Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 470 of 610
1
...
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4690 of 6098
Re: You got it backwards... [bumpy] by pmc4
Mar 01, 2008 (7:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bumpy (Mar 01, 2008 3:20 pm)

Bumpy. To "drive luxuriously" meant the same thing in the 1980's as it does today. The only difference is we have technology on our side today.
 
What does it mean for a car to "drive luxuriously?" Obviously during the 80's, that meant that the car had to have very low interior noise levels. It also meant NVH had to be attenuated as much as possible. It also meant that the car had to run over rough road surfaces with the least amount of the road's texture coming in.
 
Unlike cars from the 80's, today's luxury cars in addition to the qualities just listed now have well-weighted steering (electronic sensors/steering racks). Brakes that grab and act in a linear fashion (electronic sensors for traction control). Enough of the road surface has to be transmitted thru the steering rack to provide the driver with feedback so as to inspire driving confidence. The seats have to be extremely comfortable to prevent driver fatigue (applied materials; biometrics research). A well-tuned chassis (careful tuning on road courses/Nurburgring).
In addition, there will be all kinds of standard features that were not available back in the 80's.
 
Since the Mercedes Benz you posted fits none of the criteria I set fourth above (for example, the car has high levels of interior noise. The ride is Bumpy (sorry...). The engine in the car vibrates all the fizz out of your Coke while you're driving it. The transmission in the car gives you a swift kick in the pants each time you accelerate it. The soundproofing (or lack thereof) makes the interior sound like you're standing in a wind tunnel at speeds over like 30 MPH. A prerequisite to using the steering wheel is that you can hammer curl at least 40 lbs.
The interior has first-class luxury appointments like a huge, red hazard lamp sticking out of the center console. The speedometer and tachometer have a documented 4,980,352 digits printed on them. The leather surfaces has all the softness and suppleness of an NFL football. The plastic surfaces have all the elegance and class of an NFL football helmet. Chrome is used as if it were a precious metal. ets, etc, etc.), it is not a luxury car. Since it goes from 0 to 60 in around 9 seconds, it is not a sports car. Since it's noisy as well as slow, it is not a luxury sport sedan. It has a tight turning radius, so it could technically be called an econo-box.
 
But it cost like $50,000...
 
Which begs the question, "What on God's Green Earth is it?!"
#4692 of 6098
Re: You got it backwards... [bumpy] by fintail
Mar 01, 2008 (8:07 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bumpy (Mar 01, 2008 3:20 pm)

Mmmm...that looks to be tectite grey like my E55. Very unusual. Would have been like 50K in 1988...and nearly everyone who bought it was very pleased.
#4693 of 6098
Re: You got it backwards... [pmc4] by fintail
Mar 01, 2008 (8:10 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pmc4 (Mar 01, 2008 7:23 pm)

The car he posted has the M103 inline 6, a relatively powerful and very durable 3 litre engine with turbine-like smoothness. You won't have any vibrations from it. Please, you have apparently never even ridden in one of these cars.
 
Chrome and bordello interiors are American definitions of luxury. Americans do not own the concept.
 
And about your performance talk, I have no doubt it could school one of those baby Eldos on a track...
#4694 of 6098
Meanwhile, back in 2008... by claires HOST
Mar 01, 2008 (9:32 pm)
Reply
can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world?
#4695 of 6098
Re: You got it backwards... [pmc4] by bumpy
Mar 01, 2008 (10:08 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pmc4 (Mar 01, 2008 7:23 pm)

Which begs the question, "What on God's Green Earth is it?!"
 
"It" started life as a 300CE, then AMG turned it into a 6L V8 monster with an equally fearsome price tag: $160,000 or thereabouts. The somnabulent set was not invited to participate.
#4696 of 6098
Re: Meanwhile, back in 2008... [claires] by bumpy
Mar 01, 2008 (10:13 pm)
Reply

Replying to: claires (Mar 01, 2008 9:32 pm)

Short answer: no. GM has decided that the CTS should be a 300C with a better interior; the SRX, STS, and DTS are slated to die at the end of the decade, and the replacement for the latter two will be a rebodied Holden sedan; the Escalade will continue to to be a gadgetologized Tahoe (to borrow a Rockyism); and the XLR will continue to be an overpriced angular body on a Corvette platform. Nice enough if you like that sort of thing, but the Hyundai Genesis has as much a claim on "Standard of the World" as anything Cadillac has in the fold.
#4697 of 6098
Re: Meanwhile, back in 2008... [claires] by circlew
Mar 02, 2008 (6:25 am)
Reply

Replying to: claires (Mar 01, 2008 9:32 pm)

No.
 
Regards,
OW
#4698 of 6098
Re: Meanwhile, back in 2008... [claires] by fintail
Mar 02, 2008 (9:29 am)
Reply

Replying to: claires (Mar 01, 2008 9:32 pm)

Seeing as the "standard" had to do with standardized parts more than any kind of "luxury standard" , no...as even British cars today have standardized parts.
 
Caddy is for all intents and purposes a North American brand. It has gone over like a lead balloon in Europe, and I don't see this changing. It really isn't anything "of the world", and it doesn't have to be.
#4699 of 6098
Re: Meanwhile, back in 2008... [claires] by laurasdada
Mar 02, 2008 (9:42 am)
Reply

Replying to: claires (Mar 01, 2008 9:32 pm)

Who would even make that determination? The whole "Standard" title has been documented here. I suppose if they were again awarded the Dewar Trophy for their world leading build "standards," then Caddy could lay claim to that title given that criteria.
 
And, does it matter? Will every car built by every mfg. conform to the needs, wants and desires of every buyer? My guess is that as long as there are three people on earth, there will be at least two different opinions on almost any given subject. Especially cars!
 
I personally don't care about brands and labels (much... ). I use the auto rags and internet to help me narrow a list of cars down to those most likely to fit my bill. But, since Edmunds, CR, C & D, R & T et. al. aren't paying for my car, I make the decision on what is my "standard." Right now the single best car in the world resides in my side of the garage. The Evil Wife has her "standard of the world" on her side of the garage...
 
For many, many years GM built cars that appealed less and less to their former, and future, constituency. In fact, for years Caddy's weren't Caddy's. Just rebadged all other GM brands, e.g. Cimarron. But the past is just that. Including Dewar Trophies, Cimarron's, Allantes, Humped back Sevilles and V8/6/4 engines. It appears that years and years of wait 'till next year are now becoming next year. The CTS is good, the SRX isn't horrible, the STS isn't horrible, even the XLR isn't bad. WHere Caddy has stumbled a bit imho is with pricing. Without the discounts/rebates, Caddy's are competitive cars at non-competitive prices.
 
Saw a black '08 CTS the other day with full faux tan convertible top and much gold special edition badges. Those that don't learn from the past are destined to repeat it...

Messages Page 470 of 610
1
...
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement