Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X

Is the car going to have leather seats or any other creature features ???? Just curious...
 
Rocky

Replies to this message:
• rcpax (Dec 21, 2006 8:23 pm)
  • rockylee (Dec 22, 2006 10:09 am)

Replying to: rockylee (Dec 21, 2006 5:48 am)

Replies to this message:
• rockylee (Dec 22, 2006 10:09 am)

Replying to: rcpax (Dec 21, 2006 8:23 pm)

rcpax,
 
Okay I was just hoping you might of had some inside info. I will definetly take a look at one when it becomes available. The cool AWD system has me licking my chops. I hope this car will run 0-60 in 4.5 or quicker. I also hope that the EVO-X gets the 350 hp. turbo engine. It might be able to turn Nissan Skyline GT-R type numbers which would be really cool for a car that costs several thousand dollar less.
 
Rocky

Replying to: rcpax (Dec 18, 2006 8:05 pm)

The fact that the Lancer has doors that cut into the body frame disturbs me.
 
   The last Evo, and most new cars, have frameless doors. The market has left that practice about 15 years ago.
   
   Every picture shows frameless doors, but the production vehicle has frames.
 
   Evo X Concept had no frames. Hopefully, Mitsu won't drop the ball here. Definitely cheapens the look, and exposes it's econo-car roots, circa-1986.
 
   DrFill

Love it or hate it. Here is the new Prototype X hinting the looks of the upcoming Evo X. IMO, this car looks menacing. Can't wait to get it homologated and start doing rallies in Europe and Asia. I hope Mitsu sticks to its plan to return to the WRC in 08 with the WR Car version of this machine.
 

 

 

Replies to this message:
• rockylee (Jan 17, 2007 2:46 am)
  • rockylee (Jan 17, 2007 4:07 am)

Replies to this message:
• byronwalter (Jan 11, 2007 12:38 pm)
  • rcpax (Jan 11, 2007 7:12 pm)
    • byronwalter (Jan 12, 2007 4:46 am) and 2 more...

Replying to: rcpax (Jan 09, 2007 8:32 pm)

Replies to this message:
• rcpax (Jan 11, 2007 7:12 pm)
  • byronwalter (Jan 12, 2007 4:46 am)
    • rastfox (May 05, 2007 3:20 am) and 1 more...

Replying to: byronwalter (Jan 11, 2007 12:38 pm)

Replies to this message:
• byronwalter (Jan 12, 2007 4:46 am)
  • rastfox (May 05, 2007 3:20 am)
    • rockylee (May 05, 2007 10:41 pm)

Replying to: rcpax (Jan 11, 2007 7:12 pm)

As long as the car isn't ugly... is good enough for me... after all, it's the driving & performance that are the key issues (give me an ugly woman that can cook ).
 
In fact the current Evo is pretty tempting. I just wish that the interior was a little better with a vertical adjustment for the driver's seat (I'm 5'6").
 
But as you probably know, the STI is scheduled for a major revision for '08 and at this time there really is only speculation as to what Subaru is going to do. We know that the current generation of Evo is a step above the current STI (but both are great). I've ridden in an Evo and was impressed and I've driven an STI, both yummy good. My present ride is an '06 Audi A4 with an ECU upgrade and virtually all the options so I'm a little spoiled on the aesthetics. The car handles great but I'm not kidding myself when it comes to the engines. Wish that EG63 Mitsu four was in my Audi!
 
Byron

Replies to this message:
• rastfox (May 05, 2007 3:20 am)
  • rockylee (May 05, 2007 10:41 pm)

Replies to this message:
• byronwalter (Jan 15, 2007 9:56 am)
  • rockylee (Jan 17, 2007 2:21 am)