" ---- or ---- 3.) There is no "scheduling valve participation" in the shifting process between gears, since the shifting is being determined by the driver. ---- If I had to guess, I think that the transmission is going into a "neutral" for a split second, (that is no holding device "on" in the gear sets)! ----- Reason, ---- if a vehicle had a pressure problem and it had 40,000 + miles, there would be postings on this site about major transmission failures, since the vehicle in question is a 2007 model. In the absence of these postings, I believe there is a scheduling problem on the 4 to 3 downshift and the 3 to 4 upshift when navigating slowly on the city streets. (The throttle opening and the speed of the vehicle does not send a sensitive enough message to the computer to select an appropriate gear, thus the computer gives the vehicle a "neutral"!) I would bet that a driver could force a smooth / positive up-shift on the automatic side of the selector, by accelerating hard, and as the vehicle is picking up speed, slowly backing off on the throttle, (thus decreasing throttle pressure), and allowing governor pressure to force a up-shift! ---------- What do you think?
 
     Best regards! ------------ Dwayne

Messages Page 84 of 85
1
...
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement