Sign In Join 



Volvo XC90 Buying Used

97 messages,  Last post on Sep 02, 2009 at 6:53 PM

You are in the Volvo XC90 / XC60 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Volvo XC90, Car Buying, SUV


Messages Page 7 of 11
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#52 of 97
Re: Considering a XC90 [qbrozen] by skylab
Nov 26, 2008 (11:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Nov 26, 2008 9:45 am)

As an owner of an 05 XC90, which has had no mechanical issues so far, I agree. Used values on these are very attractive, particularly in the NorthEast where there is a lot of inventory after people panic-dumped their SUVs during the recent oil price spike.
 
Stay away from the T6 and just be aware that XC90s are hard on tires and wheel bearings because of their weight. This is, of course, a trade-off with the extensive (and heavy) safety features like the reinforced roof/roll cage and personally I'd rather be alive than get 6,000 more miles on my Michelins.
#53 of 97
Re: Considering a XC90 [skylab] by qbrozen
Nov 26, 2008 (7:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: skylab (Nov 26, 2008 11:01 am)

I think the tires has to do with alignment and bearings. Our tires are holding up very well so far. Several folks I've heard from say they were going through tires until getting a good alignment done.
 
The XC90 isn't much heavier than most mid-sized SUVs. About the same as our previous Pacifica and only a couple hundred pounds more than the Pilot we had before that.
#54 of 97
Question on 2006 Volvo XC90 2.5L Turbo by irishcasey
Nov 27, 2008 (10:03 am)
Reply
I'm considering buying this model from dealer. It is Volvo Certified, has 40K miles. Does NOT have leather, heated seats, sunroof, seven passenger seating. Also it is a 2 wheel drive model.
Dealer wants $18,800.
 
Any thoughts would be appreciated. Also has this model had the transmission problems (I think those were primarily on the T6 models).
#55 of 97
Re: Question on 2006 Volvo XC90 2.5L Turbo [irishcasey] by skylab
Nov 27, 2008 (11:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: irishcasey (Nov 27, 2008 10:03 am)

Galves trade-in value on that car is $11K. I'd pass. If you shop around you should be able to get one with Premium and AWD for near that asking price.
 
The 2.5T has not had any major issues. It's a solid engine, albeit a little underpowered for the vehicle.
#56 of 97
Re: Question on 2006 Volvo XC90 2.5L Turbo [skylab] by qbrozen
Nov 27, 2008 (11:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: skylab (Nov 27, 2008 11:05 am)

I don't get why some folks say this. What kind of vehicle are we comparing it to? Out of all our SUVs (Forester, Pilot, Pacifica), our 2.5T AWD XC90 is the fastest, hands down. I have to be careful with the pedal, as a matter of fact, to prevent chirping the tires (once past the turbo lag) when accelerating and turning at the same time.
 
But, because I hear this stated so often, I gotta wonder if we didn't somehow luck out and get a particularly fast one. *shrug*
 
Although I wouldn't be terribly surprised. When I had my S70 T5, there were reports of acceleration times all over the map with the auto trans. Most clustered around 7 secs 0-60. Some reached up towards 8 secs and some down near 6. I clocked my own with OBDII software and was able to squeeze out a 6.2. Don't know if its a volvo thing or a turbo thing. Probably the latter.
#57 of 97
Re: Question on 2006 Volvo XC90 2.5L Turbo [qbrozen] by skylab
Nov 27, 2008 (11:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Nov 27, 2008 11:09 am)

I say this because I drive it every day and that's how I find it.
 
Some of it is probably just turbo lag off the line, but 208hp and 4,500 lbs curb weight is never going to make for a highly spirited performer. Not that this is the primary selling point of the vehicle, obviously. Anyway, once I'm out of warranty next year, I'll flash the ECU up to 260hp and see how that suits me.
 
I take it you do agree that nearly $20K for a stripper '06 is hardly a screaming deal, though?
#58 of 97
Re: Question on 2006 Volvo XC90 2.5L Turbo [skylab] by qbrozen
Nov 29, 2008 (1:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: skylab (Nov 27, 2008 11:24 am)

Oh, yeah, without a doubt.
 
I don't have my galves subscription updated, but you gave the number, and I'm sure its accurate.
 
Back on that engine thing, I have pondered the reflash, too, but the more I drive it, the more I feel its unnecessary. From about 10 mph up, that truck builds speed real quick. Don't forget, while the hp number may not be up to par with a V6, the torque IS, and it comes on full bore at relatively low rpms. Once that turbo spins up, I've left many V8 SUVs in the dust.
#60 of 97
Need your opinion on lease buyout by jabber
Dec 18, 2008 (7:40 pm)
Reply
I have an '06 XC90 2.5t AWD with Prem, Climate, and DVD Ent. It is a 5-seater, not 7 and has 52,000 miles on it (all driven my myself and my wife). Our lease is up at the end of the month. I have an opportunity to buy the car from the leasing bank for $14,953 + $1047 NJ tax = $16,000 flat. They are negotiating the buyout from the original residual. I'm tempted since we like the car and we've also spent about $800 putting new tires and front brake pads on in the last 6 months. Good deal or should I return it?
#61 of 97
Re: Need your opinion on lease buyout [jabber] by skylab
Dec 20, 2008 (1:49 pm)
Reply

Replying to: jabber (Dec 18, 2008 7:40 pm)

I think that's very fair. They're offering it to you at right around book value -- so if you like the car, maintained it well and have money in new tires and brakes then buying it off lease makes good sense.

Messages Page 7 of 11
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement