Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 544 of 611
1
...
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
...
611
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#5427 of 6098
Re: My sincere apologies [cooterbfd] by circlew
Sep 10, 2008 (4:58 pm)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Sep 10, 2008 1:47 pm)

Yes, better costs more...I GET IT!
 
Regards,
OW
#5428 of 6098
by m4d_cow
Sep 10, 2008 (11:23 pm)
Reply
Here we go again....
CTS vs. 3series, the ultimate comparison, again???? Yeah it just never ends.
 
For those who complain about Cadillac being inferior to BMW, or vice versa, its a matter of personal taste!!!!
Fact is noone, even those with brief test drives, can deny the fact that the BMW's steering is far more communicative.
 
"Why you continue to bring up the CTS' "shortcomings" as compared to your 3 series just because they are the same price is beyond me.
The CTS is as big as the 5 series, yet is $12K cheaper, while your Bimmer is 1/2 inch SHORTER than a Corolla.
Your car SHOULD handle better; it's SMALLER!!! "

 
Heres the problem: Cadillac position the CTS to COMPETE WITH BMW 3-SERIES, NOT 5!!!!! I understand, logically the CTS doesnt belong in the compact luxo car, but thats exactly how Cadillac place the CTS. What can we say??? Cadillac made the choice, customers like us just react accordingly.
Please remember GM brags that CTS' handling is on equal footing with bmw's 3series. But when compared what happens? The CTS fell apart. On the other hand, the CTS does have softer, plush ride that's more comfortable than BMW's. Now if you still have doubts, think about this: the Infiniti G35 is ALMOST AS LARGE as CTS, also positioned to challenge the 3, yet the handling nearly matches BMW's. Does the Cadi come anywhere close? I'd say no. If anyone argue that CTS should be compared to the 5er, then why is the G capable of matching the smaller BMW? Infiniti nailed the target, Cadillac failed. No excuses....
Here's my take on the 3 cars (yes, I have test driven all 3):
1) Performance/handling: BMW tops, G35 very close 2nd, CTS trails. The CTS steering is slow to react when compared to the other 2. However I admit the gap is narrowed significantly now.
2) Ride comfort: Cadillac is best, BMW a bit distant 2nd, G35 worst by far. While the soft suspension isnt necessarily good for agressive driving, I love the CTS' ride on long trips (I did rent one for a 300 mile trip for 3 days)
3) Standard features: Infiniti tops, Cadillac 2nd, BMW worst by a million years. BMWs come stripped down in base form, its a pity that Cadillac lean towards BMW than Infiniti-Acura-Lexus, choosing to make many features optional. GM charge extra cost for paints? None of the japanese charge that, and no, not even BMW should get away with that.
4) Interior quality: BMW still best (though barely), CTS a very very close 2nd, G35 trails. I still think there's too much cheap plastic inside the CTS at this price, frankly I wont complain at all if GM charges CTS at Infiniti price. That said, bmw, while victorious in comparison, still feel rather cheap for the price.
5) Pricing: Infiniti kills all the others, CTS trails, BMW trails even more. A nicely loaded G35 cost about 36k, an equally equipped CTS will cost 4-5k more, and an equivalent 335 will burn your wallet for 44k.
-I admit I'm not familiar with CTS' reliability, so I'm skipping that part to be fair.
And before any of you ask, yes I like BMWs, used to own one, but I'm not defending BMW. I actually find Infiniti the best deal of the 3 at the moment. Now how do you decide which is best? You cant. Each has his/her own preference, making the term "best/better" just as subjective as it can be.
One more thing, can we stop calling names?? Its kinda immature you know? .... thanks, and peace, guys.
#5429 of 6098
Re: [m4d_cow] by circlew
Sep 11, 2008 (3:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: m4d_cow (Sep 10, 2008 11:23 pm)

Your post is excellent. I wish everyone the best of luck no matter what car they choose.
 
Regards,
OW
#5430 of 6098
Re: [m4d_cow] by 62vetteefp
Sep 11, 2008 (8:19 am)
Reply

Replying to: m4d_cow (Sep 10, 2008 11:23 pm)

GM charge extra cost for paints? None of the japanese charge that, and no, not even BMW should get away with that.
 
Cadillac only charges extra for specialty paint. They have to go thru the paint cycle 1 or 2 more times depending on whether it is tintcoat or tricoat so it cost a bit more. It also requires more paint line capacity. The paint is a bunch more expensive too. I see they charge $995. And now they are offering a Chromaflair color.
 
5 years ago Lexus did charge for the tint coats and tricoats but in looking at their website they no longer do.
 
BMW 3 charges $550 just for metallic which is no cost at Cadillac and Lexus. But they do not charge on the 5 or 7. They do not offer a tricoat or tintcoat.
 
I see a lot of tricoat whites and red tint coats on GM high line vehicles so they are making a good profit on a desirable feature. Neighbor just picked up a white tricoat Enclave. Was driving a Lucerne with the same color.
#5431 of 6098
Re: [m4d_cow] by sls002
Sep 11, 2008 (9:41 am)
Reply

Replying to: m4d_cow (Sep 10, 2008 11:23 pm)

Road & Track compared the G35 and new CTS. While they rated the CTS 2nd, it was only 5 points out of 400 less than the G35, not much difference. My impression of what they were saying was that the CTS's ride was nicer than the G35, but that the G35's handling was better. Two slightly different cars. They also had a side-bar comparision with the 535, which was a good $15,000 more expensive. The 535 was far better than either the G35 or CTS as it should be for more than $60,000. The CTS's price tag was nearly $20,000 less.
 
So I don't think that the CTS's handling "fell apart" as you stated. What I think is true is that all of the "sports sedans" have tire/suspension tuning that is different and there are trade-offs that will make one better than another in certain comparisions. Better handling will ususally mean a rougher ride, but on real road conditions which is best is probably not black and white. Road & Track seemed to feel that the CTS would be a much better car for a long trip, while the G35 was probably better for zipping through switchbacks.
#5432 of 6098
Re: [sls002] by circlew
Sep 11, 2008 (10:31 am)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Sep 11, 2008 9:41 am)

Your post is perfect. That is why Cadillac is not the standard for much other than straight line cruising. For that type of ride, why spend the money on the Caddy? A Lexus ES is perfect for that as is an Avalon.
 
Regards,
OW
#5433 of 6098
Re: [circlew] by nortsr1
Sep 11, 2008 (11:28 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Sep 11, 2008 10:31 am)

I will give you credit OW...you never give up for a rebuttal!!! People buy a Cadillac because they want a Cadillac. People buy a Lexus because they want a Lexus.People buy a Toyota becuse they want a Toyota. People spend their money the way they want to!!!!!!!
#5434 of 6098
Re: [circlew] by sls002
Sep 11, 2008 (12:54 pm)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Sep 11, 2008 10:31 am)

I own an SRX. Car & Driver has rated it number 1 since it went into production in 2004 until this year when it was #2. However, the consensus in the last comparison test was that most of the editors would still pick the SRX over the so called winner. So is the SRX really #2 or is it #1 because it was #1 4 out of 5 years?
 
I think with respect to the Road & Track comparison test that you are completely misinterpreting what Road & Track said (and I doubt that you have bothered to read the magazine anyway).
 
Since you seem to value performace above all, why did you not buy something better than the 3-series? The 1-series surely outperforms it!
#5435 of 6098
Re: [sls002] by 62vetteefp
Sep 11, 2008 (1:06 pm)
Reply

Replying to: sls002 (Sep 11, 2008 12:54 pm)

So is the SRX really #2 or is it #1 because it was #1 4 out of 5 years
 
WOW, does that mean the SRX outhandles the CTS and 3 series? I mean it must for C&D to rate it above them. Or was the 3 series rated #1.
#5436 of 6098
Re: [62vetteefp] by sls002
Sep 11, 2008 (1:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Sep 11, 2008 1:06 pm)

In 5-6 inches of snow, yes. In the 2008 comparison the Acura was #1. The BMW X5 was determined to be not in the running and so did not even make it to the comparison. I think at least half a dozen vehicles were in the comparison each year.
 
Car & Driver did not get the 20 inch sport package that I have either.

Messages Page 544 of 611
1
...
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
...
611
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement