Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 429 of 610
1
...
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4279 of 6098
Re: Can we get back to Cadillac [louiswei] by 62vetteefp
Jan 07, 2008 (11:24 am)
Reply

Replying to: louiswei (Jan 07, 2008 9:41 am)

But according to the JP Power data we can see that even with the new 2008 CTS, Caddy is not attracting many owners under the age of 40.
 
Very true but if we look at Mercedes their average age is 59, 6 years older than Cadillac (53). Heck Rolls is a dead old age of 63 . Lexus is just under Cadillac with 49. Even BMW with their very youthful/sporty/performance high volume 3 series has an average of 46.
 
So it really looks like the major reason that Cadillac and others in the same $ ball park are buyers with an average of close to 50 is due to wealth, and most of the wealth in this country is held by older folks.
 
And if you look at the younger average ages you see that they are all low priced marques. Who woulda thought!!
 
But there is no doubt that if Cadillac wants to attract the same buyers as BMW they have their work cut out for them. CTS is just a start. When they drop the DTS next year most of those buyers will swap over to the STS but many will just keep their DTS untill they can no longer drive. In the short run dropping the DTS should drop Cadillacs average age but in the longer term they need to continue to go after the baby boomers with a different kind of product.
#4283 of 6098
Re: can't read graphs [mr215] by 62vetteefp
Jan 07, 2008 (12:03 pm)
Reply

The 2008 model year just started a few months back so I think we should see where the CTS stands after a full year. I would think it appeals to more younger people than before.
 
One probable reason why CTS is selling to an older crowd relative to it's 2007 version is because the ATP is probably $5000 higher. The 2008 has more content and the ATP is always much higher for any new vehicle at it's new model intro. People pay closer to MSRP, buy more options and get the higher models. Couple years into it's life cycle it goes the other way. SOOO, again the wealthier buy in the first years and that means the older consumer is buying.
#4284 of 6098
Re: Can we get back to Cadillac [62vetteefp] by habitat1
Jan 07, 2008 (12:46 pm)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jan 07, 2008 11:24 am)

Where are you getting the average age data? I'd like to look at some others for the fun of it.
 
I'm actually surprised that the average age of a Rolls owner is only 63. About half of the ones I see are being driven by a chauffer and "Miss Daisy" looks to be in her 80's or 90's. Maybe it's the kids buying the car for mom and writing it off as a medical expense.
#4285 of 6098
Re: Can we get back to Cadillac [habitat1] by 62vetteefp
Jan 07, 2008 (1:26 pm)
Reply

Replying to: habitat1 (Jan 07, 2008 12:46 pm)

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2005-02-16-seniorcars-usat_x.htm
 
Someone earlier on posted it.
#4286 of 6098
Re: Can we get back to Cadillac [lemko] by rockylee
Jan 07, 2008 (11:51 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lemko (Jan 07, 2008 6:14 am)

Well that new Twin-Turbo V6 with 340 hp and 367 tq. sure looks might fine while gaining I think a 30% fuel economy boost. The engine known as Eco-Boost or something like that is posted in the MKS forum. The MKS, like the CTS, is the car to have !!!! Lemko, have you checked the MKS, out pal ? Man that car is Sharp !!!
 
-Rocky
#4287 of 6098
Re: Can we get back to Cadillac [62vetteefp] by habitat1
Jan 08, 2008 (2:46 am)
Reply

Replying to: 62vetteefp (Jan 07, 2008 1:26 pm)

Thanks for the link, but it does raise an interesting question.
 
According to the article:
 
the baby boomers, who will start hitting age 65 in 2011 ..... Eventually, 79 million baby boomers will hit 65.
 
Cadillac has remade itself as a powerful, youthful brand, and its last old-fogy car — the DeVille — is in its final model year. General Motors, which owns Cadillac, dropped the Oldsmobile brand because of its older image and waning sales.

 
GM's Buick, Olds and Cadillac divisions were catering to an older demographic when that segment wasn't very large and younger buyers flocked to other brands and makes. Now that the American popluation is about to enter the most significant "graying of America" period in it's history, Olds has been killed and Caddy is trying to be young and hip.
 
Regardless of my personal preferences in cars, it appears that GM is perenially out of sync. They needed young and hip cars 20 years ago. Today they might actually want models that appeal to the older generation which will be increasing significantly over the next 20+ years. That doesn't mean "stodgy", as the article suggests. But it also doesn't mean ignoring the only demographic segment and loyal customer base that has kept the company out of bankruptcy. It's not the older buyers that are the "enemy" of GM. It was the incompetent employees in the design, engineering, marketing and manufacturing departments that couldn't put together decent cars to appeal to younger buyers in the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's. Now might be exactly the right time to embrace the older buyer.
#4288 of 6098
Re: Can we get back to Cadillac [habitat1] by 62vetteefp
Jan 08, 2008 (5:10 am)
Reply

Replying to: habitat1 (Jan 08, 2008 2:46 am)

it appears that GM is perenially out of sync. They needed young and hip cars 20 years ago. Today they might actually want models that appeal to the older generation which will be increasing significantly over the next 20+ years.
 
I thought the article said it but perhaps it was some other. The baby boomers do not want old people cars. Since I am just about 50 (WOW) I can see that. The cars of yesteryear designed for older folks were well done and did their jobs great. Buicks, Olds and Cadillac did great. But today's soon to be old population does not want that. They do not want to drive old cars. Buick and Cadillac are doing exactly what the older population coming up wants. The Cadillacs are more performance oriented and hip. Buicks are becoming more stylish and premium lux, including the ride. I see nowhere where GM has thrown away the older market. If anything they continue to get it, as evidenced by our previous threads.
 
Now if you feel Caddy and Buick are taking the wrong direction I wonder who you think the boomers will be buying into? Lexus? Well they are as close to Buick in so many ways that Buick will be there for them. Mercedes/BMW? Again Cadillac is right there with their new products coming out. Both divisions are squarely aiming at the boomers with money. Most Chevrolet models also can satisfy boomers that do not have the money or do not feel the need to spend it on a car. Only Saturn and Pontiac seem to be going after a more youthful market.
 
Heck what makes a vehicle more attractive to the boomers? Ride? Ergonomics? Styling?

Messages Page 429 of 610
1
...
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement