- #4998 of 6098
-
Re: Well... [lemko]
by circlew
-
Jul 14, 2008 (9:06 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: lemko (Jul 14, 2008 8:47 am)
JK...teasing you...my dad bought 2 of them. He was upstanding like you.
Regards,
OW
|
- #4999 of 6098
-
Re: Well... [circlew]
by sls002
-
Jul 14, 2008 (6:44 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: circlew (Jul 14, 2008 8:01 am)
Your link is for a 2003 CTS, not the 2006, and the price tag is $17000, not $15,000. So what exactly is your point?
|
- #5000 of 6098
-
Re: Well... [sls002]
by 62vetteefp
-
Jul 15, 2008 (2:27 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Jul 14, 2008 6:44 pm)
Your link is for a 2003 CTS, not the 2006, and the price tag is $17000, not $15,000. So what exactly is your point?
Misinformation to make his point that he hates GM and to convinc all others of the same. You can say anything on the net. Remember he said that he lives in his own reality
|
- #5001 of 6098
-
Re: Well... [62vetteefp]
by sls002
-
Jul 15, 2008 (5:25 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jul 15, 2008 2:27 am)
Well, I think his earlier posts suggested Cadillac's depreciate faster than Mercedes. I think that is probably true, but Mercedes does depreciate too. My premise is that one can look at all of the listed cars of interest on cars.com to see a range of prices for a particular model/year. One could look at the C-class listings for model year 2008 (about 160) and the CTS (over 500), then look at the median price tag (the cars in the middle of each list) and compare that with the 2005 models (about 1500 each).
|
- #5002 of 6098
-
Re: Well... [sls002]
by 62vetteefp
-
Jul 15, 2008 (6:03 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Jul 15, 2008 5:25 am)
Why guess by looking at a random collection of vehicles when you can get data from the source that does it scientifically?
https://www.alg.com/deprratings.aspx?sid=43
CTS has same rating as most Mercedes.
|
- #5003 of 6098
-
Re: Well... [62vetteefp]
by fintail
-
Jul 15, 2008 (6:34 am)
-
|
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jul 15, 2008 6:03 am)
How about over different periods? I think most people keep their car for more than 2 years...I see stars, no numbers.
|
- #5004 of 6098
-
Re: Well... [sls002]
by circlew
-
Jul 15, 2008 (2:09 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Jul 14, 2008 6:44 pm)
OOPS! My mistake.
Regards,
OW
|
- #5005 of 6098
-
Re: Well... [62vetteefp]
by circlew
-
Jul 15, 2008 (2:11 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jul 15, 2008 2:27 am)
Yes, I made a mistake. I do not need to convince anyone regarding GM. I don't hate anyone or thing. Just think way better choices out there.
Regards,
OW
|
- #5006 of 6098
-
Re: Well... [sls002]
by circlew
-
Jul 15, 2008 (4:01 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: sls002 (Jul 15, 2008 5:25 am)
Here is another link but I was aware this time and checked. 65 2006 CTS are listed for $16K.
This one has 38,564 miles and looks in great shape.
link title
Regards,
OW
|
- #5007 of 6098
-
Re: Well... [circlew]
by sls002
-
Jul 15, 2008 (4:24 pm)
-
|
|
Replying to: circlew (Jul 15, 2008 4:01 pm)
Proves nothing. However here is a C-class priced at $11,000
|