Edmunds.com | Inside Line | Auto Observer Your Account | Help | Directory
You are here:
![[F]](http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/townhall/webxicons/site.gif){kind=small}
Forums
Automotive News & Views Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?
6098 messages, Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM
You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires
|
Replying to: marsha7 (Dec 14, 2008 10:11 am)  Three of the ten engines on the list were Big 3 iron. Some engines, like the one in the Vette ZR1, didn't make the cut because the vehicles they are in cost too much to be considered under Ward's criteria (a $54,000 cap). Wards was leaning towards greener engines this year I guess. They liked the GM engine in the CTS because it has direct-gasoline injection, and cranks out a lot of HP on regular. |
|
|
Time to say goodbye to sls. Just one last note for you: we're not writing utter nonsense. Then again, think whatever you want, it's your right to do so. I'm not sure profit is coming back anytime soon, if at all for GM and Chrysler. Many households in my neighbourhood signed a petition letter to our reps basically saying 1) They're disappointed by the government's decision to give GM and Chrysler bailout with barely any strings attached, and 2) That GM and Chrysler have lost them as customers until every cent of the bailout is returned. Not too many people signed, only 229. However in a living community of roughly 280-300 houses it sounds plenty. This is my living area only, I dare bet there are lots of others out there. Given current situation, I'm not sure even GM can ignore that. Karma, I say... OTOH GM made a solid start with CTS, and the current CTS deserve the title world class, at last. One step, good one but not enough. Just make sure the next step doesn't send GM back to the bottomless pit. This will perhaps be my last entry on this thread. I finally conclude (to myself, indeed) that there are 3 ways to turn Cadillac into a world standard again: 1) If the company goes BK now, and restructure focusing on core brands like Chevy and Cadillac. 2) If GM somehow, miraculously receive enlightment and start restructuring now, assuming they start getting profit soon. Or... 3) No way it's gonna happen with GM, just sell it to someone who can. Happy new year to everyone. Also, goodluck, GM, you're seriously gonna need it. |
|
 2009 Detroit Auto Show: 2010 Cadillac SRX
|
|
|
Replying to: steve_ (Jan 04, 2009 5:20 pm) Cadillac sales fell 24 percent in the first 11 months of 2008, about on par with U.S. light truck and SUV sales overall. The automaker sold nearly 148,000 Cadillacs in January through November, including about 14,800 SRXs. But Toyota Motor Corp.'s Lexus division sold five times as many RXs. Regards, OW |
|
|
"The automaker sold nearly 148,000 Cadillacs in January through November, including about 14,800 SRXs. But Toyota Motor Corp.'s Lexus division sold five times as many RXs."...and I am quite sure that no one held a gun to the head of the RX buyers... circle, you make the point clearly...D3, while making cars that some folks want (their sales aren't zero, after all, they still sell in the millions), the "imports" seem to pay more attention to the buyer, since every RX sales was a cannibalized D3 sale, at one point... Reading books lately about auto trade (Comeback, The End of Detroit, Call Me Roger), each book describes the Japanese as companies who try and determine what the customer wants, rather then make what they want and try to sell it...also, Japanese seem to be receptive to feedback from their dealers, in terms of complaints and desires of the customers...The Sienna and Odyssey seem to be designed that way, literally taking 1000s of customers from Chrysler's minivans, as Chrysler just let their design get old while Japanese tried to improve an already good idea... As much as I admire the Japanese for their products and methods of efficient manufacturing, at times I really get PO'd at our Big 3, asking myself how they could miss the onslaught in the 1980s, as plants were built here and their sales were exploding from zero... All the D3 had to do was SIT IN and DRIVE any Accord, Prelude, Camry and a blind man could see the difference in quality, performance, and overall ergonomic design...sit in a Honda and everything is where it should be, easy to reach, nice tactile control, well designed...how could the Big 3 miss the pink elephant in the room???...how could they just not see it??? In 1988, I bought a Prelude and a Legend...the Prelude had a 2 liter engine that put out 135 HP, the Legend had a V6 that put out 165 HP...that same year, IIRC, the BIG V8 (302 CID, 5.0 liter) engine in the Ford put out 160 HP...so, the V8 was 2.5 times as large as my Prelude, yet only 25 HP more...in a tank...and the V8 put out 5 HP LESS than my puny V6 in the Legend...couldn't they see ANYTHING???
|
|
|
Replying to: marsha7 (Jan 05, 2009 7:40 pm) My 1988 Buick Park Avenue has a 165 HP V-6. That doesn't seem too impressive nowadays, but the car is still no slouch and seems to have a lot of pep. |
|
My criticism was that the Ford V8 only put out 160 HP that year, IIRC...their ads bragged about "V8 power" when it was sickeningly anemic...
|
|
|
|
|
Replying to: marsha7 (Jan 06, 2009 3:58 pm)
|
|
Of course you are right, HP isn't everything...but the torque of the V8 was probably as anemic as the HP...certainly not like some diesel, with 175 HP but 400 ft lb of tork, eh???
|
|
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jan 06, 2009 5:26 pm) |
|
You are here:
Forums
Automotive News & Views Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?
New? Join Now!
Forum Tools
Search Forums
Browse by Vehicle
2010 Cadillac Escalade
2009 Cadillac XLR
2010 Cadillac STS
Browse by Board
Browse by Topic
Today's Chats
