Sign In Join 



2007 Toyota Camry Transmission Questions

851 messages,  Last post on Nov 01, 2009 at 2:21 PM

You are in the Toyota Camry Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens

What is this discussion about? Toyota Camry, Transmission, Sedan


Messages Page 49 of 86
1
...
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
...
86
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#476 of 851
Re: Have been following this review & would like to comment [bohica223] by camryowner1
Aug 25, 2007 (5:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: bohica223 (Aug 24, 2007 7:11 pm)

Count me in. Where do I send service reports? I own 07 Camry LE 4cyl/5spd automatic, and have an arbitration hearing date on 9/13, but get this: It is being held at the local Toyota dealer's location. How unbiased do you think the outcome might be? As you will see re service reports, Toyota dealer says nothing wrong, so hearing will be my word against his. Fat chance of favorable rulling I am thinking.
#477 of 851
More O7 Camry Transmission Problems Posted "Toyota Camry Problems and R by camryowner1
Aug 25, 2007 (6:05 am)
Reply
There are even more problems with the 07 Camry transmission posted under "Toyota Camry Problems and Repairs" this website.
#478 of 851
Re: Have been following this review & would like to comment [camryowner1] by bohica223
Aug 25, 2007 (6:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: camryowner1 (Aug 25, 2007 5:55 am)

Yup, thats where they hold their arbitration meetings..wherever you bought the car. I will say however that the arbitrator does not work for Toyota and is an independent party. If your meeting goes like mine there will be a lot of people at the meeting. You, the head of the dealers service dept. a head mechanic, and a representative from Toyota. At my meeting the rep from Toyota didnt have much to say..just observed, however she was the one who told me that any and all letters of complaint posted in hear were just hearsay and were not valid. The head of my dealers service dept tried to offer me a deal to stop arbitration..Toyotas deal?? To pay for my extended warranty - $1,200.00 - and to try and fix the tranny probs..with no guaranteee that what they try would fix the problem...they also ignored all of the other problems I'm having with the car and said it was operating normally. I brought video evidence of the problems to the meeting but they were not interested in viewing the evidence...I mentioned the video to them at least 3 times and no interest. I also brough a tape recorder to record the meeting and wasnt allowed to do so. If you try to tape it you have to get permission from them before the meeting begins....try to get them to allow you to tape it and see what happens. If you would like to send me copies of your service reports you can contact me at camryflarehotmail.com and I'll give you an address to send them to. If we all come together sooner or later Toyota will HAVE to address these problems.
#479 of 851
Re: Have been following this review & would like to comment [bohica223] by wwest
Aug 25, 2007 (7:16 am)
Reply

Replying to: bohica223 (Aug 25, 2007 6:41 am)

If you really do want to gather a substantial level of evidence of this type then you might want to post your request on the Avalon, ES300, Sienna, Highlander, RX300, etc, threads as at one time or another I have seen this type of complaint, 1-2 second engine/transaxle downshift delay/hesitation, on all of those too.
 
While you're at it you might as well solicit service records of this same type from VW, Ford, Honda, etc, or even all marques that have FWD vehicles with automatic transaxles in their fleet.
 
That way your arbitration meeting can adjourn, will be adjourned, almost before it starts since you will have proven that your car is NOT "unique" in "this" sense and therefore NOT a lemon! Your car cannot be proven to be uniquely a lemon if the problem you are experiencing is fleetwide, or in this case industry wide.
#480 of 851
Re: Have been following this review & would like to comment [bohica223] by camryowner1
Aug 25, 2007 (7:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: bohica223 (Aug 25, 2007 6:41 am)

Will contact you at: camryflarehotmail.com
#481 of 851
Re: Have been following this review & would like to comment [wwest] by user777
Aug 25, 2007 (9:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: wwest (Aug 25, 2007 7:16 am)

bohica,
wwest is right when he suggests you visit the other forums. other toyota models with DBW have had people complaining about them.
 
for a clearer picture, visit the NHTSA website. I don't think you'll find the complaint level consistent across makes. people owning toyota / lexus branded vehicles have been dealing with issues like this for some time.
 
arbitration... i think the arbiters are paid by toyota. i think you signed certain privs away when you bought the vehicle.
 
good luck.
#482 of 851
Re: Have been following this review & would like to comment [wwest] by bohica223
Aug 25, 2007 (8:52 pm)
Reply

Replying to: wwest (Aug 25, 2007 7:16 am)

Time will tell wwest. I dont know about you but I've never seen this many complaints about an issue with any of the other cars you mentioned. Sure each and every manufacturer has some bugs in their cars..but nowhere near as many as this car. And straight from Toyotas mouth "This transmission is so new and so unique, there is no other like it." "The flare is a characteristic of this transmission" If it IS a characteristic of the transmission..why then doesnt it do it on ALL 07 Camrys? Why doesnt it do it ALL of the time? Sounds like smoke is getting blown up somewhere. I am willing to take my chances with the NJ lemon law, news investigations and the publishing of these problems with the Camry. And from the responses I've gotten it appears that many more are as well. Time will tell wwest, time will tell. We've got nothing to lose except poorly running cars...Toyota on the other hand....
#483 of 851
Re: Have been following this review & would like to comment [bohica223] by wwest
Aug 26, 2007 (3:38 am)
Reply

Replying to: bohica223 (Aug 25, 2007 8:52 pm)

I think I have proposed this before....
 
