Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 434 of 610
1
...
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4329 of 6098
Re: CTS discussion Car of the Year candidate [imidazol97] by lykourinou
Jan 09, 2008 (10:14 am)
Reply

Replying to: imidazol97 (Jan 09, 2008 8:54 am)

thanks for thelink
#4330 of 6098
Re: Ultra V8 axed [bumpy] by mr215
Jan 09, 2008 (10:32 am)
Reply

Replying to: bumpy (Jan 09, 2008 8:42 am)

I havent been in an escalade at idle but in other cars I can say idle is quiet and smooth. In any test where db ratings are provided you can compare noise levels between DOHC and OHV motors and the difference is minimal, if it exists at all.
#4331 of 6098
Re: Ultra V8 axed [louiswei] by mr215
Jan 09, 2008 (10:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: louiswei (Jan 09, 2008 9:02 am)

LOL, it was only a matter of time before the old hp/L argument surfaced. Its a meaningless stat, especially when comparing OHV engines to DOHC engines. An OHV engine needs more displacement to make comparable power because its 2 valves/cylinder. There is no way around that at all. Thats like saying a turbo engine makes more hp/L than a NA engine and is automatically superior. NA engines need more displacement because they cant get as much air into the cylinder as a FI engine. The bottom line is this: the Escalade doesnt suffer in any way by having an OHV engine. Its just as fast as the competition and gets comparable mileage. In the end that's all that matters. The driver of the Escalade probably cant tell you what type of engine is under the hood. Specific output is only important to people who are fans of Honda engines and want to brag about how much power can be squeezed out of a small motor. BTW, .5L isnt that small when tallking about V8 engines. OHV engines have come a long way. The 3800 V6 makes about 200hp while 3.5L V6s from Toyota and Honda make 268. thats a much larger difference than exists between the Toyota V8 and the GM 6.2L V8.
#4332 of 6098
Re: price ?? Re: CTS-v 09 [louiswei] by mr215
Jan 09, 2008 (10:43 am)
Reply

Replying to: louiswei (Jan 09, 2008 8:49 am)

"I can go on and on and on you know. "
 
I'm talking comparable cars. Dont think the Boxter is comparable to the CTS-V or IS-F. Simple point was that for $60k the CTS-V will offer more bang for your buck. I'm sure you will disagree since it seems you arent a fan of Cadillac at all.
 
I dont find it surprising that you dont like Fi engines since Cadillac is using one. MB and BMW also use FI engines but I'm sure that doesnt make a difference.
#4333 of 6098
Re: price ?? Re: CTS-v 09 [mr215] by louiswei
Jan 09, 2008 (10:55 am)
Reply

Replying to: mr215 (Jan 09, 2008 10:43 am)

I'm sure you will disagree since it seems you arent a fan of Cadillac at all.
 
If I have to be a fan to agree with what you've said then you better look back to see if there is any flaw in your statement. A fair statement will get all kind of people to agree with it.
 
I think if the new CTS-V to have MSRP of around $60k it'll be the best value in the ubber sports sedan class. Whether it's the best or not is yet to be seen since so far we have only the engine specs to compare. HP isn't everything, if that's the case, BMW should just pack up and go home with the new M3.
 
You can search through my posts and you'll see I prefer NA over FI from day one that I posted here.
#4335 of 6098
Re: price ?? Re: CTS-v 09 [louiswei] by mr215
Jan 09, 2008 (11:23 am)
Reply

Replying to: louiswei (Jan 09, 2008 10:55 am)

"HP isn't everything, if that's the case, BMW should just pack up and go home with the new M3. "
 
Agreed about the packing up and going home. The CTS_V is a proven entity so the notion that "its fast but we dont know about the handling" is a little hard to swallow for me. This isnt a big block 60s muscle car, its a sports sedan designed to go head to head with the best of Europe. The last car had the handling, power and steering to compete but lacked interior finesse and had problems getting the power to the pavement in hard launches. The new car obviously aimed to address those shortcomings and then some. Unless Cadillac has swapped the CTS' chassis with something from Toyota or Hyundai I don't see how this car cant be considered best in class. The pedigree of the V series cars has been vetted by the press for the last 3+ years so we know what to expect from these cars when the road gets curvy. On another site it was noted that Top Gear got better lap times from the CTS-V than the S4.
 
I say you arent a Cadillac fan since you seem unimpressed with anything they offer and post more about the superiority of foreign brands than about Cadillac's resurgence. My statement had little to do with agreeing with my statements.
#4336 of 6098
Re: price ?? Re: CTS-v 09 [mr215] by louiswei
Jan 09, 2008 (11:39 am)
Reply

Replying to: mr215 (Jan 09, 2008 11:23 am)

To quote your original statement:
 
'Simple point was that for $60k the CTS-V will offer more bang for your buck. I'm sure you will disagree since it seems you arent a fan of Cadillac at all. '
 
So pretty much you were saying that if one is a Cadillac fan then he/she will agree for $60k the CTS-V will offer more bang for the buck. If not then he/she will disagree. However, if the CTS-V is truly and hands down the best bang for the buck at $60k then I think all people will agree regardless of being Caddy fans or not.
 
Okay, let's compare the chassis between the CTS and 5-series, I think the general consensus from all the reviews is that although the CTS handles great, it is not yet a 5-series beater, not to mention the 3-series. So since the CTS-V, M5 and M3 are all built on the base models' chassis what will make me to believe that it'll out handle the Bimmers?
 
Again, HP isn't everything.
 
Also, just to remind you that I don't think the M3 and M5 are packing anything up to go anywhere soon.
#4337 of 6098
Re: 2008 CTS-V [mr215] by sevenfeet0
Jan 09, 2008 (11:53 am)
Reply

Replying to: mr215 (Jan 09, 2008 8:31 am)

The '08 CTS is on the "same platform" but not without a lot of changes in the last five years. You can also glean some of the limitations and changes of this car versus the last that have already popped up in some of the online arcticles, but I've also managed to have several discussions with former GM engine engineer in their performance division who used to drop by my dealership from time to time. You learn a lot from these guys.

Messages Page 434 of 610
1
...
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement