Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 463 of 610
1
...
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4618 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [xrunner2] by cooterbfd
Feb 27, 2008 (9:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: xrunner2 (Feb 27, 2008 3:54 am)

Maybe we are really talking about the desire and capability of GM to return Cadillac to its former glory status and how close is it now in achieving that goal. But, some will say, what is "glory". Do we even know if GM has set goal to make Cadillac the top luxury car of the world? Have Wagoner or Lutz stated so or is it mentioned in GM annual report to shareholders? If they have set that goal, how will they know when they have met it?
      
Great point!!! Is it possible, with the advent of the Japanese luxury marks over the last 20 yrs, trying to emulate BOTH Cadillac AND the Germans, only with cust. svc. and Quality in mind, that what has happened is that Caddy has tried to remain true to it's recent history as being that luxury car (the "sofa"on wheels) that Americans aspired to own as they chased the American dream. Yet quality issues, not styling have nagged them.
 
The Germans on the other hand, have that import "prestige" on their side and have masked their quality issues by building a "supercar" image with gadgets and V-10's and V-12's and such.
 
Even early on, the Japanese made thinly veiled "gussied up" versions of their more popular sedans into Luxury Marques, but the quality and reliability is what allowed them to gain a foothold.
 
couple this with the fact that people come out of college EXPECTING the American Dream to be there waiting for it, there is nothing left for them to "aspire" to.
 
Caddy's Northstar V-8 has been around now for almost 15 years. It is one of the better V-8's on the market still. But, no V-12 bling, sticks that are few and far in between, and quality and reliability on par with the Germans, but (questionable now) historically behind the Japs.
 
They are criticized for not being as sporty as the Germans (not meant to be), but not as reliable as the Japs (point well taken, but now in SOME question), so that kind of puts them in no man's land in the luxury arena.
 
What they SHOULD do w/ the CTS is pound it into the public's head that it is BIGGER and LESS EXPENSIVE than the 5 or E!!! Screw the magazines that compare it to the 3 and C!!! They may not get people looking for a 5 or E to buy into that, though they may, but they WILL get it into their heads that it is MORE CAR for the SAME PRICE as the 3,C,IS,A-4, etc.
 
Caddy may NEVER have been as good as it was looked at in the '50's or '60's, but it sure as hell was never as bad as people said in the '70's or '80's.
#4619 of 6098
Re: Rolls the Standard? [bumpy] by lemko
Feb 27, 2008 (9:47 am)
Reply

Replying to: bumpy (Feb 27, 2008 9:00 am)

The non-V CTS already has a 2.8 V-6 or a 3.6 V-6, neither of which is a pushrod engine, though I'd really like the idea of an LT-1 350 V-8 in the the little CTS!!!
#4620 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [cooterbfd] by lemko
Feb 27, 2008 (4:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: cooterbfd (Feb 27, 2008 9:23 am)

Geeze, the CTS already wipes up the floor with the 3-Series and C-Class, both of which are overpriced yuppie poseurmobiles. You're getting a 5-Series for the price of a 3 with the CTS.
#4621 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [lemko] by cooterbfd
Feb 27, 2008 (9:58 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Feb 27, 2008 4:52 am)

Absoluely!! Just pound that into the public's head and then you may get people looking for a 3 buy the CTS. You MAY get some frugal people to buy the CTS instead of a 5 or E, but I think the latter is more of a stretch than the former.
#4622 of 6098
Re: Rolls the Standard? [lemko] by xhe518
Feb 27, 2008 (10:02 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Feb 27, 2008 9:47 am)

though I'd really like the idea of an LT-1 350 V-8 in the the little CTS!!!
 
The CTS-V has basically the Corvette ZR-1 engine, detuned to "only" 550 hp !
#4623 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [lemko] by circlew
Feb 27, 2008 (11:00 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Feb 27, 2008 4:52 am)

Her is some interesteing data from July 2007.
 
According to the industry examiners at CNW Research, Cadillac’s fortunes appear to be slipping away at the margins.
 
In the firm’s July installment of their Retail Automotive Summary, their Aspirational Index (which judges a brand’s attractiveness to consumers) reveals that Cadillac’s rising star is beginning to falter. In the mid-Nineties, the marque rated only a 4 on a 10 point scale. With the brand’s dramatic rebound beginning in 1999, its score climbed for five straight years, flattening out in 2005 and 2006. It has now slipped under 8.0, the brand’s lowest mark since 2003.
 
The ‘aspiration age’ for Cadillac buyers has also swelled from 30.3 just three years ago to 35.9. Interestingly, Cadillac trucks (read: the Escalade brand) went from 25.7 to 32.7—a 27 percent increase. This suggests that Cadillac’s appeal among buyers in that most coveted of demographics (18-35 years old) is slipping.
 
Editor’s Note: Cadillac’s disappointing trending seems like a fairly predictable result of its aging bread-and-butter product line (think: CTS, SRX, XLR, and STS). Older consumers seem to be less concerned with purchasing new models than they are with other factors (witness the devoted elderly audiences of such long-running cars as Cadillac’s own DeVille, or Ford’s Crown Victoria). We anticipate an uptick in Cadillac’s scores once the 2008 CTS filters into dealerships.

 
Regards,
OW
#4624 of 6098
Re: Rolls the Standard? [lemko] by bumpy
Feb 27, 2008 (11:48 am)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Feb 27, 2008 9:47 am)

I think the new CTS still has the 2.8 in Europe, but over here it's either the standard or direct-injection 3.6L. If Cadillac does get a sub-CTS car, I'd imagine they would drop the base 3.6L to open up some pricing room for that, and add a 375-400ish V8 to push the CTS up into E/5er/Genesis territory.
#4625 of 6098
Re: Rolls the Standard? [bumpy] by xhe518
Feb 27, 2008 (11:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: bumpy (Feb 27, 2008 11:48 am)

I think the new CTS still has the 2.8 in Europe, but over here it's either the standard or direct-injection 3.6L. If Cadillac does get a sub-CTS car, I'd imagine they would drop the base 3.6L to open up some pricing room for that, and add a 375-400ish V8 to push the CTS up into E/5er/Genesis territory.
 
I'm not sure about Europe, but here in the US, the CTS has two 3.6L engines - the base one makes about 255hp, the direct injection one makes 300hp. There is definitely plenty of room between the 300hp CTS and the 550hp CTS-V for a V8 option.... But in this new era of $3.50 gas, 35mpg CAFE, etc.. I don't know.... They will definitely have a turbo-diesel for the CTS soon - I think it's already on sale in Europe.
#4626 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [lemko] by jimbres
Feb 27, 2008 (1:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Feb 27, 2008 4:52 am)

Geeze, the CTS already wipes up the floor with the 3-Series and C-Class, both of which are overpriced yuppie poseurmobiles.
 
Easy there, big fella. While the new CTS is clearly the best Cadillac in 40 years (please don't pretend that any of the 80s Caddies were anything more than pathetic), it leaves something to be desired for us stick aficionados. Every review of the MT version of the CTS that I've read pans the stick. I don't doubt that the automatic can hold its own against the foreign competition, but as long as my knees hold out, I have no interest in a car with fewer than 3 pedals.
 
I'm at least 2 years away from replacing my 330i. If Cadillac can work the kinks out of the manual tranny by the time I'm ready to buy, then the CTS will be a serious contender. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect the same level of gear-shifting satisfaction from the 2010 CTS that I'm used to from my 2001 330i.
#4627 of 6098
Re: Longer? [bumpy] by pmc4
Feb 27, 2008 (2:24 pm)
Reply

Replying to: bumpy (Feb 26, 2008 7:45 pm)

"Fake burled walnut is deserving of every bit of hate that can be heaped upon it. I can print out a picture of a board and tape that to the dashboard of my car and it would look better."
 
Weren't you the poster who agreed with Consumer Reports when Consumer Reports remarked how elegant and real the fake wood in the 2007 Toyota Avalon looked? What, then, makes the fake wood in the early 80's Cadillacs any different (late 80's Caddys and beyond went with real wood trim)? Could it be that the Cadillac is a domestic car and the Toyota is an import? And if that's the case, what difference does origin of manufacture matter when fake or real wood trim is discussed?

Messages Page 463 of 610
1
...
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics
Advertisement