I think I have noted that the "flare" happens mostly after a "cold" start and basically doesn't repeat once the vehicle driveline, ATF, has warmed to operating level. And remember that when the ATF is cold it has less volume.
 
ATF has WEIGHT and cost, $$$, the less you put into the transaxle at the factory you are better off from an engineering standpoint, FE, and from the beancounters standpoint.
 
My suggestion would be that if you are experiencing the flare as above then while the engine/transaxle is cold, top off the ATF, only to the dipstick's cold measuring level, being careful NOT to overfill (at least not by very much).
 
I think I have also read that before you start out COLD if you idle the car for 5-10 minutes the flare doesn't occur. Not suggesting anyone do this as anything other than a test.
 
I think if I owned one of these and grew intolerant of the flare I would remove the transaxle sump and find a way to increase its volume just ever so slightly.
#484 of 851
Re: Have been following this review & would like to comment [bohica223] by wwest
Aug 26, 2007 (3:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: bohica223 (Aug 25, 2007 8:52 pm)

" I've never seem this many complaints about an issue with any of the other cars you mentioned.."
 
If you restrict the issue to "flare" then I would agree. I was addressing the issue from the context of the 1-2 second downshift delay created by DBW to prevent premature failure of the transaxle.
#485 of 851
Following the issue; Following the trend; Following the market leader by user777
Aug 26, 2007 (4:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: bohica223 (Aug 25, 2007 8:52 pm)

in some sense, by virtue of the very fact toyota is releasing TSBs is admission there are issues. some owners are getting new transmissions, some new solenoid assemblies, some new firmware or both hardware and software.
 
there's shift flares, excessive shifting, vague shifting, hesitation, uncontrolled acceleration. have i forgotten some behaviors here?
 
some have a greatly improved vehicle when the TSBs are applied, and some say the problems return later.
 
so, there are probably a few factors at root cause here and not everyone is experiencing the exact same issue or issues. in my mind, because of the computer integration between engine and transmission control, we are left to speculate as to what is truly the cause.
 
in the bigger picture, this speaks volumes to what is likely to happen as our vehicles (the make is irrelevant) become more and more complex, computerized, and sub-systems integrated in the name of fuel economy, safety, and parts longevity (now that's a good one).
 
expect technicians and vehicle owners to be stupified by bizzare behaviors, and explainations provided by the manufacturer or dealers or technicians to be pithy, non-reassuring, inaccurate, or just plain wrong.
 
expect customer-centric dealerships and their employees to be placed in awkward positions of having to state "cannot duplicate" or "operating as designed" or "they all do that" thus adhering to the party line as they await a highly scripted "fix" which can only come from the manufacturer.
 
expect the fixes to involve complete sub-system change outs as traditional maintenance techniques will no longer apply; black box modules or sub-assemblies too technically rich for the dealerships to service themselves will have to be swapped out until the real problem is identified.
 
expect long waits as part commonality among models result in shortages.
 
anticipate that the criticality of software function requires a good deal of quality review and testing to assure no negative fuel economy, safety, parts longevity, or user expectation impact as new firmware is readied for deployment to the engine control and transmission control computers in our vehicles.
 
expect we'll be forced more and more to be driven by our vehicles, rather than the other way around - being forced to adapt and change our driving style to match these "smart" "adaptive" technologies.
 
expect our learned behaviors, some deeply adopted by our brains over the course of decades (of living and experience in other domains, or in the driving domain itself) to collide with these new behaviors.
 
some of these behaviors will be artifacts of the systems being designed and tested by engineers without adherence and sensitivity to fundamental human factors / usability principles.
 
we need an independant organization like the NHTSA agressively investigating claims when a trend surfaces. and we probably need more transparency on the part of manufacturers when the situation is calling for TSBs and "secret service campaigns" vs. recalls.
 
we also need to know if and when an organization like the NHTSA is actively investigating complaints on a make and model.
 
it's admittedly unfair that toyota seems to be under a microscope on the issue. they design and build products consumers what and find valuable; they are the ones with the expectation of quality; they have been proactive adopting these new technologies and bringing it to their product lines at price points we expect and accept; they are the segment leader in many respects.
 
so their responsibility and ownership on issues like this must be elevated. they must be an exemplar. that's moving forward.

Messages Page 49 of 86
1
...
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
...
86
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement