- #435 of 550
-
Re: Tundra works that hi-way hard... not them fields... [h20]
by cruiser69
-
Jan 07, 2008 (7:33 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: h20 (Jan 05, 2008 7:23 pm)
LOL, way to go, H20. I have had wonderfuly detailed replies to his ranting but what a suprise, no response. Looks like he should stay in dem fields and off the forums...never left the county now...using some of his own product i thinks........yeszereeee.... He like pictures of dem trucks on his farm...a relic...rustin away.
|
- #436 of 550
-
Re: Tundra works that hi-way hard... not them fields... [h20]
by obyone
-
Jan 07, 2008 (11:21 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: h20 (Jan 05, 2008 7:23 pm)
You ever get that unidentifiable noise fixed on your Tundra? Ever figure out what it was?
Good luck on this one now.
|
- #437 of 550
-
Re: Tundra works that hi-way hard... not them fields... [cruiser69]
by farmerrube
-
Jan 07, 2008 (5:43 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: cruiser69 (Jan 07, 2008 7:33 am)
That one you be callin that relic is workin hard well over 50 years now. We hauled with that one as a younger. But where is all them hi-lux and t100 ones gone? Rustin and bustin, the way of them forien ones now. That tundra got that camry frame and sheet metal, good for workin that hi-way, but not them farms now. What part of this one aint folks gettin? Try workin that tundar one in them fields, then see which one gets parked quicker now! Facts is facts on this one now. Good luck on this one now!
|
- #438 of 550
-
Re: Tundra works that hi-way hard... not them fields... [farmerrube]
by cruiser69
-
Jan 08, 2008 (8:26 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: farmerrube (Jan 07, 2008 5:43 pm)
Already answered all of your questions rube....scroll back and read the replies for a change. T-100 is not a full size truck. If you search online, most t-100's are still running and have at least 250,000 miles, and no rust. Plus their resale is higher than any of the old stuff you got. Compare the right classes rube. 1/2 ton to 1/2 ton, 3/4 to 3/4 and so on. You dont compare a 3/4 ton to a 1/2 ton. Problem with understanding or something? When Toyota and Nissan do make 3/4 tons, you bet they will be in them fields. New GM trucks got 88 technical service bullitons for all kinds of engine, electrical and drivetrain problems. Your trucks never leave the fields so what does that prove? Its called using a tractor rube. Its cheaper to operate and maintain. Your crop is not that heavy anyway.
Plus a Camry does not have a frame, it has a unibody. The first generation Tundra, not t-100, had a fully boxed frame with eight crossmembers, no one else did at the time of its introduction. But again, i already said that. Toyota trucks dont sell where you live because of back water discrimination from people like you, afraid of change. I bet you still own a Zenith tv from the 70's. Thank God the good Lord invented an ignorance control method known as passing away.
|
- #439 of 550
-
Re: Tundra works that hi-way hard... not them fields... [cruiser69]
by farmerrube
-
Jan 08, 2008 (1:08 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: cruiser69 (Jan 08, 2008 8:26 am)
Your wrong on them ones fella... that factory called them t100 ones and them littler tundra ones "full size" now. That factory even called them hi-lux ones 3/4 tonners now! Facts is facts on that one now. So your tellin us that factory tricked folks back then now? What is too say that factory aint still trickin folks with that new tundra one now? And if all them forien ones is still workin, where is them ones? You sure you put that eyeball on them ones? Nope, them ones is rustin and bustin... that is where them hi-lux ones is. Get ya a big3 one if you plan on workin that one any, get ya that tundra one if ya plan on gettin tricked or fad chasin! Good luck on this one now!
|
- #440 of 550
-
Ford only builds CRAP
by mschmal
-
Jan 10, 2008 (12:46 pm)
-
|
People think Ford just can't build a reliable desirable car.
Check out the Fusion/Milan problems and solutions board.
mschmal, "Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan Maintenance & Repair" #1, 7 Mar 2007 8:51 am
I started this forum back in March of 07 and there are ALREADY 34 posts!
Mark
|
- #441 of 550
-
09 F150
by markan
-
Jan 15, 2008 (5:38 pm)
-
|
|
After seeing pictures from the Detroit show I am not impressed with the front end styling at all. I've been waiting for this truck to replace my 01 F150 but now I'm not sure it is worth the wait. I was hoping for the new "Boss" to go along with the 6 speed. What does everyone else think about the new look?
|
- #442 of 550
-
Re: 09 F150 [markan]
by obyone
-
Jan 15, 2008 (11:56 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: markan (Jan 15, 2008 5:38 pm)
What's more impressive is the '09 Ram. Check it out
2009 Dodge Ram
|
- #443 of 550
-
Re: 09 F150 [obyone]
by andy82471
-
Jan 16, 2008 (8:41 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: obyone (Jan 15, 2008 11:56 pm)
And people call the Tundra ugly. Yuck !!!!!!!!!!!!! Hideous. Chrysler is heading straight for bankruptcy.
|
- #444 of 550
-
Re: 09 F150 [obyone]
by cruiser69
-
Jan 16, 2008 (12:24 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: obyone (Jan 15, 2008 11:56 pm)
Well, its not too bad i guess. Looks like a Transformer truck. Lots of creases, gaps, and square bits. The bed rail box is neat but makes it look unclean. Plus, you cant put a cap on the truck with that. I know caps aren't cool but they make a truck very practical with concealed, dry storage. The interior is top notch though. I like how Dodge made the excuse of not increasing the payload and torque by saying not many people tow that much without going to a heavy duty. True to a point, but the half tons that can have such a heavy curb weight now you can use a half ton to tow that much. Plus, the Rams fuel economy remains unimpressive. As for maximum payload, well, the 06 Tundra before the redesign had almost that much payload and had a nice ride. Still, i think its worth a test drive to be fair to Dodge. Always willing to give them another try.
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Pickups 
