Last post on Feb 16, 2009 at 7:47 AM
You are in the Suzuki SX4
What is this discussion about?
Suzuki SX4, Hatchback, SUV
Article comments for Full Test: 2007 Suzuki SX4 - We spent two weeks with this charming little hottie and found it to be, well, charming. Although it's a little light on frills, the SX4 is roomy, comfortable and cute. In fact, more than one person said our Racy Red test car looked like a candy apple on wheels. (more)
#24 of 27 Re: AVC [sedici]
Aug 06, 2007 (3:20 pm)
I have to put mine on level 3 to get any results. It helps some, and I don't have to turn the volume down as much when I come off of the freeway, or up as much when I'm back up to speed. I agree that they should have given a broader range of adjustment, especially on a small car that has quite a bit of road and engine noise. I also have trouble getting enough contrast to read the display easily on a bright day. Overall, I think it's a great car, though!
#25 of 27 2008 SX4 FWD
May 29, 2008 (8:11 am)
I live here in Abu Dhabi, i got a black 2008 SX4 FWD (hatchback) stick shift they dont offer the AWD here but i still bought the car, it drives well and the torque is above average since it weighs only 2420 lbs. without the AWD.
Feb 16, 2009 (7:34 am)
The sx4 awd is the only sub compact to offer awd, it is unique. The only cars to compare it to are the more expensive Imprezza, Matrix, or Calibre. I think Suzuki made a wise decsion adding weight to the structure, I've seen the crash tests. Awd adds 250lbs or better why compare this car to a Fit or Versa?
#27 of 27 Re: I don't think [nippononly]
Feb 16, 2009 (7:47 am)
Exactly, and many of us think AWD is much better than not. How does the GTR out perform the 911 afterall. I think this car is the best solution for inclement weather, and it is fun and strong all the rest of the time as well. Also the potential exists to mod this car into a wrx killer . $ 5000=turbo=225hp is anyone hearing me?