Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 586 of 610
1
...
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5851 of 6098
circle by marsha7
Jan 05, 2009 (7:40 pm)
Reply
"The automaker sold nearly 148,000 Cadillacs in January through November, including about 14,800 SRXs. But Toyota Motor Corp.'s Lexus division sold five times as many RXs."...and I am quite sure that no one held a gun to the head of the RX buyers...
 
circle, you make the point clearly...D3, while making cars that some folks want (their sales aren't zero, after all, they still sell in the millions), the "imports" seem to pay more attention to the buyer, since every RX sales was a cannibalized D3 sale, at one point...
 
Reading books lately about auto trade (Comeback, The End of Detroit, Call Me Roger), each book describes the Japanese as companies who try and determine what the customer wants, rather then make what they want and try to sell it...also, Japanese seem to be receptive to feedback from their dealers, in terms of complaints and desires of the customers...The Sienna and Odyssey seem to be designed that way, literally taking 1000s of customers from Chrysler's minivans, as Chrysler just let their design get old while Japanese tried to improve an already good idea...
 
As much as I admire the Japanese for their products and methods of efficient manufacturing, at times I really get PO'd at our Big 3, asking myself how they could miss the onslaught in the 1980s, as plants were built here and their sales were exploding from zero...
 
All the D3 had to do was SIT IN and DRIVE any Accord, Prelude, Camry and a blind man could see the difference in quality, performance, and overall ergonomic design...sit in a Honda and everything is where it should be, easy to reach, nice tactile control, well designed...how could the Big 3 miss the pink elephant in the room???...how could they just not see it???
 
In 1988, I bought a Prelude and a Legend...the Prelude had a 2 liter engine that put out 135 HP, the Legend had a V6 that put out 165 HP...that same year, IIRC, the BIG V8 (302 CID, 5.0 liter) engine in the Ford put out 160 HP...so, the V8 was 2.5 times as large as my Prelude, yet only 25 HP more...in a tank...and the V8 put out 5 HP LESS than my puny V6 in the Legend...couldn't they see ANYTHING???
#5852 of 6098
Re: circle [marsha7] by lemko
Jan 06, 2009 (10:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: marsha7 (Jan 05, 2009 7:40 pm)

the Legend had a V6 that put out 165 HP...that same year
 
My 1988 Buick Park Avenue has a 165 HP V-6. That doesn't seem too impressive nowadays, but the car is still no slouch and seems to have a lot of pep.
#5853 of 6098
lemko by marsha7
Jan 06, 2009 (3:58 pm)
Reply
My criticism was that the Ford V8 only put out 160 HP that year, IIRC...their ads bragged about "V8 power" when it was sickeningly anemic...
#5854 of 6098
Re: lemko [marsha7] by 62vetteefp
Jan 06, 2009 (5:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: marsha7 (Jan 06, 2009 3:58 pm)

What was the torque of both motors in question? HP is not everything.
#5855 of 6098
62 by marsha7
Jan 06, 2009 (6:21 pm)
Reply
Of course you are right, HP isn't everything...but the torque of the V8 was probably as anemic as the HP...certainly not like some diesel, with 175 HP but 400 ft lb of tork, eh???
#5856 of 6098
Re: lemko [62vetteefp] by bumpy
Jan 06, 2009 (6:29 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jan 06, 2009 5:26 pm)

True, but neither is torque once it's translated through the loafy gearing that those anemic V8s were saddled with.
#5857 of 6098
HP \ TQ by rayainsw
Jan 07, 2009 (4:02 am)
Reply
By 1985, the Mustang V8 power was 210 \ 270.
And that TQ curve was broad & flat.
In '87 = 225 \ 300.
The 'feel' was quite different than
you'd find with a typical 4 cyl Prelude...
 
- Ray
TQ junkie
#5858 of 6098
Re: HP \ TQ [rayainsw] by circlew
Jan 07, 2009 (4:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: rayainsw (Jan 07, 2009 4:02 am)

My 1988 Mark VII had the mustang motor that year and did the 1/4 in 8.0 Sec. Funny how that seems slow now. The torque was real nice.
 
225 hp (168 kW) 300 lbf.ft (407 Nm) SEFI (1988 - 1992 ALL) w/ AOD 4 Speed Automatic
 
Regards,
OW
#5859 of 6098
Re: 62 [marsha7] by 62vetteefp
Jan 07, 2009 (5:20 am)
Reply

Replying to: marsha7 (Jan 06, 2009 6:21 pm)

So what were the torques? Was the V8 torque anemic?
#5860 of 6098
Re: HP \ TQ [circlew] by fintail
Jan 07, 2009 (8:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Jan 07, 2009 4:24 am)

You mean 0-60 in 8.0, right?

Messages Page 586 of 610
1
...
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement