Sign In Join 



Volvo XC90 Buying Used

97 messages,  Last post on Sep 02, 2009 at 6:53 PM

You are in the Volvo XC90 / XC60 Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & tidester

What is this discussion about? Volvo XC90, Car Buying, SUV


Messages Page 6 of 10
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#47 of 97
Re: [iontrap] by skylab
Nov 23, 2008 (10:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: iontrap (Nov 22, 2008 7:05 pm)

Unless it's certified, or absolutely loaded with options, that seems expensive. Cars.com shows dozens of 2007s with less miles for less money.
#48 of 97
Considering a XC90 by pasuk
Nov 25, 2008 (5:05 pm)
Reply
I have been in the market for a AWD or 4WD vehicle for some time now. Looking for a large vehicle for kids/dogs that I can be happy with for many years.
 
I am considering the purchase of a used XC90 with approx 20,000 miles. I am worried about some of the posts I have seen re: reliability. I have also considered an '08 Toyota Highlander gently used or new if I can get out the door with a rock bottom price.
 
Thoughts??
#49 of 97
Re: Considering a XC90 [pasuk] by qbrozen
Nov 26, 2008 (7:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: pasuk (Nov 25, 2008 5:05 pm)

I can find you negative posts about Highlanders, too.
Think about it, how many folks do you know seek out a forum on the internet just to say they are having no problems with their vehicle?
All you need to do is stay away from the T6 model and you'll be fine.
#50 of 97
Re: Considering a XC90 [qbrozen] by pasuk
Nov 26, 2008 (7:33 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Nov 26, 2008 7:20 am)

Very true. What are your feelings on depeciation of both vehicles?
#51 of 97
Re: Considering a XC90 [pasuk] by qbrozen
Nov 26, 2008 (9:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: pasuk (Nov 26, 2008 7:33 am)

SUVs are taking a beating in general. But, I'd think that Toyotas are still depreciating less than Volvos. However, as long as you are buying used, that makes the Volvo a better deal in my opinion. More vehicle for the same money, as it were. Test drive them back to back and I think you'll agree.
#52 of 97
Re: Considering a XC90 [qbrozen] by skylab
Nov 26, 2008 (11:01 am)
Reply

Replying to: qbrozen (Nov 26, 2008 9:45 am)

As an owner of an 05 XC90, which has had no mechanical issues so far, I agree. Used values on these are very attractive, particularly in the NorthEast where there is a lot of inventory after people panic-dumped their SUVs during the recent oil price spike.
 
Stay away from the T6 and just be aware that XC90s are hard on tires and wheel bearings because of their weight. This is, of course, a trade-off with the extensive (and heavy) safety features like the reinforced roof/roll cage and personally I'd rather be alive than get 6,000 more miles on my Michelins.
#53 of 97
Re: Considering a XC90 [skylab] by qbrozen
Nov 26, 2008 (7:01 pm)
Reply

Replying to: skylab (Nov 26, 2008 11:01 am)

I think the tires has to do with alignment and bearings. Our tires are holding up very well so far. Several folks I've heard from say they were going through tires until getting a good alignment done.
 
The XC90 isn't much heavier than most mid-sized SUVs. About the same as our previous Pacifica and only a couple hundred pounds more than the Pilot we had before that.
#54 of 97
Question on 2006 Volvo XC90 2.5L Turbo by irishcasey
Nov 27, 2008 (10:03 am)
Reply
I'm considering buying this model from dealer. It is Volvo Certified, has 40K miles. Does NOT have leather, heated seats, sunroof, seven passenger seating. Also it is a 2 wheel drive model.
Dealer wants $18,800.
 
Any thoughts would be appreciated. Also has this model had the transmission problems (I think those were primarily on the T6 models).
#55 of 97
Re: Question on 2006 Volvo XC90 2.5L Turbo [irishcasey] by skylab
Nov 27, 2008 (11:05 am)
Reply

Replying to: irishcasey (Nov 27, 2008 10:03 am)

Galves trade-in value on that car is $11K. I'd pass. If you shop around you should be able to get one with Premium and AWD for near that asking price.
 
The 2.5T has not had any major issues. It's a solid engine, albeit a little underpowered for the vehicle.
#56 of 97
Re: Question on 2006 Volvo XC90 2.5L Turbo [skylab] by qbrozen
Nov 27, 2008 (11:09 am)
Reply

Replying to: skylab (Nov 27, 2008 11:05 am)

I don't get why some folks say this. What kind of vehicle are we comparing it to? Out of all our SUVs (Forester, Pilot, Pacifica), our 2.5T AWD XC90 is the fastest, hands down. I have to be careful with the pedal, as a matter of fact, to prevent chirping the tires (once past the turbo lag) when accelerating and turning at the same time.
 
But, because I hear this stated so often, I gotta wonder if we didn't somehow luck out and get a particularly fast one. *shrug*
 
Although I wouldn't be terribly surprised. When I had my S70 T5, there were reports of acceleration times all over the map with the auto trans. Most clustered around 7 secs 0-60. Some reached up towards 8 secs and some down near 6. I clocked my own with OBDII software and was able to squeeze out a 6.2. Don't know if its a volvo thing or a turbo thing. Probably the latter.

Messages Page 6 of 10
1
...
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement