Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Sedans Honda Accord Honda Accord vs Nissan Altima
297 messages, Last post on Jan 19, 2009 at 4:57 AM
You are in the Honda Accord Forum. Your Hosts are pat & karens
|
Replying to: madpistol (Jun 14, 2008 7:59 pm) 
|
|
|
Replying to: xfumbler (Jul 26, 2008 8:50 pm) The Altima also has a CVT w/ 6-speed manual shift mode vs. The Accord's 5-speed Auto w/ no manual shift mode. Advantage: Altima... no question.
|
|
|
Replying to: madpistol (Jul 26, 2008 9:04 pm) http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=123357
|
|
|
Replying to: elroy5 (Jul 26, 2008 9:34 pm) What I DO know is that I've driven the '08 Accord EX-L 4-cyl and '08 Altima 2.5 SL sedans back-to-back, and the Altima is quicker, more fuel efficient, has more features, and is more fun to drive. All of this combined with a lower price tag makes the Altima sedan an excellent value compared to the '08 Accord sedan. The way I look at it, if you want a larger back seat and stability control, get the Accord. For everything else, get the Altima. I've had my '08 Altima 2.5 SL sedan for 3 months now, and I have no regrets at all. I sometimes wonder if I should have gotten the Accord, but then I think about all the stuff that the Altima comes with that the Accord doesn't. It makes me love my Altima even more. One more thing... '08 Accord = 8.9 '08 Altima = 9.3 It seems that most people agree with me. It's just too bad that most people don't do several months worth of research before they buy their cars. |
|
|
Replying to: madpistol (Jul 26, 2008 9:04 pm) So despite all of the Altima and Accord's flaws, they atleast are thinking of the basic requirements of the car. Certainly not skimping out on fit and finish or compromising anything to save money, because I don't feel that when I see these cars, when compared to "other" models.
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: bvdj84 (Jul 27, 2008 5:25 am) Why? Its about having the engine in its efficiency band. The engine should be able to get to peak horsepower, peak torque, or peak economy. Adding gears in a marketing campaign to compensate for a razor thin powerband in the motor doesn't mean everyone needs to go around adding mechanical complexity to their transmissions. I would worry more about fuel economy and performance measures than how many gears something has.
|
|
|
Replying to: lilengineerboy (Jul 27, 2008 6:16 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: bvdj84 (Jul 27, 2008 1:23 pm) Yeah, they should invent a transmission that is continuously variable. This would be great, the car would never have to shift. It could provide a smooth, fast, efficient automobile. Someday they'll make it happen.
|
|
|
Replying to: karpediem (Jul 28, 2008 7:21 pm) I don't know how to drive a manual, but if someone gave me the keys to that, I would learn, FAST! That cars is absolutely awesome!
|
|
|
Replying to: bvdj84 (Jul 29, 2008 5:14 am) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Sedans Honda Accord Honda Accord vs Nissan Altima
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Nissan Altima
2010 Honda Accord
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
