You are here:
Forums
Pickups
Ford F-Series
Full-size pickup sales - F-150 best selling truck, but for how much longer??

550 messages, Last post on Nov 15, 2009 at 7:37 PM
You are in the Ford F-Series Forum. Your Host is kcram
|
What surprise does NAIAS hold in store? What the 2009 F-150 better offer if Ford wants to stay on top. 1st are given. Things that Ford needs or they should just close. - Stability Control standard. - Curtain air bags standard. - Interior upgraded to similar to Expedition only with push through controls for radio and HVAC as Focus and Escape Now things I think Ford MUST do for the 2009 Ford F-150. - 6 speed Auto trans. - 3.5L V6 with 250HP and 250LBFT of Torque possibly replacing the 4.6L - Keep the 4.6L only with the 3V head from the Mustang/Explorer for 290hp and 325 LBFT of torque. - Enhance the 5.4L to at least 350hp/390 LBFT - BOSS 6.2L V8 with 380hp/450 lbft of torque - 4.4L Diesel 330 hp/ 500+ lbft of torque. - tail gate step and bed extended from Super Duty. WISH LIST IRS from Expedition 3.5L V6 twin force with 28mpg. Hydraulic Hybrid with 60mpg city. |
|
|
Replying to: andrew9 (Dec 17, 2006 8:05 pm) Tough Looks Ratings: 1) 2008 Toyota Tundra 2) 2008 Ford F-150 3) 2008 Dodge Ram 1500 4) 2008 GM Silverado/Sierra 5) 2008 Nissan Titan 6) 2008 Honda Ridgeline (as for looks, its not pretty with non tough looks like Titan, but its rediculous on how hard Honda tried, thierfore it got last on my list)
|
|
|
|
|
We need ones with haul... like them big3 ones. We work them trucks, on that farm now. Trouble with them forien ones is they bust or rust... so they aint last long or workin hard. We still work this 52 haulin... We haul these trains... six to seven of them ones... nose to tail now... Can that tundra work them fields and last long? Can that tundra haul six to seven trains, day in and out, year to year? Them big3 ones do now, thats for sure. What say too this one now? Good luck on this one now!
|
|
|
Replying to: kboynton1 (Jan 02, 2008 6:03 pm) Looks are subjective. Some might say the Tundra is ugly. Does ugly equate to toughness? One thing Toyota is not known for is styling. |
|
|
Replying to: farmerrube (Jan 02, 2008 6:16 pm)
|
|
|
..............Dec 07 / Dec 06 / +/- / CY 2007 / CY 2006 / +/- ------------------------------------------------------------ F-Series / 55,069 / 70,580 / -22.0 / 690,589 / 796,039 / -13.2 Silverado / 53,560 / 52,396 / 2.2 / 618,257 / 636,069 / -2.8 Ram / 32,118 / 32,875 / -2.0 / 358,295 / 364,177 / -2.0 Sierra / 19,782 / 17,541 / 12.8 / 208,243 / 210,736 / -1.2 Tundra / 19,219 / 12,468 / 54.1 / 196,555 / 124,508 / 57.4 Titan / 4,785 / 5,575 / -14.2 / 65,746 / 72,192 / -9.2 Mark LT / 551 / 1,155 / -52.3 / 8,382 / 12,753 / -34.3 Toyota damn near made their target... give 'em credit, although it took some massive incentives to do it. Ford took a beating this year; loss of over 100,000 units is a problem. The 09 F150 and Ram 1500 will both debut at Detroit/NAIAS in a couple of weeks, so Toyota and GM will see if the bar was matched or raised. kcram - Pickups Host
|
|
|
Replying to: farmerrube (Jan 02, 2008 6:16 pm) |
|
|
|
|
Replying to: mule4 (Jan 03, 2008 8:46 am)
|
|
|
Replying to: kcram (Jan 03, 2008 1:35 pm) Ford has a huge problem. I read their financial problems are so deep they can't afford a full redesign of the F-150 so they're just "refreshening" the interior, grill, and some other minor tweaks. Long-term that's a failed strategy. The Tundra doesn't have to be as good as the rest of the pack, IMHO, because it's a Toyota. I know that sounds strange but I know a lot of people who only shop Toyota. A lot of friends kept impressing upon me the importance of buying a Toyota and nothing else. It isn't even an America vs. Japanese quality issue because only one suggested the Honda Ridgeline or the Nissan Titan. I could tell them the big differences in features/price/reliability between it and the Sierra I had discovered but it didn't impact them. It's a Toyota and, by definition, it's better than the rest. Who cares if they're recalled it twice? Who cares if the interior is sub-par? Who cares if it only has 4-star crash ratings? Who cares if the offer Toyota gave me on an '07 was over $5k greater than the offer I got on a better optioned '08 Sierra? It's gotta be inherently better. It's gotta be worth the $$$ premium. The fact is Honda is the top-rated car brand according to Consumer Reports. Toyota's actually slipping in their quality ratings. Tundras aren't yet really competing in the work truck category from what I've seen and heard. So the fact they aren't as tough (e.g., lack a fully boxed frame) as domestic full-size trucks isn't an issue yet. The casual users who are buying it for carrying DIY home projects and hauling junk to the dump don't care. It does surprise me that the Tundra doesn't offer a more sophisticated 4x4 system so these commuters can easily switch to it in snow and heavy rain but I'm sure Toyota will fix that problem in later model years. But the topic is asking if the Tundra will overtake the F-150 in sales just as Toyota dominates in other categories like minivans and cars. IMHO, they don't have a chance with the current design. To get volume it needs to become a fleet work truck. Toyota's bloated price makes that a difficult proposition. However, it does stand a chance of becoming a dominant fixture in the suburbs where affluent yuppies are more than happy to pay premiums for the 'prestige' of owning a Toyota. I've owned 2 Toyotas. Fine cars. But I paid a huge premium for them. Fine in the '80s when Detroit and Europe were pumping out unreliable junkers and the reliability choice came down pretty much to Honda vs. Toyota. Cars have generally gotten more reliable plus there are more good alternatives to Toyota (and Honda) like Hyundai. It'll be interesting to see how long Toyota can ride it's reputation. I just read a Consumer Reports' review of SUVs with 3 rows of seating. The Toyota Highlander was rated the best SUV they've ever tested. Really? If you read their review it sounds like a solid choice but hardly overwhelming. Stuff that CR used to choke on, especially when the car came from Detroit, didn't phase them like sub-par interior fit/finish/materials, the lowest crash test score of the group, so-so driving characteristics, weak child seat set-up, and cramped rear seating. The Buick Enclave that came in a clear 2nd in that group (overall, it's the 4th ranked SUV behind an Acura in 2nd and a Honda in 3rd), while hardly perfect, seemed better in all areas except some transmission shifting issues (somewhat fixed by a software upgrade) and poor gas mileage (by 3 mpg in a group of gas hogs so who cares?). Reliability wasn't an issue because both the Highlander and Enclave were new models and CR had no statistics so didn't consider it. Of course, CR has been criticized - rightly so, IMHO - in having a pro-Toyota bias. Domestic car/truck manufacturers have a long way to go in rebuilding their trashed reputations. Designing superior trucks that cost less doesn't appear to be helping them against the Tundra thus far. Over time, if they can keep producing a high-quality product maybe the 'I only buy Toyota' crowd will start to thin.
|
|
You are here:
Forums
Pickups
Ford F-Series
Full-size pickup sales - F-150 best selling truck, but for how much longer??
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Ford F-150
2010 Toyota Tundra
2010 Chevrolet Silverado 1500
2010 Dodge Ram Pickup 1500
2010 GMC Sierra 1500
2010 Nissan Titan



Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats