Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 462 of 611
1
...
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
...
611
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4606 of 6098
Re: Longer? [pmc4] by bumpy
Feb 26, 2008 (7:45 pm)
Reply

Replying to: pmc4 (Feb 26, 2008 3:57 pm)

Fake burled walnut is deserving of every bit of hate that can be heaped upon it. I can print out a picture of a board and tape that to the dashboard of my car and it would look better.
#4607 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [circlew] by claires HOST
Feb 26, 2008 (7:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Feb 26, 2008 12:32 pm)

My guess is there is no company that has achieved this exclusively on a broad luxury basis, let alone Caddy. In my mind, they never were the standard anyway.
 
I think the original post was concerned with general perception of luxury, performance and service that Cadillac once enjoyed. There was a time when Cadillac was generally viewed as the best of the best. Being seen at the wheel of a Cadillac meant that you'd finally made your mark in the world. The phrase "this is the Cadillac of (TVs, refrigerators, stereo systems, whatever)" needed no explanation -- it was understood to mean "this is the BEST there is, ever, anywhere."
 
Whether or not the perception was consistent with reality is beside the point. So is the discussion of 80's models. The point of this discussion (as I understand it) is whether GM is able to anticipate and meet the evolving needs of the driving public to return Cadillac to its former glory status.
#4608 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [claires] by 62vetteefp
Feb 27, 2008 (4:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: claires (Feb 26, 2008 7:51 pm)

The phrase "this is the Cadillac of (TVs,
Interesting. We still hear this phrase in advertising of the past that is used today. Look in the yellow pages and around. However I doubt you will see new ad campaigns using it and surely those under 40-50 would not think "Cadillac of ..." automatically when looking at something. Then again they would not think the "BMW of, or Merdedes of. However I believe I have heard "the Lexus of". Perhaps not in advertising but in comments.
 
Anyway if we look at what is out today the CTS and SRX are both considered right up there with the BMW and MB and Lexus. They may not be above them that "the Cadillac of" can be used but those who can get beyond their prejudice of domestic makers they would see that the CTS is worthy of it's place in the upper luxurydom. Pretty much most of the media has placed it up there. The SRX also is placed highly.
 
Is Cadillac so much higher than the others that "the Cadillac" could be used?? No way. In fact back in the 60's when this term was widely used those other marques just were not seen as much. Just not many around and Cadillac was at the top. Today it would be very tough to stand out among all these high end marques and no one does in every area.
#4609 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [62vetteefp] by circlew
Feb 27, 2008 (5:15 am)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Feb 27, 2008 4:45 am)

Correct assessment. Looking out from the US auro market between the '60's and today, the world got awfully smaller. Now the Lexuses, BMW's and Mercedes of the world have overtaken any perceived notion of Caddy being the luxury standard.
What about Rolls?? Bentley? Now that's what I'm talkin' about!
 
Caddy as World Standard? Never to be seen again (if it ever really was). The Mark of Excellence is not used anymore for a good reason. Because it's not true.
 
BTW, I or my family have owed cars produced by the now infamous Big 3 for over 55 years. I just got tired of waiting and hoping. Now that the GM allowed the CTS to get interesting, I am waiting to see if they mess it up.
 
Regards,
OW.
#4610 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [circlew] by 62vetteefp
Feb 27, 2008 (6:52 am)
Reply

Replying to: circlew (Feb 27, 2008 5:15 am)

The standard of the world has been discussed here adnauseum.
 
Is it the most ostentatious? elegant? technical? highest priced? best price for the money? greenest? best quality? highest reliability?
 
It is not any of the above and yet may be all of the above.
 
for our purposes here I would say it is the product that when someone on the street sees it says: now that is a great car that I really want to aspire to/ have. It is what everyone says is the best of the best. Right now because this world is so flat I do not believe there is one marque out there that is the top dog.
 
But for this discussion I believe we should look for say the top 2 or 3 that meets my definition. Rolls and Bentley I would say they meet the above definition but are so much more expensive relative to others that they knock themselves out of the running. When Cadillac was the "standard of the world" (the world being the US at that time) the other marquees were not that far behind them in price. Sure the caddy was expensive but it was not 5 times the price of the normal car being sold.
 
So per my thoughts the BMW's, MB's, Audis, Lexi, Caddys are the ones that can compete for this "standard". I guess I would think that most would say MB is the standard compared to the rest. Sure it is not a performance car like the BMW but in my opinion if a high priced BMW is sitting next to a high priced MB I would say the MB has more prestige. Am I right here?
 
At this time Cadillac does not have models to compete with the high end. At the low end (3, CTS) Caddy is very well represented. Time will tell if the newer models make the same inroads.
 
And please do not start a thread on how CTS has a cheap interior or whatever. It is recognized by the media as being right up there with the best of them.
#4611 of 6098
Rolls the Standard? by lemko
Feb 27, 2008 (7:42 am)
Reply
I'm not sure about that either. The fastest way to commit fiscal suicide is to buy a 1980s Rolls!
 
I really don't want Cadillac to chase Lexus, BMW, and Mercedes too much. It is at the sweet spot for me as far as affordability. I'd have to defect to Buick if Caddy goes too high end. If Buick goes away, I have nowhere to go. Chrysler? Nah, the 300 is getting too long in the tooth. Lincoln? Feh! Nothing there anymore.
#4612 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [62vetteefp] by circlew
Feb 27, 2008 (7:44 am)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Feb 27, 2008 6:52 am)

And please do not start a thread on how CTS has a cheap interior or whatever. It is recognized by the media as being right up there with the best of them.
 
Not a problem and I agree. Your point is well taken.
 
The reality in my view is that visibly, edgy doesn't do it for me but inside, it is very nice inside. Previous to 2008, no Caddy was appealing at all to me. Therefore, I would not have cause to have the marque on my comparo list. 'Doesn't do anything great for me' also comes to mind as I review Caddy products.
 
Since the topic is Caddy's potential to be the standard, no current model says they are going to claim that any time soon.
 
Regards,
OW
#4613 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [62vetteefp] by sls002
Feb 27, 2008 (2:45 am)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Feb 27, 2008 6:52 am)

When Cadillac won the "standard of the world" trophy, it was a mid-priced car, much like Buick is today. If you are talking about Cadillac after World War Two, then Cadillac was priced in the luxury class for the US market, but compared with Lincoln and Imperial. Packard was doomed. Cadillac became a high end model after GM took it over, but Cadillac's high end was during the thirties when the V16 was in production.
 
I think Cadillac made an attempt to get into the true high end luxury market with the Eldorado Brougham in the late fifties, but this model was more glitz than anything and was a maintenance pig.
 
I would agree with you on BMW (mostly sports sedans) vs Mercedes (wide range of luxury/sport_sedan models). For prestige the Rolls is it, but is way out of range for nearly everyone. Mercedes is prestigious, and one can buy a C-class for a reasonable price (which may not be quite as much prestige as an S-class, but still is a Mercedes).
 
I have yet to see a new CTS. I did take my SRX back recently for the axle seal recall, but the showroom only had Corvette's, Impala's and SUV's to look at. But I do think the CTS with the new interior and re-sized body may replace the DTS as the popularly priced Cadillac.
#4614 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [62vetteefp] by steve_ HOST
Feb 27, 2008 (3:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Feb 27, 2008 4:45 am)

However I believe I have heard "the Lexus of". Perhaps not in advertising but in comments. Nothing like this one.
 
Interesting to note that the Is Lexus The Standard of the World? discussion doesn't get too many comments.
 
I don't hear comments like the Rolex of can openers or the Mont Blanc of down pillows. Cadillac still seems to own the phrase - people just don't seem to make comparisons like that as much anymore.
 
Maybe because Timexes keep time as well as a Rolex with a lot less maintenance and expense, and Bics write better than most Mont Blancs?
#4615 of 6098
Re: The Only Luxury Car... [claires] by xrunner2
Feb 27, 2008 (3:54 am)
Reply

Replying to: claires (Feb 26, 2008 7:51 pm)

The point of this discussion (as I understand it) is whether GM is able to anticipate and meet the evolving needs of the driving public to return Cadillac to its former glory status.
 
Nicely put. Seems like many of we posters get all hung up about the word "standard". According to some folks, the "standard" term was used with regard to some race sponsored by Dewars that Cadillac had won. If "standard" of luxury/performance had actually been awarded to a car mfr on annual basis over years by some group such as WSJ, NY Times, Motor Trend, CR, Car and Driver, Road and Track, etc, then maybe it might be useful to use that term. But, that has not been the case.
 
Maybe we are really talking about the desire and capability of GM to return Cadillac to its former glory status and how close is it now in achieving that goal. But, some will say, what is "glory". Do we even know if GM has set goal to make Cadillac the top luxury car of the world? Have Wagoner or Lutz stated so or is it mentioned in GM annual report to shareholders? If they have set that goal, how will they know when they have met it?

Messages Page 462 of 611
1
...
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
...
611
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement