- #61 of 6098
-
Re: ... [sls002]
by rockylee
-
Nov 28, 2006 (8:33 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Nov 28, 2006 8:13 am)
wow....
Rocky
|
- #62 of 6098
-
Re: ... [sls002]
by anythngbutgm
-
Nov 28, 2006 (9:04 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Nov 28, 2006 8:13 am)
Back in like 04' I drove a CTS with the 3.2? and a stick (Atrocious btw) and I actually ended up with a salesman who went by the name of Slick Rick! Slicked back gray hair, cheap polyester leisure suit, strong smelling cheap cologne... Ugh. I swear I was negotiating with Marlon Brando...
btw Which Nissan are you looking at?
|
- #63 of 6098
-
Re: ... [lemko]
by anythngbutgm
-
Nov 28, 2006 (9:08 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: lemko (Nov 28, 2006 6:42 am)
That exact car with all the "Toys" was parked on the showroom floor next to the CTS that I was looking at at the time. And it was hubcaps, they were wire rims.
I didn't look inside to see if there was a bedpan on the front seat though... 
|
- #64 of 6098
-
Re: ... [anythngbutgm]
by rockylee
-
Nov 28, 2006 (9:14 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: anythngbutgm (Nov 28, 2006 9:08 am)
ROTF !!!! 
Your crazy man.
Rocky
|
- #65 of 6098
-
Re: ... [anythngbutgm]
by lemko
-
Nov 28, 2006 (9:48 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: anythngbutgm (Nov 28, 2006 9:08 am)
Dude, for the billionth time, all that SELF-DESTRUCTIVE ADD-ON JUNK IS AFTERMARKET! If you hate that stuff so much, blame the dealer or the customer with bad taste, not GM. No Cadillac comes that way from the factory. For wire wheel covers one has to assume there are steel wheels underneath. My base 1994 Cadillac Deville that I purchased in November 1993 was as plain as a Cadillac came that year and it nice aluminum wheels standard. Steel wheels with wire wheel covers weren't even an option.
|
- #66 of 6098
-
Re: ... [lemko]
by rockylee
-
Nov 28, 2006 (9:51 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: lemko (Nov 28, 2006 9:48 am)
some of us know that lemko. Some people have such bad tastes and put aftermarket wire rims on nice cars like Cadillacs. 
Rocky
|
- #67 of 6098
-
Re: ... [lemko]
by fintail
-
Nov 28, 2006 (9:55 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: lemko (Nov 28, 2006 9:48 am)
GM should take a stand and publicly castigate the add on crap. It's in the best interest of their own image.
GM can't control the dealers who add the junk, but they can make it clear that they don't support such image-killing accessories.
|
- #68 of 6098
-
Re: ... [rockylee]
by lemko
-
Nov 28, 2006 (9:57 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: rockylee (Nov 28, 2006 9:51 am)
Hopefully, guys who like that add-on garbage will either pass on or go to the retirement home for good. Trouble is, like street drugs, that stuff wouldn't be out there if there wasn't a market for it. You've got to admit, it does affect the opinion of the uninformed. Dealers should be strongly discouraged from selling this crap.
|
- #69 of 6098
-
Re: ... [fintail]
by rockylee
-
Nov 28, 2006 (9:58 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: fintail (Nov 28, 2006 9:55 am)
They could control their dealers from adding that crap on it as a attempt to lure a certain buyer. It's just like some dealers trying to sell those faux convertible tops on the STS a while back. it looked tacky, and the dealer aftermarketed it.
Rocky
|
- #70 of 6098
-
Re: ... [lemko]
by rockylee
-
Nov 28, 2006 (10:00 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: lemko (Nov 28, 2006 9:57 am)
I totally agree with you lemko. It's one thing for a customer to go out and aftermarket it. They don't have a brand image to uphold like a dealer.
Rocky
|
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views 
