Sign In Join 



Can GM make Cadillac the standard of the world Again?

6098 messages,  Last post on Aug 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM

You are in the Automotive News & Views Forum. Your Hosts are steve_ & claires

What is this discussion about? Cadillac Escalade, Cadillac XLR, Cadillac STS, Automotive News


Messages Page 402 of 610
1
...
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion

#4009 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by laurasdada
Dec 26, 2007 (1:23 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 26, 2007 11:41 am)

"I understand the frustration of anyone who had problems with a particular model but I do find that people have nothing but excuses when their German or Japanese car is less than perfect but have no toleration of any difficulties with a GM product."
 
Well, the problem for me/family, is that in the last 30 years we've really had no issues with Japanese cars. That said, in my sales days, besides the aforementioned Olds, I had a Mercury Sable and Dodge Intrepid company cars. The Sable was fine as was the Dodge. What was noticeable in both, compared to my personal cars (Nissan, Saab Lexus) was lesser build quality (moreso the Intrepid) & interior materials, floatier rides and noisier. But no reliablity issues that I can really recall. Interestingly, though my company started phasing out domestic co. cars and phasing in Japanese... I liked the Intrepid enough to let me buy a '99 Chrysler 300M with less trepidation, a car I thoroughly enjoyed. Lousy exterior build quality, though. But, it was a Chrysler!
 
Still may buy an '06 XLR, if I can get it for less than 50% of msrp. But, that's still in the same $ neighborhood of new BMW 3 converts, among others...
#4010 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by lykourinou
Dec 26, 2007 (2:28 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 26, 2007 11:45 am)

I agree GM could do better in their Cadillac interiors......the XLR in particular the interior is dissapointing. The gauge cluster looks like it came out of a 1985 Chevrolet Caprice..All in all the Escalade interior is phenominal. I wish though that they did use real wood. I wish they would use the wood steering wheel that is in the SRX and Enclave and not that wood overlay.
#4011 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by lykourinou
Dec 26, 2007 (2:32 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 26, 2007 10:20 am)

for those who really dont want a GM product any "bad news" will convince them to stay away while similar news from MB or Lexus would barely get their attention. I love it when people say foreign brands can "afford" to have bad quality news because they have such reputations. Bad news is bad news.
 
I hear what you are saying, but you will have to admitt that GM / Chrylser / Ford all use SOC engines while the rest of the world uses DOC. The push rod American engines are outdated and barbaric. Granted I would be tempted to buy a QX over an Escalade, GM and American Cars in gerneral have given themselves a stigma due to cutting too many corners. That being said, I do adore the new EScalade.
#4012 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [lykourinou] by louiswei
Dec 26, 2007 (2:35 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lykourinou (Dec 26, 2007 2:28 pm)

What? Are you kidding me? No real wood in the $50K+ Escalade?
#4013 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [louiswei] by lykourinou
Dec 26, 2007 (2:39 pm)
Reply

Replying to: louiswei (Dec 26, 2007 2:35 pm)

Yep the wood isn't real I have seen reviews where it was told that it was real and I have seen others where they say it is not. I consulted a local dealer and he told me they do not use real wood. The reason being is the sun would cause it to warp and it would not fit properly. He told me that he knows Mercedes uses real wood and that is because people who buy MB have no problem paying what they are asked to pay. Granted if it's fake wood the sun is going to discolor it...most Escalade owners have grages anyway so that would most likely not be an issue depending on where you park when you are away from home.
 
I know it sucks I wish the wood was real.
#4014 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [lykourinou] by fintail
Dec 26, 2007 (2:42 pm)
Reply

Replying to: lykourinou (Dec 26, 2007 2:39 pm)

Many people think the real MB wood is fake anyway, so maybe it isn't a huge deal.
 
Some cars such as my E55 have the dark or grey wood, some people don't even think it is wood, but marble.
#4015 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by trimaster
Dec 26, 2007 (8:30 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 26, 2007 1:00 pm)

"Not yet, but I guarantee you if they persist and are not addressed there will be. Reliability is what got Toyota where they are, and reliability might be their downfall. "
  
dont think so. First of all I cant see Toyota letting their quality fall too far before making changes.

 
I'm glad U said that. That's my point. Why couldn't GM do that? If they did, we wouldn't have this thread, and they wouldn't be playing catch up to all the imports.
 
Furthermore the press is conditioned to make excuses for foreign brands and thus faults that get major negative commentary on domestic vehicles barely get mentioned on foreign vehicles.
 
That is so not true. If that's the case, the C Class Merc and IS 350 would've fared better than the CTS in reviews. There are countless stories about Mercedes quality problems over the years. Why can't you just accept the fact that GM put out inferior products for years?
 
Toyota has been turning out some of the cheapest looking interiors on the market recently and there has been minimal reaction from the press.
 
That's because Toyota isn't known for their interior. If a person wants a good looking interior they'd get a Lexus. When did Toyota put quality interiors in their cars anyway????
 
Meanwhile GM and Chrysler interiors would be ripped for coming to market with the same designs and materials
 
Do U have anything to back up these claims?
 
If a domestic car has a check engine light come on they will be ready to trade it in for a Toyota ASAP. People of a certain age in this country have been conditioned to nearly worship foreign engineering for a long time and they refuse to believe that American cars arent as inferior as they have thought for the last 30+ years. Its incredible how many import loyalists will bash current domestics and then tell you in the next breath that they havent owned a domestic vehicle since the 80s but they are sure quality is the same now as it was then. You cant base a decision about ANYTHING on what happened 25 years ago.
 
Whose fault is that? If anything those other makers did a great job of building brand loyalty over the years while GM was twiddling their thumbs. That's GM's fault and nobody elses. Why be mad at the consumer? If they want those customer's (and their kids) to come back to GM, they better build 1 helluva product.
 
  
#4016 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [fintail] by lykourinou
Dec 26, 2007 (8:31 pm)
Reply

Replying to: fintail (Dec 26, 2007 2:42 pm)

It's real, and MB has some of the best interiors in the industry, but others are catching on. GM had done a superb job on the new Escalade. I was shocked when it first came out..
#4017 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by trimaster
Dec 26, 2007 (8:44 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 26, 2007 12:54 pm)

i'm a little confused as to why you are getting offended. I said nothing "persona", I could have substituted "people" for you. In other words most people wouldnt be skeptical of buying a Lexus in spite of the rash of recent Toyota quality issues but when GM issues a recall its like the end of the world.

 
My apologies. Sorry about that!
 
I see your point, but you want pele to forget the past and they won't. That's why Toyota quality issues haven't hurt them yet. There's a lag time in both cases.
#4018 of 6098
Re: Road & Track comparison [mrsyj] by trimaster
Dec 26, 2007 (8:55 pm)
Reply

Replying to: mrsyj (Dec 26, 2007 12:54 pm)

Just saying recalls are issued for numerous reasons, not all of them serious. Toyota has been issuing them left and right in the past year or so. GM lost share for MANY reasons. To blame it all on quality is shortsighted. Toyota gained share for many reasons, the primary one being that they have expanded their lineup over the last 50 years and now compete in every single segment in this market. If you compared Toyota's 2007 sakes with its 1987 sales and subtracted all the vehicles that werent available in 1987 their share gains wouldnt be all that impressive. The early leaders in any segment have the most to lose when competition heats up. Same applies to chrysler and minivans. Their share was much higher when they had the market to themselves.
 
It's almost as if you're mking excuses for GM. So are you saying that they couldn't have doe anything to prevent Toyota from as GM helpless and did everything they could to prevent them from being in the situation they are in?

Messages Page 402 of 610
1
...
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
...
610
Prev
Next
Last
Go To Msg #
Search This Discussion
To POST a message, please Sign In.

New? Join Now!

Forum Tools

Please sign in.
Email Address:

Password:

Forgot Password?

Search Forums

Enter Keyword(s)

Advanced Search

Browse by Vehicle



View All Vehicles
Advertisement
Ask the Community
See What People Are Asking

Browse by Board

Browse by Topic


View All Topics

Today's Chats

Advertisement